Supremacist Ideologies in Heart of Darkness
Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness colludes with the ethnocentric attitude of Europeans towards the native people of Africa. At the turn of the century, European imperialism was viewed as "a crusade worthy of this century of progress" by King Leopold of Belgium. Although Conrad was critical of imperialism, his novella reveals to the reader an undeniable Victorian provenance. It endorses cultural myths of the period and reinforces the dominant ideology of the British gentleman. Its Victorian provenance is revealed in the representation of race, which is constructed through the character Marlow. His powerful narrative viewpoint reinforces what Chinua Achebe called Europe's "comforting
…show more content…
It is further suggested that this ambivalence towards other races is part of the "deliberate belief" which is necessary in order for British gentlemen to resist the appeal of descending into the natives' primordial "fiendish row" which takes place on shore during to the trip to the Inner Station. In this encounter, the Africans are seen as a howling mob. Marlow does admit a "remote kinship" with them, but he explains that he was prevented from going "ashore for a howl and a dance" because of his dedication to efficiency and his redeeming work ethic. Marlow describes the native who works as a fireman on board the steamer as an "improved specimen" who had been given the gift of "improving knowledge" by the Europeans. Yet the narrator is condescending towards his "intrepidity" in working the boiler and calls him a "fool-nigger" for having "deserted his post" during the attack. The ideologies of the British gentleman are consistently privileged over any attempt to understand the natives.
In almost all of these encounters, black Africans are denied speech. Marlow is content to describe their attempts at communication as a "violent babble of uncouth sounds" or "short, grunting phrases". The two occasions on which the natives are granted speech only further serve to marginalise them. The helmsman's cry to "catch 'im... Eat im!" when asked by Marlow what he would do with the natives on shore
The above epitomizes what Marlow thinks about what colonialism really brought to Africa. Some Europeans may have genuinely believed in the idea of colonialism as being noble, but this "belief in the idea" cannot save the horrible actions of colonialism or make them acceptable. Indeed this false belief in an idea, rather then the practicalities of colonialism only aids to brutality of such actions.
Joseph Conrad uses charazation in the novella Heart of Darkness to show how appalling imperialism truly is. Characters such as Kurtz, the accountant, and the pilgrims plays bigger role than just existing for Marlow’s story. The biggest character in the novella other than Marlow is Kurtz. Kurtz represents a wide variety of different things. He is the perfect example of the insanity imperialism can breed in people. He displays what horrors of imperialism can turn people into. From the second Marlow gets to the Congo everyone admires and
Marlow further degrades Africans by depicting the natives as simplistic and prehistoric. "The prehistoric man was cursing us, praying to us, welcoming us—who could tell?" (Page 137). The natives are so primitive that they are denied language. Marlow chooses to question African culture by asking "who could tell?" instead of trying to grasp the native's signals because he believes the man's ideas are insignificant and shouldn’t be taken seriously or that the African is too insane to have anything allegeable to
In the town of Maycomb, the black population is judged upon their skin color. For instance, when Mr. Gilmer is cross-examining Tom, and speaking to him without dignity. Mr. Gilmer says to Tom during his cross-examination “are you being impudent to me boy.”(225). Mr. Gilmer called a grown man boy, it was clear he showed no respect to Tom, who is black. Likewise, Calpurnia escorts Jem and Scout to the black church, and Calpurnia changes the way she talks. As Scout is observing Calpurnia talk, she says “why do you talk nigger talk?”(143). In Scout’s and Jem’s mind Calpurnia has never talked nigger talk; Scout is judging Calpurnia because she talks nigger talk. In Support of, Calpurnia introduces Jem and scout to her friend Lola, and Lola disapproves of the while children in a black church. Lola yells “you ain’t got no business bringin’ white chillum here- they got their church and we got our’n! (136).
This enables us to see the white society’s prejudice consumption to believe that all Negroes are alike and dumb witted savages who do not have any thought for their life or future. Prejudice is further seen during Tom Robinson’s trial through the usage of idiom of the racist south such as ‘nigger, darky, and boy’ by the general white society. The use of offensive language which is usually reserved for animals such as ‘I seen that black nigger… ruttin’ on my Mayella!’ further shows the vast amounts of racial prejudice sewn in the white man’s heart. This metaphor of Tom ‘ruttin’ depicts that the black man has been reduced to such low levels in society that he is compared to an animal.
Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness is full of oppositions. The most obvious is the juxtaposition of darkness and light, which are both present from the very beginning, in imagery and in metaphor. The novella is a puzzling mixture of anti-imperialism and racism, civilization and savagery, idealism and nihilism. How can they be reconciled? The final scene, in which Marlow confronts Kurtz's Intended, might be expected to provide resolution. However, it seems, instead, merely to focus the dilemmas in the book, rather than solving them.
