Sun Tzu Compare And Contrast Essay: The Art Of War

Clausewitz’s attack of enemy centers of gravity and Sun Tzu’s prioritization of attack of important elements of national power provide contrasting approaches to the development of effective strategy. These contrasts are reflections of each author’s perspective on how war should be waged, the proper use of force, their definitions of the ideal victory and how best to achieve that victory as well as their methodologies,

Nicolo Machiavelli’s The Prince and Sun Tzu’s The Art of War both both provide directions for leadership with similar goals. The Prince is primarily geared towards providing valuable information about how a ruler of many principalities may govern different populations and acquire new lands. The Art of War provides us with a schematic of the optimal path to victory. This book is instead directed towards generals of powerful militaries with only the goal of winning. Concepts such as Machiavelli’s view of destruction will be contrasted with Sun Tzu’s victory-oriented argument for taking whole and several of their other ideas will be compared. Although Machiavelli and Sun Tzu have different intended audiences, many of their ancient tactics can

It was but a major coincidence that Sun Tzu’s The Art of War came to existence at a similar timeline to the Greco-Persian Wars. Granted, the exact date of the book’s publication was unknown, according to History.com, historians believed that the book was present between the 4th or 5th century BC. Assuming that the estimated date was right, then it was remarkable how the tactics and strategy used in the first and second Persian invasions of Greece that took place from 499 BC to 449 BC, paralleled much of Sun Tzu’s ideology and wisdom on warfare. If Sun Tzu somehow were to travel through space and time to observe the Greco-Persian Wars as it happened, he would have been overwhelmed at the similarities between his principles and the tactics

“The art of war is simple enough. Find out where your enemy is. Get at him as soon as you can. Strike him as hard as you can, and keep moving on”.

The Korean and Vietnam war are very similar in that both were the US's attempt to fight communism by waging war in a distant third world country. Both wars were unpopular in the US and both led to a lack of victory.

What was it like living during the Great Depression? What strategies did Australia use to get out of the Great Depression?

To begin, leaders must study the laws of war to understand the nature of how and why wars are fought. According to Mao, China’s involvement with war both against itself and other nations was crucial, and if they wanted to win the war then they would need to study war in general. There are some common elements that occur in all wars, but in order to be successful during military conflict, an understanding of those elements and how they operate are necessary. Mao states that “War is the highest form of struggle for settling contradictions between classes at given stages of their development”. However, if leaders fail to understand the

     The Korean War would be a radical step in fighting wars, as well as the feelings people had toward the war. All wars in American History fought before the Korean War were based on either national survival or the gain of territory. A strong conflict was created between the Soviet Union and the United States. From this conflict, tension was so strong that wars were fougt in the midst of this Cold War. The Korean War was the first America ever waged that was not fought for national survival, for territory, for manifest destiny or for hegemony. Korea was the first ideological war;" (Coppel, 505).

Many of the people who physically and/or tortured other people during the Cultural Revolution were never actually punished or judged for what they did after the Cultural Revolution ended. At the end of the memoir, Ji-li wrote “Those who persecuted others, even beat or tortured them, were victims too, after all.” (page: 270) This quote is very important because it might’ve been weird for some people because the torturers were not punished.

Sun Tzu He lived and studied throughout China and Asia. 544 BC - 496 BC Sun Tzu was a general and strategist during the warfare China faced against its states who desired power and control of the vacant land. This inspired him to write about tactics, advice, and the principles of warfare, leading to the book called, "The Art of War" and becoming a very well known philosopher today. During Sun Tzu's early years he was under the King of Wu, King Helü, and it can be assumed that he influenced Tzu.

Sun Tzu’s warning about not letting weapons get dull could have helped me in many situations, such as the time in my math class last semester when I showed up to my final unprepared. I allowed myself to overcrowd my schedule and I did not fit enough time in to study for the class or for the final. Another thing is that it probably didn’t help that the night before the math final, I stayed up late in the art studio and then went to go get donuts with a few friends at five in the morning. The problem with my actions was that the math final was that exact morning around eight thirty. I allowed my weapons to become dulled when I didn’t study and when I did not get enough sleep the day before the final. With an hour of sleep and my belly full of donuts, I walked into the classroom dull as could be. I feel like if I had given myself more time to study or to communicate with my professor, I would have received a better grade. I should have listened to the words of wisdom from Sun Tzu to keep my tools sharpened rather than allowing them to become dull.

Sun Tzu understood the nature of war as “the province of life or death,” and a “matter of vital importance to the state.”1 I agree. In my own experience, war awakens your primordial instincts and strips you of your self-rationalizations. Sun Tzu defined the character of war when he wrote, “water has no constant form, there are in war no constant conditions.”2 Accordingly, Sun Tzu’s principals of war offer a framework adequate to explain the nature and character of 21st century warfare, which I rationalize as a near-continuous battle of ideologies fought through asymmetric means to advance the values and interests of state and non-state actors.

The Second Sino-Japanese war began on July 7th, 1937 and ended on September 9th, 1945. It was a military conflict which was fought between the Republic of China and the Empire of Japan. As part of the struggle against fascism, Japan invaded China. It is clear that, due to the restriction of its natural resources, Japan tried to increase by robbing resources from other countries. Japan used the conquered Manchuria as a launching base for their troops. Manchuria was an enormous region that consisted of three provinces- Liaoning in the south, Jilin in the middle and Heilongjiang in the north. In 1905, when Japan defeated Russia in the Russo-Japanese war, Russia, which used Manchuria for business and

Another significant lesson on warfare and leadership put forth by Sun Tzu was having the ability to conquer areas with no fighting at all. This lesson also involved the ability to absorb and expand within an area instead of total domination and annihilation. Sun Tzu mentioned, “In the practical art of

Economists and strategists find that maneuvers for battle and for life can come from anything. Even from games. One of the most interesting articles on the subject is that written by Li (2004) where he takes the Chinese game 'go' to demonstrate insights on Chinese life, war, and military stratagems that can be helpful to US political and military leaders. Through evaluation of the game, he says, we can have an enhanced understanding of Sun Tzu's Art of War.