Swot Analysis Of Coca Cola Company

For more than a century, Coca Cola and PepsiCo have been the major competitors within the soft drink market. By employing various advertising tactics, strategies such as blind taste tests, and reward initiatives for the consumer, they have grown to become oligopolistic rivals. In the soft-drink business, “The Coca-Cola Company” and “PepsiCo, Incorporated” hold most of the market shares in virtually every region of the world. They have brands that the consumers want, whether it be soft-drink brands or in PepsioCo’s case, snacks. With only one soft-drink market, the two competitors have no choice but to increase sales by stealing the other competitor’s clients. This led to the term, the “cola wars” which was first used

Introducing a new product to the market is a very risky operation. Not only is it risky but it takes time, effort and money. In order for a product to be successful, it had to fully undergo the product life cycle. Kellogg’s has an advantage when it comes to the breakfast market as it holds the biggest market share. After providing the British public with breakfast for years, it most certainly has a larger customer loyalty base. The strong brand makes it easy for product launching as the public are already familiar with the brand. However, introducing a new product comes with its challenges and risks. Looking at the ratios, Kellogg’s has a current ratio to date of 1:1.1 . This in financial terms rings alarm bells as it shows that the company will struggle to pay its short term obligations. Kellogg’s however can operate on a low current test ratio as it has a good long term revenues coming into the business. This means that it is possible to borrow on this basis to meet its current obligation. After calculating the net present value, which gave a positive NPV of £38450million, I move that we go ahead with the introduction of a new product. In traducing a new product is a sign of innovation and growth on the part of the competitors. In order for a new product to be introduced to the market, Kellogg’s will have to spend money on the actual product, the marketing side of

The company known as Coca-Cola today was started in September of 1919, but the first Coke brand was served as early as 1886. Since that time it has grown to be one of the most globally recognized brand names with a stock value of $167 billion. Coke’s plan has always been developed with the future in mind. Right away the company realized that it was more profitable to manufacture the concentrate used to make carbonated drinks than to bottle it. From that point on they saw the entire world, not simply the originating country, as their desired market. It seems only practical that the company should pursue this agenda until conquered then focus the effort on expanding into different product lines. This logical

The Coca Cola company is perceived to be the most famous trademark on the globe, and it is equally so. The company claims more than 400 brands that appeal to a wide range of individuals throughout the world. They are in a position to fulfill needs of every one of their buyers making their experience with their beverages a better one. The entity’s drinks entice a lot of people across all races, age, and gender. Coca Cola is outstanding for its overall popularity as its items are sold in over four hundred countries in the world, while major contenders like Pepsi are just available in very few countries. Such a competitive advantage has placed

Soda Pop Organics Company was established in 2001 and has its headquarters in Washington, USA. The firm manufactures soft drinks and so far it has employed more than 120 000 individuals. The company began as a local stand which just operated in Washington. The local farmers found a need to establish a cooperative so as to equally share the production costs, costs associated with bottling as well as revenue. Through the cooperative, the farmers were able to increase their revenues which enabled them to expand the growing areas, buy farming equipment which are sustainable and at the same time, increase ownership of the farmers in the corporation by investing in other local farms. Soda Pop Organics began to be traded on the U.S stock exchange in 2005 after being incorporated.

In an industry dominated by two heavyweight contenders, Coke and Pepsi, in fact, between 1996 and 2004 per capita consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSD) remained between 52 to 54 gallons per year. Consumption grew by an average of 3% per year over the next three decades. Fueling this growth were the increasing availability of CSD, the introduction of diet and flavored varieties, and brand extensions. There is couple of reasons why the industry is so profitable such as market share, availability and diversity and brand name and world class marketing.

Another important weakness is that the company’s products are seen as a major cause of obesity. (Melser, 2013) The beverage sales are affected by various factors including change in trends and preferences. Recently, beverage sales have fallen because of people’s increased preference for the health drinks. Around the world, obesity is a major problem and the Coca Cola products are seen as a major cause of obesity. As people are getting health conscious they are moving towards low calorie healthy drinks. This affects coca cola’s profitability and popularity. However, the brand can overcome this situation by increasing the number of low calorie products in its brand portfolio. It will need to add more healthy choices for its customers in its product portfolio.