Marlow’s evolution renders ‘Heart of Darkness’ a remarkable work of literature, but it is not simply the budding of the narrator’s mind that makes the novel sensational. Marlow’s perception of the voyage is what truly renders the work exceptional. European expansion, as written by European writers, was generally cast in a positive light. When Conrad depicts the desolation of the journey and reveals the sanities and lives robbed through the conquest, he clearly does not conform to the writers of his time. This exposure of European expansion in such a sinister a fashion was innovative for writers of the late 17th century. This revolutionary perception is what truly allows ‘Heart of Darkness’ to be considered a novel rich in moral and detail.
Joseph Conrad 's Heart of Darkness is both a dramatic tale of an arduous trek into the Belgian Congo at the turn of the twentieth century and a symbolic journey into the deepest recesses of human nature. On a literal level, through Marlow 's narration, Conrad provides a searing indictment of European colonial exploitation inflicted upon African natives. By employing several allegoric symbols this account depicts the futility of the European presence in Africa.
The novella, Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad, is a piece that pushed the envelope of its time due to an oppositional stance on the forced imperialism of primitive and/or impoverished countries. The protagonist of this story is the self-proclaimed explorer, Marlow, who decides to leave the heart of light and purity (Europe) and take a job as a steamboat captain in the dark jungles of the Congo Free State in Africa. Upon his arrival, Marlow begins to see the impact of Belgium’s intrusion on the Congo by means of implementing slavery, commandeering ivory (a valuable resource), and presenting a negative attitude toward the primitive population. Marlow eventually becomes obsessed with an ivory
Achebe argues that the racist observed in the Heart of Darkness is expressed due to the western psychology or as Achebe states “desire,” this being to show Africa as an antithesis to Europe. He first states Conrad as “one of the great stylists of modern fiction.” [pg.1] He praises Conrad’s talents in writing but believes Conrad’s obvious racism has not been addressed. He later describes in more detail that
"Restraint! I would have just as soon expected restraint from a hyena prowling amongst the corpses of a battle," comments Marlow as he questions why the hungry cannibals aboard his steamer hadn't gone for the white crew members (Conrad 43). "The glimpse of the steamboat . . . filled those savages with unrestrained grief," Marlow explains after recalling the cries of the natives seeing the steamer amidst a brief fog lift (Conrad 44). "Poor fool! He had no restraint, no restraint . . .a tree swayed by the wind," speaks Marlow of a slain helmsman amidst an attack by tribal savages (Conrad 52). "Mr. Kurtz lacked restraint in the gratification of his various lusts," says Marlow a few moments after he tells of his first glimpse of
Conrad revealed his ideas through his character, Marlow, when we read his experiences traveling down the Congo when he sees the natives and their land that has been untouched by colonialism. Conrad’s lack of concern for the natives may have been a result of his experiences with them during his journey in Africa. Assuming Heart of Darkness’ character Marlow is a representation of Conrad himself, he did saw the native people in both conditions. He experienced them in the Belgium Congo, beaten and broken from the harshness of the colonists and he saw them in their natural state before the effects of colonialism had reached them. One may argue that his lack of concern for the natives was because he had seen them in their homeland and before their home had been changed, and maybe he chose to believe that there was hope left in Africa for its tribal tradition. This statement is simply not true; Marlow fully experienced the devastation left by colonialism in Africa, yet his animosity towards colonialism was still due to the concern for his own people, the white colonists.
In Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad, the imperialism of Africa is described. Conrad tells the story of the cruel treatment of the natives and of the imperialism of the Congo region through the perspective of the main character, Marlow. Throughout the novel, Marlow describes how the Europeans continuously bestow poor treatment to the native people by enslaving them in their own territory. Analyzing the story with the New Criticism lens, it is evident that Conrad incorporates numerous literary devices in Heart of Darkness, including similes, imagery, personification, and antitheses to describe and exemplify the main idea of cruel imperialism in Africa discussed throughout the novella.
Throughout the novella, it seems as if the narrator is describing the Africans as being almost human, but not quite. There seems to be a line drawn between African and European that is much thicker than country borders. In a description of a sick boy, the narrator says, “the man seemed young—almost a boy—but you know with them it’s hard to tell” (17 Norton). This statement may seem harmless, but it is completely unnecessary. It reveals how few interactions Marlow had with the Africans, and his use of the word “them” creates a ethnical barrier. Along with negative descriptions of Africans, Marlow also uses a great amount of racial slurs when speaking
In Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad, challenges a dominant view by exposing the evil nature and the darkness associated with the colonialist ventures. It is expressed by Marlow as "robbery with violence, aggravated murder on a great scale, and men going at it blind - as it is very proper for those who tackle a darkness." The European colonialists are portrayed as blind lightbearers, people having a façade of progress and culture, yet are blind of their actions. They think they are brining a light to a darkness, yet they are the real darkness or evil. Conrad's critique of European colonialism is most apparent through the oppositions of light and darkness, with the