Susan B Anthony Research Paper

In the early stages of the year 1873, social reformer, women's rights advocate, proponent of feminism, Susan B. Anthony, shed’s light on women being able to have a lawful right to vote, with an influential speech, that leads to equality for women and men, this protest coordinates women and voting, but also opens opportunity for women in everything that they do. Susan B. Anthony supports her claims in a forceful manner, by explaining the amount of suffrage taking place in women's lives, as a result of the lack of rights they have, she gives a valid example by explaining her arrest, for “the alleged crime of having voted at the last presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote”, she states that she did not commit a crime, she just exercised her rights as a citizen guaranteed by the National Constitution. Anthony’s purpose is to exert the rights for women that are in the Constitution, that are being overlooked by the United States Government. She establishes a compelling tone for whom it applies to.

Women’s rights to vote women couldn’t vote back in the late 1800’s. Women had to stay home and take care of the children, cook and clean the house and when their husbands get home take care of them too. Although women had to do all those things they were not paid equal for the things they did. Women were told it is not job to vote that it is a man’s job to do the voting and women to take care of everything else. Gaining the vote for American women, known as woman suffrage, was the single largest enfranchisement and extension of democratic rights in our nation’s history. Along

The battle for suffrage was a long and slow process. Many women tried to initiate the fight for suffrage, like Alice Paul and Lucy Burns. “These were the New Suffragists: women who were better educated, more career-oriented, younger, less apt to be married and more cosmopolitan than their previous generation.” (pg 17) Eventually, in 1920, the 19th amendment was ratified; allowing women to vote, but it was not any one person or event that achieved this great feat. It was the confluence of certain necessary factors, the picketing and parades led by Alice Paul, militaristic suffrage parties and the influence of the media that caused the suffrage amendment to be passed and ratified in 1920. But most importantly, they successfully moved both

3. Urban industrialism dislocated women’s lives no less than men’s. Like men, women sought political change and organized to promote issues central to their lives, campaigning for temperance and woman suffrage., Susan B. Anthony, launched the National Woman Suffrage Association in 1869, demanding the vote for women suffrage, though not yet generally supported, was no longer considered a crackpot idea. Thanks to the WCTU’s support of the “home protection” ballot, suffrage had become accepted as a means to an end even when it was not embraced as a woman’s natural right.

Susan B. Anthony was born February 15, 1820 in Adams, Massachusetts. Susan B. Anthony was an active woman suffragist who played a big part in the women's rights movement, in 1852. She didn’t only fight for women's rights, she also fought to abolish slavery. Both Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton also helped with social reform. They founded the National Woman Suffrage Association.

Three Years after “Speech before Congress” was delivered by Carrie Chapman Catt, a well-known leader of the women 's suffragist movement were women granted the right to vote and receive all rights as citizens. Catt’s speech was a major stepping stone for Congress to pass the 19th amendment. She was able to deliver her speech in a manner, which was persuasive to congress because it encompassed all the rhetorical appeals. Not only did she describe benefits to enfranchising women, she also spoke to the patriotism of her audience to further her cause. Catt crafted her argument by presenting herself with authority and knowledge, she also used undeniable logic by referring historical precedence, and she evoked sympathy in her audience by describing the trials of disenfranchised women to create a powerful argument.

In the summer of eighteen forty-eight two women Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B Anthony who founded the National Women’s Suffrage Association in eighteen sixty-nine met with a small group of people determined to give women a larger sphere of action than the laws and customs of that day allowed (Taylor 13). At this time in our country women were denied the right to vote, made to give their husbands the land and property which they may have control of, plus nearly no say in legal or professional matters. To give you an idea of what the women were up against on July thirtieth, eighteen sixty-eight a group lead by T.H. Mundine wrote a declaration stating that all persons meeting age, residences, and citizenship requirements be deemed qualified electors “without distinction of sex” (Taylor 14). This motion was referred to the state of Texas and in January eighteen sixty-nine, it was rejected on a vote of fifty-two – thirteen. The motion that was shot down was not anything to major by today’s standards. It was a simple bill to allow women to have a more reasonable portion of the burdens of government (Taylor 14). As this example illustrates women had a huge wall to climb of they wanted to be even with men in societies eyes.

