Supply Side Economics Research Paper

Reaganomics are the economic policies that were set and promoted in 1980s by the U.S. President Ronald Reagan. These policies are mainly connected to trickle-down economics. There are four pillars that are associated with the economic policy of Reagan and they include: reduce government economic regulation, reduce growth of how much the government spends, reduce the marginal tax rates such as capital gains tax and income tax and lastly reduce the level of inflation by controlling money supply growth. These four policies were expected to increase investment and savings, balance the U.S. budget, reduce inflation, increase the economic growth rate, restore healthy financial markets and reduce

Reagan really focused on improving the economy during his presidency, with a plan he called Reaganomics, or supply side economics. The main parts of this plan were cuts on taxes and budgets, and monetary policy. Also, he wanted to reduce government regulation on businesses. He thought that these and increasing defense expenditures would heighten economic efficiency. Reagan managed to cut taxes by twenty five percent in three years. However, the plans did not work out at first, causing a recession that some call “The Great Inflation.” The national debt heightened substantially, and the rate of unemployment reached up to eleven percent. Despite these negative outcomes, the economy experienced a sudden growth and prosperity in 1983, which was

Reaganomics—also known as supply-side and trickle-down economics—is an economic policy practiced by presidents Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, and Herbert Hoover in the twenties and most recently, by the fortieth president of the United States, Ronald Reagan. Just like the state of the economy before Reagan stepped into office, the economy of the United States today is in a vulnerable place. The economy has taken multiple blows over the last few years: a recession in 2008, a close call in 2011, and an overwhelming deficit. Most Americans are looking for something to change. While some are advocating for an increase in the government’s power in order to step in and seemingly help the people, the way for the government to truly succor

Reagan won 51 percent of the vote and carried all but five states and the District of Columbia. Once a Hollywood actor, his sense of reassurance and optimistic style appealed to many Americans. Reagan’s campaign appealed to conservatives with promises of big tax cuts and a smaller government. When he took office, he promised to get the federal government out of Americans’ lives. He advocated for industrial deregulation, reductions in government spending, and tax cuts for both individuals and corporations. This economic plan was called supply-side economics. Supply-side economists believed that high taxes took too much away from investors. If taxes were cut, businesses and investors could use their extra capital to make new investments, and businesses could expand and create new jobs. The result would be a larger supply of goods for consumers, who would now have more money to spend because of the tax

Reagan implemented policies based on supply-side economics and advocated a classical liberal and laissez-faire philosophy, seeking to stimulate the economy with large, across-the-board tax cuts. Reagan’s outlook on economics was what he and the public called “Reaganomics”. “The blueprint for “Reaganomics,” was a sketched out supply-side approach to the economic, including massive cuts in income taxes, capital gains taxes, and corporate taxes,”(340). His platform advocated reducing tax rates to spur economic growth, controlling the money supply to reduce inflation, deregulation of the economy, and reducing government spending. Reagan's policies proposed that economic growth would occur when marginal tax rates were low enough to spur investment, which would then lead to increased economic growth, higher employment, and wages. Reagan’s beliefs on cutting taxes were supported by ideas of William Sumner who believed that the best equipped to win the struggle for existence was the American businessman, and concluded that taxes and regulations serve as dangers to his survival. Reagan believed strong nations were composed of people who were successful at expanding their empires and these strong nations would survive in the struggle for dominance.

Inflation and unemployment numbers rose simultaneously, in contrary to the Keynesian theory that the Nixon administration based their policies upon. Criticism of Keynesianism became louder as the belief of a declining US economy grew and instead, economic liberal theory associated with Friedrich von Hayek and Milton Friedman won popularity. Inevitably this led to a paradigm shift towards laissez-faire economics and the idea that “government intervention necessarily impedes growth and prosperity” (CroG, p. 89). President Jimmy Carter executed the 1978 Revenue act that lowered corporate, capital gains and individual tax. In line with neoliberal ideas, numerous sectors were deregulated. In 1981, Ronald Reagan took office and carried out reforms that built on the legacy of Carter. Comparing the Reagan administration to Carter’s, the former manifested even stronger support for neoliberal ideas (CroG, p. 89). The 1981 Economic Recovery Tax Act was inspired of the Laffer curve, a theory that lower tax rates increases government revenues and economic growth as people will increase their productivity when allowed to keep a greater part of their income. Tax levels retained progressive and were in average cut by 30 % (CroG, p. 91). Following the reforms, the U.S economy grew and income levels

