Supreme Court Justice: Byron R. White

A lot of court cases are historically important and sometimes they the result in changing certain laws. For example, the Brown v. Board of Ed court case ended racial segregation in the U.S., and the Gideon v. Wainwright case required the state to provide low-income defendants with an attorney if they could not afford one. These two cases changed the Federal Constitution against racism and made it possible for all citizens to have the same rights in Untied State, and everyone experiences these changes on a daily basis. Another court case made a change in the Federal Constitution is Tinker v. Des Moines. Tinker v. Des Moines court case took a big part during the Vietnam War because it brought even more attention to the

“Presidents come and go, but the Supreme Court goes on forever,” declared by past President William Howard Taft. Dated in 1789, the Judiciary Act by signed by Congress, which was demanded by the United States Constitution. This past principal court was ruled by a Chief Justice and five Associate Justices, accordingly today we still have a Chief Justice, but we currently have eight Associate Justices. The current Supreme Court has John G. Roberts, Jr. as Chief Justice, and the following are the current Associate Justices: Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr., Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan. Clarence Thomas, a conservative, best known as the second

Thurgood Marshall was significant as he was the first African-American to be appointed a position in the U.S Supreme Court, in 1967. His significance to civil rights is evident between 1947 and 1967, in one contemporary newspaper he was even referred to as “Mr Civil Rights”. In 1947-1961 Thurgood worked as the NAACP’s lawyer, where he argued his most famous cases – Brown v Topeka (1954) and Browder v Gayle (1956). Furthermore, the appointments by both, President John F. Kennedy and President Johnson, are significant in themselves because he was the first African-American to be appointed to the Supreme Court. Despite his influence on the civil rights movement, Thurgood took a lot of criticism which effected his attitudes towards other people involved with the civil rights movement and, in general.

Thurgood was appointed as the U.S second Circuit in 1961 for four years none of Marshall’s decision were overturned by the Supreme Court. Lyndon B. Johnson appointed Thurgood as the first black U.S solicitor general. Marshall won 14 of the 19 cases he argued before the Supreme Court for two years as solicitor.

The decisions made by Supreme Court chief justice John Marshall have had a major influence on today’s Judiciary System. One of his major decisions was in the case Marbury v. Madison, in which he set the precedent of judicial review. Another major decision is in the case McCulloch v. Maryland, in this case Marshall ruled that Congress possesses certain implied powers. Other major decisions made by Marshall were in the cases Dartmouth College v. Woodward, Gibbons v. Ogden, in which Marshall defined national power over interstate commerce, and Cherokee Nation v. State of Georgia.

Clarence Thomas is the very second African American justice to serve on the supreme court of the united states he was controversially appointed in 1991 And leans conservative.

The life of Thurgood Marshall and the legacy that he abandoned has affected the present day U.S. Legal Branch today. He did numerous things throughout his life that were persuasive to the administration. He did as well as could be expected to end all racial isolation. He had worked inside the Supreme Court to end the enduring legacy of subjection in the nation. He additionally worked for the benefit of American culture (Haddock).

There were many cases during the civil rights movement that helped shape the world into what it is today. By the middle of the twentieth century, black people had long experienced a physical and social landscape of white supremacy, embedded in policy, social codes, and both intimate and spectacular forms of racial restriction and violence. It was time for a change. The Supreme Court made many decisions to change and affect this movement. Some of these these cases are Dred Scott vs. John F.A. Stanford, Plessy vs. Ferguson, and Shelley vs. Kraemer.