This paper focuses on global business strategy of The Coca-Cola Company, who is the leader in the beverage industry as well as, the world?s leading soft drink maker that operates in more than 200 countries and owns or licenses 400 brands of nonalcoholic beverages. The paper will concentrate on the PESTEL analysis of the organization focusing on the external factors of the business and the environment where it operates. All of the following environments will be discusses in the research; Political, Economic, Sociological, Technological, Legal, and Environmental as they the changes in the market segment. Within this paper it will discuss some of thr

“Coca-Cola brands are available to consumers throughout the world. Today they account for 1.7 billion servings of all beverages consumed worldwide daily. Coca-Cola has the edge in the market and because they are first to capitalize on new consumer trends. They continue to focus on continuous operating improvements, and they are ever changing to meet market demands. Pepsi Co satisfies the needs of its customers with the wide variety of products offered. They also have the different type of beverage or snack and its brands can substitute for each other. Coco-Cola and Pepsi Co is known as the top 100 most valuable brands in the world.

What is the definition of triple bottom line and does Coca-Cola have this triple bottom line? This is a question many would think relates to financial statistics and tremendously high revenue earnings. Not even close to the true meaning. Triple bottom line (TBL) has three distinctive frameworks or bottom lines consisting of the (1) profit bottom line, (2) people bottom line, and (3) and the planet bottom line or simply put it means; the three P’s – profit, people, and planet (Unknown, 2009). This concept is at the core of Coca-Cola in their ability to accurate measure monetary, community, and environmental performances or unmask weaknesses to correct with a strategic plan. In completing a SWOT analysis for The Coca-Cola Company, the three P’s are relevant in daily operations and globally during joint ventures with other partners. Now, this essay will uncover each bottom line in detail within The Coca-Cola Company and state how the company specifically addresses as a strength, weakness, opportunity, or threat. The first area of discuss advances a helping hand to stimulate the additional two distinctive bottom lines – the profits.

Despite being a billion dollar 125 year company that is a household name around the world, Coca-Cola has had to cope with unexpected situations and variation of positioning based upon the main competitions movements, Pepsi. According to Trout and Reis, (2001, p. 10) “Truth is irrelevant. What matters are the perceptions that exist in the mind.” This is a thinking process called outside-in

As society becomes more health conscious, domestic consumers are looking for healthier products. Increasing public concern of health issues, such as obesity, poses new challenges for the carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry, which has experienced declining growth in demand for recent years (Exhibit 1). As the United States has been Coca-Cola’s largest source of revenues by country and the company relies heavily on its domestic CSD market, this trend threatens the company’s future profitability. Coca Cola must dedicate more resources to the emerging markets of Asia in order to capture

According to PepsiCo SWOT, “it is better equipped to satisfy the needs of customers with a wide variety of successful products” (2008). PepsiCo managed to present almost every type of drink and food brands. The merchandise that is earned is the majority of their revenue. This makes them extremely at risk to change any of their marketing products. However

Despite temporary financial setback, this expansion provides Coca-Cola many opportunities. For instance, through strategic acquisition, Coca-Cola extended its services and products to Africa, Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina, in 2016 (Company Profile: The Coca-Cola Co., 2017). The company is planning more agreements and acquisitions, strengthening its market control. Moreover, this tactic increases the company’s capabilities and resources to better meet the growing global demand for products. Major threats for Coca-Cola include the health advocacy programs to fight obesity, diabetes, and other conditions by reducing the consumption of sweetened beverages (Curbing Global Sugar Consumption, 2015). This has lead to reduction of sales, more stringent regulations, and increases in production costs through taxes, ingredient changes, and regulation oversight. This threat impacts the overall profitability of the company.

The global beverages industry is currently a low-growth market, with an expected compound annual growth rate of 5.7% between 2017 and 2025 (Grand View Research 2017). Additionally, the industry is quite saturated with firms that offer increasingly differentiated products. However, due to this low growth rate, companies have been engaging in price competition to gain competitive advantage and increase their market share. Nevertheless, Coca Cola is a dominant force in this market, controlling 40% of the industry, and is therefore at a low risk of losing its position.