In “Address to Congress on Women’s Suffrage,” women’s suffrage is recognized. Carrie Chapman is giving a speech to men stating that suffrage is inevitable. She illuminates three main points that develop her theme. First, the history of the country, second, the suffrage for women already established in the US already makes suffrage of the nation inevitable, and third, leadership of the US democracy compels enfranchisement of their women. For the first point, the text states, “The American Revolutionists boldly proclaimed the heresies : “Taxation without

In the nineteenth century, civil rights were becoming a topic of discussion, as more and more people decided that inequality wasn't okay. Slaves had been emancipated a few years before the issue of the female voice in politics was acknowledged. Women were beginning to have more rights and independence. They were now able to own their own property and a federal law for equal pay for equal work was passed. However, there were still revisions to be made. In 1888, Isabella Beecher Hooker went before the International Council of Women to discuss why women should be granted suffrage. Preceding her address, an unnamed individual went before the Senate's Committee on Privileges and Elections in response to a proposed constitutional amendment that would give women a right to vote in 1878. Both of these passages have very different takes on the subjects, one is for and one is against women being granted suffrage, but they both agree on one thing: female's ability to defend the country.

National holidays are special days celebrated around the country honoring an important or revolutionary person or event. If Congress were to make a new national holiday, the holiday should celebrate Susan B. Anthony and all the work she has done to express equality in the United States of America. Susan B. Anthony would be a fit the qualities needed to be accepted as a national holiday worthy person. Susan B. Anthony fought for many causes such as; women’s rights, the abolishment of slavery, and equal education. She is also very well known in the country as a famous woman activist. Anthony also risked a lot while fighting for what she knew to be right for herself as well as the greater good.

You can deal with whatever you are played, just like Susan B. Anthony. Susan was a quacker. Quackers believed in being free and no slavery or conflict. Susan stuck with her quaker traits and started the National Suffrage Association with Elizabeth Stanton. Ms. Anthony stood up to women’s rights and their suffrage.

This new generation of activists fought with this new agenda for almost 20 years until a few states in the West began to extend the vote to women. The Eastern and Southern states still refused to give in, but this didn’t stop the National American Woman Suffrage Association. In 1916, Carrie Chapman Catt, president of the NAWSA, worked vigorously to get women’s organizations from all over the country together and fight side by side. “One group of activists, led by Alice Paul and her National Woman’s Party, lobbied for full quality for women under the law” (Divine). She used mass marches and hunger strikes as strategies, but she was eventually forced to resign because of her insistence on the use of militant direct-action tactics (Grolier). Finally, during World War 1, women were given more opportunities to work, and were able to show that they were just as deserving as men when it came to the right to vote. On August 18th, 1920, the 19th amendment was ratified, allowing women to vote. This drawn-out and arduous battle opened a new window of opportunity for women all over the country. Significant changes in both social life and job availability began to create what is now referred to as the “new women.”

In Susan B. Anthony’s speech “Is it a Crime for a Citizen of the United States to Vote” she uses several historical figures to help support her argument about giving women the right to vote. She knew women were being discriminated against because of their gender and refused to take it. In her speech, she chose to support her argument about women’s right to vote. People in this time period viewed women as citizens, but only when it came to certain aspects. One of these aspects did not include the right to vote.

The ‘sengyo shufu – sarariman’ (fulltime housewife – salaryman) gender norms ultimately arose following World War Two. This essay argues that this gender norm was promoted due to Japan’s aims of economic prosperity after their surrender. Both of these roles complement and influence the other, making it difficult for Japan to ultimately move away from these constrictive and ingrained gender roles. The ‘fullltime housewife’ serves to prop up its male counterpart of ‘salaryman’ and the desire to not be seen as lower class, and is encouraged by the blocked career paths and discouragement from Japanese society as a whole. The ‘salaryman’ aims to be the sole breadwinner of the ‘nuclear family’ household and is influenced by the insidious promotion

It is no secret that for centuries, the Japanese woman has been, to most observers, a model of elegance and graceful beauty. A picture of a kimono-clad, modest, and often silent woman has been plastered everywhere, allowing for the upmost passive subjection. If we look deeper into this image of woman, can we tell if this picture is complete? How do these women painted in representative images far in the modern world? The ideal woman in Japan is expected to be both a good wife, and a wise mother. Though these seem like reasonable expectations, there is a much deeper meaning to them that has shown signs of being outdated. During the 1800’s and 1900’s, women were subjected to society’s vision of them, and could not break free for fear of the