Summary: The Misinterpretation Of Truth

In William C Platchers essay he states that the bible is true, and if the bible is true than the meaning behind the teaching and stories are true as well. To fully understand the bible and how to apply it to our lives we need to understand its message. Not only the message one the base layer, to understand the message sometimes you need to dig a little deeper. This is something that all Christians are taught, it is one of the fundamentals of our religion. Once we understand the message behind what we read, then we have to trust it. If we trust God our Lord and savior. Then we are able to put that same amount of trust into the bible. He then discusses how different people have come to interpret this truth. William Placher elaborates on two

The bible is a piece of literature that has been re-written many times, and in the bible there are tremendous amounts of illusions. There are illusions in the bible, but not all of them can be recognized easily, they are not all straight forwards in other words.

The issue in chapter two that struck me was when the author began to discuss the meaning of success and how in the last twenty years’ American culture has perpetrated this non-truth, “if you work hard enough, you can be anything you want to be,” (Whelchel, 2012, p. 44). This statement clearly has both pros and cons, since, if an individual believes this then he or she will strive for a goal that can seem out of reach and of a person does not believe this then he or she will never strive for something they perceive as too difficult to obtain. The other point that Whelchel states, “you can be the best in the world,” (2012, p. 44). This problem that I believe the author is pointing out is that when both Christians and non-Christians combine

O’Brien argues that truth is affected by war in that truth is not black and white when it comes to war. Often, the things you find hard to believe are the true stories and the ones that seem like they are possible are not true. He argues that in a true war story, “there is always that surreal seemingness, which makes the story seem untrue,” but it is actually that quality that tells you whether or not it is true. This is different than how we see truth outside of war. We believe things that seem plausible to be true. He also makes the point that truth pertaining to war is not black and white. It is not binary. Most truths in war stories are somewhere between true and false. The author makes the point that “war is also mystery and terror and

Though approaching the Old Testament with sound mind and pure heart, the reader may inadvertently fall into "interpretive pitfalls". According to A Survey of the Old Testament, by Andrew E. Hill, some of these pitfalls include but aren't limited to: not understanding The Bible didn't come in English, or through Western culture (17), not allowing the Bible to speak for itself (26), not recognizing presuppositions (26), or even ignoring the author's message in favor of how the interpreter wants to use the text (27). Of these downfalls, ignoring the author's message must be the worst. To ignore the message of the author means you have studied and properly understood the meaning of what you've read; however, you've chosen to manipulate The Word

When people think of the truth, people think of something that majority agree to. In the other side the author Barry Schwarts fights for the point that learning how to think it’s a personal thought. Schwartz specifies the major educational and goes over a rare question of what learning how to think means. As shown in the article peoples believes are based on others, collage education levels are dropping also the truth is being changed.

Many people find it hard to believe that the Bible is based on true events and is reliable. People do not believe that there is real evidence that the Bible is true. Therefore, they do not trust the history written in the Bible. For example, Thomas Paine was one of many who believed that the Bible is not a reliable source. The Age of Reason was written by him in 1793 and 1794. In it he wrote that he was a deist, a person who believes that God created the universe, but does not become involved with humanity. He wrote in The Age of Reason that he believes that the Holy Spirit did not write the Bible through men, but it was written by men and men alone; therefore, God was not involved in men's lives being that God and the Holy Spirit are one.

In the article “The Attack on Truth” Lee McIntyre writes to communicate the issue of what he calls the willful ignorance of people, both historically and in the present day. Over the years there have been great debates between those that believe in what is considered the natural sciences and the literary critics, one side believing that science can be proven and grounded in facts while the other says the truth, and therefore science in any form, is relative. The author continues to explain that although there is science to prove or disprove truths, a person's attitude is the reason why these truths are often ignored (McIntyre, B11). In the end, the reason why we continue to ignore and as he describes it, disrespect, truth is because although hold the ability to learn how to accurately reason, adults we often choose not to.

The bible is a spiritual guide. There is many dynamics to the bible. It shows stories of men and women going through trial and year. It depicts the actions of people being enslaved and also rulers who dictated how they treated their chattel. The bible is the journey of Jesus and how he brought light to the world. Stories that show how Jesus walked on water, and fed an entire fleet of people with only one bread and fish. Ifnot analyzed and thought through, the bible can be a way to manipulate people into using their earnings and time for the wrong reasons . Many ministers and preachers have caught on to the notion slave owners caught on too. Ifone of power can get a people to believe in certain doctrines; one can control that group of people.

Pluralism puts a security net underneath man's ability to completely understand the full truth. This soi-disant "wellbeing" net supports the individual to fall just in the event that the idea is followed to be a dishonest truth, or even set out we related to speaking express a part-truth down and out of greatest possible ability to hold of a definite truth. Influence on thought is the comparison, however a recipe covered by toughness and trusting openness doesn't compare religiously. Pluralism also goes about as a barricade for thinking more extreme on what really is relatively large, in doing as such this respects pluralism a surface thought, shallow inside and out. It welcomes an intermixing of different thoughts to wind up a part of its

The bible can be very hard to understand if it is not read in the correct manner. Each book in the bible contains their own style of writing. Before you read a book in the bible you should recognize the genre that is used. The reason why it is important to have a clear understanding of the genre is because it helps one understand the possible outcome of the story. For example one knows that a romantic genre story will end with a blossoming relationship. Genre classification helps stories make sense.

Is it really misinterpretation though? According to you it's misinterpretation, but how one chooses to follow a religion is entirely up to them. If someone interprets the Bible, the Torah or the Quran in a way that's different from someone else's interpretation; it doesn't make either of them wrong. It doesn't make the other person any less of a Christian, Jew, or Muslim. Religion is personal and when something is personal it's subjective.

Many people may interpret the Bible and the stories within it in a great deal of different ways. Some people may be absorbed in a story and completely make sense of it. This could possibly be in a completely different way then you did. When this takes place some people may be on edge about being judged for their own thoughts and opinions. This may cause your way of thinking on the meanings for each and every story to sway in a different directions to a certain extent.

The quote of Aageson you used, regarding the gap between intention and interpretation is a powerful statement. No one comes close to literally interpreting the Bible because it's not a clear narrative. It is a danger and an asset of the Bible. The flexibility in the message allows individuals to see what they are seeking. The self confirming truth is helpful, unless it contradicts with morality, as Aageson also explains.

Although the bible is left up for interpretation, many believe that over time the words have been misconstrued. They yearn to