Susan Glaspell 's A Jury Of Her Peers

Glaspell’s attempt to rationalize the murder is evident in the title, “A Jury of Her Peers.” The point she is trying to make is that under the early twentith century judiciary system, it is her opinion that a woman could not get a fair trial. She is of course referring to the standard of the day that a jury be composed of only males. In fact, a jury composed of women, she conjects, would quite possibly acquit a murderess wife of all charges, given favorable circumstances, as the two women unofficially did in the story. After all, according to Glaspell, they are like her, of her, and can understand her plight.

Hale, and Mrs. Peters. Mr. Hale was the first one to visit the Wright home after the murder, so the sheriff immediately questions him. Because this is a play the actors have to talk to each other, so the audience knows what’s going on. Another way that the play goes into an action way is the aloofness of Mrs. Wright. Whenever Mr. Hale was being questioned he mentioned his encounter with Mrs. Wright saying that he would ask where her husband was, and she wouldn’t respond and just sit there in her chair and knit. The men then go on to criticize Mrs. Wright’s housekeeping, after the men leave the women say, “I’d hate to have men coming into my kitchen, snooping around and criticizing” (561). The short story has the same sentence except the short story surrounds that statement with an explanation of some of Mrs. Hale’s thoughts. For example, Mrs. Hale is described as having felt a strange feeling “then, as if releasing something strange, Mrs. Hale began to rearrange the dirt pans under the sink” (573). The play cannot provide description of emotions but shows them through action. “A Jury of her

Although “A Jury of Her Peers” and “Trifles” are similar in plot, Mustazza’s article, “Generic Translation and Thematic Shift in Susan Glaspell’s ‘Trifles’ and ‘A Jury of Her Peers’” highlights the differences and similarities between the two. Mustazza’s article may help aid readers to understand the differences between Glaspell’s two works and provide understanding as to why Glaspell may have changed the genre and form of the plot. “Trifles” is a dramatic play whereas “A Jury of Her Peers” is prose fiction. While some differences may be seen on the surface, other differences will need to be inspected closely. Mustazza’s article may help one to understand Glaspell’s works by providing analysis and additional perspectives on both “A Jury of her Peers” and “Trifles”.

In Susan Glaspell’s, “A Jury of her Peers”, it is the women who take center stage and captivate the reader’s emotions. Throughout the feministic short story, which was written in 1917, several repeating patterns and symbols help the audience to gain a deeper understanding of the difficulty of prairie life for women and of the bond that women share. The incredible cunning the women in the story demonstrate provides insight into the innate independence that women had even during days of deep sexual discrimination. In “A Jury of her Peers”, the hardships women of the early twentieth century must endure and the sisterhood that they can still manage to maintain are manifested as a mysterious, small-town murder unfolds.

In “A Jury of Her Peers” by Susan Glaspell, Minnie Foster Wright is the main character, even though the reader never sees Mrs. Wright. The story begins as Mrs. Hale joins the county attorney, Mr. Henderson; the sheriff, Mr. Peters; Mrs. Peters; and her husband in a “big two-seated buggy” (188). The team men are headed the Wright house to investigate Mr. Wright’s murder. Mrs. Peters is going along to gather some belongings for Mrs. Wright, who is currently being held in jail, and Mrs. Hale has been asked to accompany Mrs. Peters. As the investigation is conducted throughout the story, the reader is given a sense of how women were treated during this time and insight into why the women ultimately keep evidence from the men.

“A Jury of Her Peers,” is a story about a farmer’s wife who is accused of murdering her husband. Referred to fundamentally as a writer, Glaspell's short fiction went to a great extent unnoticed until 1973 when her short story, "A Jury of Her Peers" was rediscovered. Despite the fact that the creator of forty-three short stories, Glaspell's "A Jury of Her Peers" is her most broadly anthologized bit of short fiction and is dependent upon a real court case Glaspell secured as a news person for the Des Moines Daily. The story, which she acclimates from her one-enactment play Trifles in 1917, has pulled in the consideration of feminist researchers for its medication of sexual orientation related topics. On its surface, "A

Twentieth century society places few stereotypical roles on men and women.  The men are not the sole breadwinners, as they once were, and the women are no longer the sole homemakers.  The roles are often reversed, or, in the case of both parents working, the old roles are totally inconsequential.  Many works of literature deal with gendered roles and their effect on society as a whole or on an individual as a person.  "A Jury Of Her Peers" and Trifles, both written by Susan Glaspell, are works of literature that deal with socially gendered roles during the early nineteenth century.  The two works are almost exactly alike in that the dialogue from "A Jury Of Her