It has been presented to the Supreme Court of the United States of America that Mr. Dred Scott pleas for freedom from his slave master, Mr. Sanford. Initially Mr. Scott was owned by Dr. Emerson until Mr. Emerson’s death when Scott was sold to Mr. Sanford. Under intense scrutiny and discernment it has been decided by the Supreme Court that Mr. Dred Scott has the inalienable right to be a free citizen of the United States of America. Scott is a slave, owned by Mr. and Mrs. John Emerson since 1836. Scott currently resides in St. Louis, Missouri as of 1830. Mr. Dred Scott has presided residence in both Illinois and Wisconsin Territory, accompanied by his slaveholder. The Illinois and Wisconsin Territories are free, meaning that no man nor woman can be private property of another. Because of this, Mr. Emerson has no control nor jurisdiction over Scott. Mr. Scott resided in free territory for several years, therefore, he must leave this courtroom as a free man. Although slavery is not abolished in the South, it is abolished in both of the territories that Scott visited during his involvement with Mr. Emerson, making it his right to be free. It is of the slaveholder’s duty to not enter the territories of Illinois and Wisconsin expecting his slave to maintain in his possession. The responsibility is left on Mr. Emerson and it is due to his ignorance that his slave will gain freedom today. Slavery is prohibited in both territories, making it unreasonable that a man should remain a

The prologue of Showdown: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court Nomination That changed America by Wil Haygood, discusses President Lyndon Johnson’s nomination of Thurgood Marshall, which was described as putting white supremacy in a coffin. Showdown describes the process that Thurgood Marshall took before and after his Supreme Court nomination. Thurgood Marshall was a lawyer who was very successful in arguing before the Supreme Court. Marshall transformed the world of African Americans to opportunities. The achievements of Brown v. Board of Education, Shelley v. Kraemer, and other cases wouldn’t have been possible without Marshall and the NAACP, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. The Brown v. Board of Education

The Warren Court decided a number of important constitutional issues during its time and those decisions continue to influence our daily lives (Urofsky 253). Warren was appointed Chief Justice in 1953 by President Eisenhower (Earl Warren Biography). During his 16-year tenure, he was one of the most influential advocates for social progress in the United States. During his term he dealt with controversial cases on civil rights and civil liberties and the very nature of the political system. According to Lucas Powe in The Warren Court and American Politics, the Warren Court created the image of the Supreme Court as a revolutionary body, a powerful force for social change. Even though Warren clearly was not the most scholarly justice on the Court his leadership abilities and skill as a statesman enabled him to be an extremely effective Chief Justice. The decisions made in the Warren court cases affected America back in the day and still affect us till this day.

The Supreme Court's decisions under John Marshall's leadership at the time, did not extend federal power too much because his opinions were needed to resolve and unite the states. The amount of power he had at the time was appropriate for the situation. The Supreme Court has an important role in out American government though, to lay the final decision in few peoples hands is giving them way to much power. The Supreme Court has a significant amount of influence on many important legal issues for our country, why do we give that much authority to individuals who are appointed for life without being elected?

Rehnquist was appointed by President Nixon and took his oath into office as associate justice on January 7, 1972. Rehnquist has served as the court conservative ideologue. William served as a chief justice of the Supreme Court from September 26, 1986 to September 3, 2005. During his time that he served as a Supreme Court judge, he wrote majority of opinions on the fourth amendment with included searches, seizures and traffic stops. Rehnquist argued about conservative views in a number of cases held by the Supreme Court. “His writings were mostly for the majority or dissenting opinions. Rehnquist had recognized his conservative viewpoints through the deference to the government over individual rights, respect for legislative actions in

The Supreme Court has looked over many cases, all making life changes and some making no difference in the world. The case Texas vs. Johnson uproared so many political arguments, amendment arguments, and even country disputes. This case was and is still so important because it brought of the basis of the government's beliefs against an individual. The government and many military personales found it offensive, but the key to liberty is free

The Supreme Court of the United States of America often makes decisions, which change this great nation in a great way. These changes can affect society in many different ways. In many instances there is dissonance over their decisions and the court itself is often split as to how the views are looked upon. The effect of the Courts decision generates discourse and on occasion, violence. This is what happened in the case of Miranda v. Arizona in 1966. This case changed the history of this country and left a tremendous impact, which many challenge, the ruling and still protest today.