Summary: Thicke, T. I.

All evidence must be authentic, meaning it was produced by the learner and must not be someone else’s work, know as plagiarism.

Center and the law firm of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann, & Bernstein, LLP. The suit was

To check for authenticity the candidate must have confirmed that this is their own work; the assessor must deem it to be original work and the assessor must have checked that any testimonies are from bona

In the Garcia case some examples would be fingerprints, footprints, hair, etc. Everything at the crime scene would be considered circumstantial evidence. Concrete evidence is evidence that is existing in fact and not merely as a possibility. This can include eyewitness testimonies.

Md. Rule 5-901(b)(4); cf. Fed. R. Evid. 901(b)(4) (“The appearance, contents, substance, internal patterns, or other distinctive characteristics of the item, taken together with all the circumstances.” (emphasis added)). Maryland Rule 5-901 illustrates how the internal features of a document can be significant support for establishing the authenticity of that document, so long as there is some extrinsic circumstance that makes those internal features

The parties in this lawsuit are: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (plaintiff) and Mims Distributing Company, Inc (defendant), the EEOC is the plaintiff on behalf of Christopher Alston (Lally, 2015). Christopher Alston was a potential employee of the Mims Distributing Company, Inc.

COUNSEL: For Plaintiff: Mona C. Engel, Esq., Law Offices of Robert F. Danzi, Westbury, New York.

Circumstantial evidence is probably one of the biggest ethical concerns when people are being convicted of crimes. Circumstantial evidence is: “Evidence not bearing directly on the fact in dispute but on various attendant circumstances from which the judge or jury might infer the occurrence of the fact in dispute”. (Dictionay.com, 2010). Many

“We have held that where the works in question are 'so strikingly similar as to preclude the possibility of independent creation, copying may be proved without a showing of access.'" In some cases, the similarities between the plaintiff's and defendant's work are so extensive and striking as, without more, both to justify an inference of copying and to prove improper appropriation. If a plaintiff demonstrates actual copying through proof of a reasonable possibility of access and similarities probative of copying, however, it can prevail on its infringement claim by demonstrating that defendant's work is "substantially similar to that which is original in the plaintiff's expression." With "inexact copies," this assessment proceeds by a comparison of the "total concept and feel of the contested works" as "instructed by common sense.” The court must "analyze the two works closely to figure out in what respects, if any, they are similar, and then determine whether these similarities are due to protected aesthetic expressions original to the allegedly infringed work, or whether the similarity is to something in the original that is free for the taking."

5. “Produce” and “provide” mean to provide a legible true copy of the original or any document and/or communication pertaining to the Plaintiff’s Interrogatories.

Critiquely speaking, this case was not that bad. Robin Thicke payed less than half of what was orginally declared. I believe that the people

Secondly, Inevitable Discovery Doctrine. With this exception, two modes of seizing evidence are considered but only one is physical. Illegal means are used in the securing of the evidence physically. The other seizure of evidence is hypothetical and is seized illegally.

Circumstantial evidence requires proof of probative similarities in addition to proof of access. See Paul Goldstein. These similarities may be found in the “unoriginal and non-copyrightable” parts of the work in question, like occurrences of the same artistic errors. Id. Essentially, if an author can show that it is extremely unlikely that someone else made the same errors independently, then the author has proven probative similarities.

Evidence is defined as any matter of fact, the effect, tendency, or design of which is to produce in the mind a persuasion, affirmative or disaffirmative, of the existence of some other matter of fact that a crime has been committed.(Paul B. Watson, 1986) In a legal sense, evidence is the information presented in court during a trial which enables the judge and jury to decide a particular case (Garland & Stuckey, 2000). There are two main types of evidence, which are testimony and physical items which can be presented to the judge and jury during a criminal trial. Physical evidence is any evidence found at the perpetrator’s