“A Jury of Her Peers” is a short story written by Susan Glaspell in 1917 illustrates early feminist literature. The two female characters, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale, is able to solve the mystery of who the murderer of John Wright while their male counterparts could not. This short story had been adapted from Glaspell’s one-act play Trifles written the previous year. The play consists of the same characters and plotline as the story. In both works, Glaspell depicts how the men, Sheriff Peters and Mr. Hale, disregard the most important area in the house, the kitchen, when it comes to their investigation. In the end, the women are the ones who find clues that lead to the conclusion of Minnie Wright, John Wright’s wife, is the one who murdered him. Both of Glaspell’s female characters illustrate the ability to step into a male dominated profession by taking on the role of detective. According to Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide, written by Lois Tyson, a reader-response critique “focuses on readers’ response to literary texts” and it’s a diverse area (169). Through a reader-response criticism from a feminist lens, we are able to analyze how “A Jury of Her Peers” and Trifles depict how a patriarchal society oppresses women in the early twentieth century, gender stereotypes confined both men and women and the emergence of the New Woman is illustrated.

Susan Glaspell's short story, A Jury of Her Peers, was written long before the modern women's movement began, yet her story reveals, through Glaspell's use of symbolism, the role that women are expected to play in society. Glaspell illustrates how this highly stereotypical role can create oppression for women and also bring harm to men as well.

A social criticism in these detective fiction stories from the 19th century is feminists fighting for equality. These stories had men that had expectations of women already, and even when the women would try to help the men, they would assume that the women had no idea about anything involving the crime. They believed women were just wasting time on silly things. Just like in “A Jury of Her Peers” written by Susan Glaspell, Wright is accused of murdering her husband. While five people come to her house, the sheriff, his wife, one of the Mrs.Wright neighbors, his wife, and a county prosecutor. The men are looking for evidence to use against her. The women are collecting personal effects to bring to Mrs.Wright. But they find details that the men couldn’t have found or even noticed. For example, Mrs. Hale was fixing up a sewing that Mrs.Wright did not do well, Mrs. Hale said she did not stitch one or two well. She believed that Mrs.Wright was nervous about something because of the pattern of the sewing, she started off very good and then you can almost see a string being sewed in with frightness. Mrs. Hale explained “the sewing… All the rest of them have been so nice and even but this one. Why it looks as if she did not know what she was about!” (Glaspell 154) Mrs.Hale is probably asking herself why was Mrs.Wright nervous? What could have she heard that made her frightened, or what had happened for her to be frightened enough to mess up her great sewing pattern.

To begin with, “A Jury of her Peers” is about the way women in 1917 were treated by men. The main women characters are Minnie Wright, Mrs. Peters, and Mrs. Hale. The women in the story are confined to their homes; rarely getting to go to town or visit with their friends. The women did not have many

In “A Jury of her Peers,” Glaspell makes it clear from the beginning using characterization that Mrs. Peters, who is the sheriff’s wife and one of the three female characters featured in the story, is bound to her roles and stereotypes. Glaspell writes that “the sheriff came running in to say his wife wished Mrs. Hale would come too — adding, with a grin, that he guessed she

Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters both understand and get to know each other by piecing together the crime scene and also looking at Mrs. Wright’s empty house. By the women noticing details and Mrs. Wright’s living conditions, they can see how sad and what little enjoyment Mrs. Wright had in her home. Mrs. Hale says, “It never seemed a very cheerful place," and later on she says, "But I don't think a place would be any the cheerfuller for John Wright's bein' in it.", she is revealing the atmosphere that the home had (Glaspell 5). The home was certainly not cheerful, but not

Susan Glaspell created a significant scene with a short story based on a play written in 1916. A Jury of Her Peers reveals a setting of Dickson County in March, when a farmers lonely wife allegedly murdered her husband and a team of investigators and their wives assembled to search for motive. Women of the time were oppressed and striving to find their way in society while continuing to uphold their family name and producing acceptable households . America was surging ahead to World War I and women that had to hold the home front together found themselves in new situations that brought stress and anguish. Women were gaining rights to work, rights to vote and opportunities to become better educated alongside their male counterparts but had a lengthy journey ahead in standards of equality. A woman at the turn of the century typically would not have been as educated as Glaspell and especially not as well written. She gained success on levels from writing published short stories to plays and traveling. She shared success with her husband throughout their lives. Her work was varied and Encyclopedia Britannica explains, her work showed “…a wide stylistic range, from psychological realism to Symbolism and Expressionism” (1). Susan Glaspell’s A Jury of Her Peers, exhibits how feminism created a new mindset for women that had formerly yielded to clichés of females in the home, workplace and community, however covering another woman’s cause to murder pushes characters to

In eighteenth century and the nineteenth century the life of ladies was extremely troublesome contrasted with introduce. There were numerous limitations over them. The sexual orientation separation was the primary concern that was honed in that period. The lady was not given the equivalent rights as man. The fundamental part of lady amid that time was as they grow up wed in their position have children and sustain and support the infant. The rank framework was extremely strict around then, and this was the fundamental inconvenience to lady around then. The difference of this can be seen the stories like "A Jury of Her Peers" and "Slopes Like