Supreme Court Justice Process

Under the U.S. Constitution, this appointment is a lifelong position that will only be nullified if the judge resigns their post or dies in office. This creates serious contests within the partisan political environment found among federal representatives, for any candidate appointed to this post helps define the direction of the Supreme Court for the rest of their life. Thus, it is frequently believed that a president who appoints a judge to the Supreme Court is creating a legacy, helping to shape the direction of the laws for the country for a time long after their presidency has expired. This makes the selection of a judge a hotly contested process.

There are two major factors that affect the confirmation process of a president’s nominees; one is party affiliation. Party affiliation is very important when the Senate is confirming a nominee, because Senate confirms nominees by a ⅔ vote. This could be very crucial to the president and his or her nominee, because if the majority of the Senate is part of the opposing party, this becomes difficult for the president to get his nominee confirmed. The second political factor is qualification to become a judge or justice. The Senate does not want an unqualified judge who does not know what he or she is doing. It is important to the Senate to approve someone who has experience in the judicial field than someone who has no experience at all. The

There is an open seat in the supreme court. Since the death of justice Antonin Scalia in February 2016, President Barack Obama has attempted to appoint judge Merrick Garland to fill this vacancy. However, the currently Republican U.S. Senate has refused to act on the nomination. This is not the first time the Senate has disagreed with the president's choice of nominee. The Senate confirms just around eighty percent of the president's nominations. There is a strong rationale behind this two-tiered appointment system. Seats in the Supreme Court are extremely important positions to hold; the Supreme Court has the role of interpreting the text of the Constitution and using that interpretation

The position of a Supreme Court Justice is appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the Senate. Once the appointment is confirmed, the judges “serve until their death, retirement

Court and process: Constitutional Court ruled that the law is the prerogative of the federalism, not only reconciliation state governments. The state of government did not agree that would be their responsibility for repaid Mr. Barron. The chief justice John Marshall thought that this is not the states problem, and there is nothing to do in the side of the city of Baltimore. Mr. Barron insists that is in the faith amendment and it should be until the bill of right of the state government, and the federal government were unsure of the faith amendment was so clear. However, after the civil war the state of government made the fourth amendment that the state can’t take any bill of rights from the citizen.

During the process for selecting justices the president can nominate whoever he wants to serve as a justice. His nomination then goes to the Senate

The Supreme court once handled a criminal trial? Today, the mere mention of lynching evokes negative reactions from people, but in the past not so much. If you were a person of color, you feared lynching because laws were either not enforced or did not exist to protect you from that disgusting method of death. I want to examine the history of the court case, United States v. Shipp (1906), to give one account of the American legal process eked a victory for African-Americans. The Supreme Court case is notable because the legal process brought few victories for Blacks in the late/early 20th century America. For example, the thought of a Black man causing harm to a white woman was fatally unforgivable and some were lynched by the public, regardless of their innocence. In the case of Ed Johnson of Tennessee, he met that same fate; his sixth amendment rights were violated in the process. He was a citizen of the United States, and guaranteed the same rights as anyone else living in the country.

Supreme Court justices are elected through a political process; they have their own personal view, which would affect their decision-making. This is why some scholars assert that the justices; political preferences play a critical role in their decisions in many cases. For example, the justices appointed by conservative presidents tend to have conservative views, while those appointed by liberal presidents have the opposite view.

If the president nominates the judge; that nominee is then interviewed by a senate judiciary committee, in this processes the committee will send out “blue slips” to the state senators that the judgeship resides in to confirm the nomination. If the state senators do not send back these “blue slips” the nominee is not recommended to the full senate. In the case with Supreme court Justice Nominees, the President works with the White House and multiple states, of the district that the Supreme Court vacancy resides in, instead of just one specific state. At this point after the senate judiciary committed signs off on the nominee, the nominee will then be voted on in the full senate; however, the process can also prove difficult as getting a hearing scheduled for the vote can be blocked by the minority party in the senate via filibuster. Finally, if a nominee is able to get a simple majority vote on the senate floor, they sworn in and appointed as a new federal judge or Supreme Court

The Supreme Court serves as the head of the judicial branch and is made up of 9 justices, 8 associate justices and 1 chief justice. Unlike the other branches of government, the members of the Supreme Court are nominated by the President and approved by the Senate. The Judicial branch interprets the law though the use of court cases and has the power of judicial review where it can rule whether or not something is permitted under the constitution. Those chosen as Justices of the Supreme Court are selected by the President and approved by the Senate. They are not elected for terms by vote like the other branches of Government but instead appointed by the President and approved by the Senate for life. The reason for this is that the constitution states that justices “shall hold their Offices

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest federal court of the United States. Article III of the U.S. Constitution authorized the Supreme Court. The U.S. also has a system of separated powers with three branches of government: executive, legislative, and judicial. The Supreme Court is part of the judicial branch. Since the death of Supreme Court Justice Scalia, there has been a debate on who should appoint the next justice, the current president, President Obama or the next president. According to the Constitution if a position in the Supreme Court was to become vacant, the constitution states the president, “shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint…Judges of the Supreme Court.” The confirmation of a Supreme Court Justice is a solemn responsibility that the President and the Senate share under the U.S. Constitution. Due to enumerated powers, President Obama should be able to nominate or appoint a supreme justice because it is his responsibility to do so.

The Supreme Court includes the Chief Justice (John Roberts) and seven Associate Judges ( Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan) and one vacancy, a number that is controlled by Congress. The President has the duty of naming judges, whose affirmations are controlled by the United States Senate. These arrangements are lifetime residencies. Likewise, there are court officers who are instrumental in helping the

That distinction is crucial now than ever before because Justice Scalia was one of the most conservative judges. Moreover, with Scalia included, the Supreme Court leaned on the conservative side. Some high-profile Republicans in the Senate are pushing first to have a new president before they can confirm a new appointment. This push comes from an informal rule known as ‘THURMOND RULE ' that implies no new justice appointments should be made especially by the president during the final days in the presidential office. However, the rule’s application is wildly inconsistent. If the Supreme Court seat were to be left vacant for an entire year or so, it would be highly likely that more split decision would lie in the hands liberal-leaning lower courts, instead of receiving the overrules of the initially conservative-leaning Supreme Court. This move is brought about by the fact that the Supreme Court is evenly split as compared to the not so balanced Courts of Appeals. There is also an indirect problem if the seat was left vacant. If Senate refused to confirm an otherwise acceptable or popular candidate, it would affect the upcoming elections. Nine of 34 Senate seats up for re-election are close enough battles that may switch sides in the upcoming election. Six of the seats are Republican 's. Notably, five

The recent death of Justice Antonin Scalia, a widely respected conservative, has led to much contention among major political parties, and major news coverage. Though President Obama has the right and duty to nominate a new justice, Republicans feel that he should forgo the nomination and leave it for the incoming president to make since this is the last year of Obama’s final term. Democrats feel that President Obama should make the nomination, as it is dictated in

The Supreme Court consists of nine Justices: the Chief Justice of the United States and eight Associate Justices. They have equal weight when voting on a case and the Chief Justice has no casting vote or power to instruct colleagues. The Justices are nominated by the President and confirmed with the 'advice and consent' of the Senate. As federal judges, the Justices serve during "good behavior", meaning essentially that they serve for life and can be removed only by resignation or by impeachment and subsequent conviction. The court deals with matters pertaining to the federal government, disputes between states, and interpretation of the Constitution. It can declare legislation or executive action made at any level of the government as