Synthesis Essay On Fair Use

In today’s society, internet plays a pivotal role, influencing individuals in all classes, of all ages, and in various financial backgrounds. Because the Net dominates a large portion of the population’s time, many people have become accustomed to its current policies and ease of access to different types of media. So when consumers were threatened with the possibility of change, an enthusiastic reaction occurred worldwide. Internet users today are acclimated to downloading or torrenting music, games, and movies that would normally have a fee, for free, infringing the media’s copyrights in the process. Due to the rapid growth in this illicit activity, legislations such as SOPA, PIPA, and ACTA have been proposed; however they have been met

Copyright laws have been in place for over two hundred years.  They are meant to protect from the unauthorized and unlawful use of ideas and media under law, and protect the artist’s integrity. The types of media protected ranges from books to movies, from TV to picture art. In it’s own way, copyright laws have affected society and how media is distributed across the world.

The music industry has developed in a series of technological advances, from the development of vinyl to the digitization of music and the creation of formats such as compact disc (CD), digital audiotape, and minidisk (Leyshon 2001). Although the digitized music facilitates consumers, it causes the appearance of piracy and the drop of sales. The subject of piracy has occurred for a certain period. Since 1920's, music piracy has appeared into the world with the production of cassette tapes, voice recorders, and CDs, which brought a new kind of event to court. Moreover, music piracy has become a worldwide issue due to the development of downloading music via the internet.

The digital revolution has been one of the most important causes in control of piracy. As the arrival of the digital revolution, it has become not difficult to copy digital information without losing in its features. One more significant cause has been the introduction of the Internet, a commercial Internet protocol that has basically opened the front gate to low cost worldwide sharing. A third facilitator has been the fast growth of high speed internet. Developments in broadband technology have permitted people to upload and download enormous files fast. The existence of these three causes has become a ‘perfect storm’ for illegal downloading. As a result this could considerably destroy market progression and sustainability of companies. (Sudler, 2013).

Digital Rights Management is very necessary and important. I think that DRM should up to the content publisher, and just make sure any competitors cannot copy all content.

Internet piracy is a major problem that been brought by the advancement with the Internet, and it affects not only just one area but across multiple different fields worldwide, including movies, tv dramas, music and software industries. The biggest impact come with copyright infringement is economic damage, film piracy was estimated to cost the economy up to $18.5 billion annually in Hollywood production (Bialik, 2013), and the number raised to $20.5 billion to the industry (Gibbs, 2014) while still increasing to nowadays.

The rise of the Internet era opened the whole new market for traditional media full of opportunities as well as threats. Online piracy being one of them because the music and film industry loses £5.4bn in a year and if it was reduced by 10% it could have created up to 13 thousand jobs in the UK. There are various attempts taken to fight with online piracy; a case study of Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement will be considered as well as other legislations attempting to regulate copyrights in the Internet. This

In this essay I am going to discuss why copyright laws are important in today’s business world and why copying software and other resources is called “piracy”.

Technology, now incorporated into almost every aspect of life, is constantly evolving. Technology being so incorporated in daily life has caused some issues to come up in the past; one of the most controversial uses of technology is file sharing. File sharing is the exchange of files over computer networks. These files include all types of media, software, and books. While some file sharing is legal, there are illegal downloads of copyrighted property widely available; there are intense debates about the level of protection of intellectual properties that should be used for these files. The increase of sharing copyrighted media over the internet has led to many lawsuits and court battles (Oberholzer‐Gee and Strumpet). The sharing of files

The internet is one of the greatest and most significant inventions of the 20th century. It has become the biggest data foundation to receive all kinds of information, particularly knowledge related to education and improving one’s skills. Downloads are needed in order to receive data from computer networks which are remote systems, typically a server. Copyrighted content needs to have appropriate permission to download it and without this permission doing so could constitute copyright infringement. According to Towers (2009), on-line piracy generally refers to sharing over the internet copies of works that are not authorised or illegal downloading of software, movies, videogames and music. Illicit downloads started through hacked

It was 17th century philosopher John Locke who popularized the idea that the ideal government’s principle duty was to protect the material property of its citizens, but perhaps just as important to the health of a nation, is the protection of the citizen’s intellectual property. Without the protection of intellectual property innovators and artists would have no rights to their creations, therefore no incentive to create new works. To protect these men and women, lawmakers drafted some of the most important pieces of legislation in our nation’s history: copyright law. Copyright law guarantees that the rights to a creative work are held by the creator. This means that works that fall under copyright cannot be sold or reproduced without the creator’s consent. This gives creators the security that their assets will not be stolen, and thus, creates and environment that encourages new innovation, and fosters artistic expression. However, copyright law today is deeply flawed, often achieving the opposite of its original goals. Today, both individuals and large corporations use copyright law as a tool to stifle competition, and remove works that they object to. From this, we have been left with a copyright system that fails to protect people from false copyright takedown claims on the internet, that has copyright terms that are much too long to be reasonably justified, and that does not guarantee the rights that are promised under fair use. To solve these shortcomings, it is

The internet completely changed the business of copyright infringement. While the internet makes it easier to identify copyright violations, it also enables those same violators to a previously unprecedented degree. This is

In recent years copyright laws have been in effect to strike a balance between protecting the rights of authors, artist and copyright owners, and according to the U.S. Constitution, to “promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts.” Digital technology, unlike analog technology that preceded it, can make large copies in real-time without the degradation in quality. However, as a response to these capabilities of digital technology, policymakers had to create a system of digital rights management (DRM) and other technical deterrents where digital content owners could exert control over media usage. In response to these complex issues, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) of 1998 was passed.

The introduction of the Internet to society resulted in the opportunity for people to produce, consume and share creative content. This culture of online production and consumption is bound to copyright and fair use laws. While these laws have the capacity to protect an individual’s ownership of intellectual property and creative content, they are not conducive to a vibrant culture of creativity. The Internet and its evolution of search engine engagement has cultivated an online community that can only thrive when copyright and fair use laws are not as restrictive as they are in their current state. (Samuelson 1994). Collins (2014) states that copyright fosters a permission culture that is censorial, monopolistic and detrimental to free creative expression. The “Creative Commons” license is a positive alternative to current copyright laws. The positive outcomes of the practice of Creative Commons when compared with the outcomes of copyright laws highlights the restrictive nature of copyright in it’s current state. By looking at the past and present digital landscape, the surge in the creation of online content and using examples of copyright infringement cases, this essay will explore the ways in which copyright laws limit and stifle creativity.

Widespread use and ease of access to high-speed internet connections, powerful computers, and portable software devices have changed the way people obtain songs, videos, TV shows, and books. File-sharing and DVR service have increased the ease at which TV shows and music can be uploaded to the internet and shared with other for free. Although these TV shows and music files are illegal to share it the current laws against those who supply and download these digital files have almost no effect on users because of the scarcity in frequency in