He claimed an undue tax burden, excessive government regulation, and massive social spending programs hampered growth. Reagan proposed a phased 30% tax cut for the first three years of his Presidency. The bulk of the cut would be concentrated at the upper income levels. The economic theory behind the wisdom of such a plan was called “SUPPLY-SIDE” or “TRICKLE-DOWN ECONOMICS.” (Reaganomics. (n.d.). Tax relief for the wealthy would allowed them to consume and fund more. This would put the economy in a better position and their would be more job

The article which I chose in this assignment comes from “The Michigan Daily”, which is a newspaper native to the state of Michigan and its residents. The main subject of the article is the recent increase in season ticket prices for the University of Michigan football games. This price increase will mostly impact the students of the University of Michigan who are normal in attendance, but will also impact the loyal non-student fans as well. Michigan is a nationally renowned college football powerhouse who is famous for its enormous stadium and its extremely loyal fans.

This economic expansion and boost would occur through citizens who would spend the extra tax money on products and services in their geographical region or who would invest money into businesses in their area. The only problem for the government using this theory would be the initial revenues that the government would lose from the tax cuts. In theory the economic growth would eventually increase taxable incomes, this increase in taxable incomes should cause the governmental revenues to grow in the long run. With the idea of Reaganomics in mind President Reagan persuaded Congress to pass the Economic Recovery Tax Act, which is the first major step in his plan. This Tax Act called for a 25 percent tax cut that was implemented over a three-year period (David Mervin, 1990, 133-7). The only problem with this tax cut is the fact that it mainly benefited the upper - income taxpayers and large corporations. The reason that these groups were targeted is because there is more of a chance that they will invest their money in business programs that will promote economic growth. After this tax cut took effect the American people in the lower - income tax brackets were not pleased with the results. They seemed to be faced with an increase in their tax rates even though most of them were in the income categories below the national average. On the other end of the spectrum the people that were in the upper tax brackets were experiencing significant tax cuts. The

1. Suppose that there are two states that do not trade: Iowa and Nebraska. Each state produces the same two goods: corn and wheat. For Iowa the opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of wheat is 3 bushels of corn. For Nebraska the opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of corn is 3 bushels of wheat. Present production is:

One monetary policy enforced in the economy are low interest rates, set by the Central Bank. The reason they are low is to influence aggregate demand in the economy. Low interest rates mean that the cost of borrowing

In modern society, it is vital to understand the principles and policies that make up our economy. Although many are unaware, the economic decisions made by the Feds, congress, and the president affect how individuals live, invest, and purchase on a day to day basis. As economic policies fluctuate and the value of the dollar increases or decreases, the demand, supply, and prices of goods fluctuate and determine individual 's standards of living and how they consume. Whichever economic policies are currently in effect determines the affordability of certain products, thus determining how individuals allocate their funds. The allocation of individuals funds determines how much profit companies and businesses make, which can either stimulate or slow down the overall economy. The breakdown of the primary economic policies, including demand-side, supply-side, and monetary policy, are the prime components that distinguishes how we as consumers are affected by the economy.

In according to the supply curve, if the amount of supply were to decrease, then the amount demanded by the public would increase. As the resource decreases in quantity, it becomes scarce among the people and seems to be more precious that it was beforehand. This outbreak in the wand to buy such a finite product causes the price to increase as well. Soon enough the amount people would spend on gasoline or oil would be surpass the amount they could possibly spend on renewable resources. Since the supply and demand could be influenced by such a collapse in the quantity supplied, the government should take control of how much may be extracted each year. At the moment they only control the price ceiling per unit, but with the control on

It is useful to define Monetary and Fiscal policy. Monetary policy involves changing the interest rate and influencing the money supply. It is usually carried out by the central bank and monetary authorities. This involves setting base interest rates

Monetary policy is a part overall economic policy of a country. It is employed by the government as an effective tool to promote economic stability and achieve certain predetermined objectives.