Synthesis Essay: The Usage Of Military Robots

Singer describes Iraq operations as they were being performed in 2008 with the threat of Improvised Explosive Devices, IEDs. “The Explosive Ordnance Disposal, EOD, teams were tasked with defeating this threat, roving about the battlefield to find and defuse the IEDs before they could explode and kill.” 3 Robots such as Packbot and Talon were used to disarm IEDs which save lives of Soldiers and civilians. The proliferation of technology in the battlefield can be seen in today’s combat environment on the ground, sea and air and will continue to grow. He states that “man’s monopoly of warfare is being broken” because digital weapons such as Packbot, Talon, SWORDS, Predator, Global Hawk and many others are a “sign” that “we are entering the era of robots of war.” 4 He supports his theory of the proliferation of technology in weapons by looking at industry growth by providing quantifiable data of rapid growth in industry to meet demands. As he states “in 1999, there were nine companies with federal contracts in homeland security. By 2003, there were 3,512. In 2006, there were 33,890.” 5 Mr. Singer then provides a history of robots, trends, and what we can expect in the future. The book also provides a glimpse of what the author believes can be expected on future battlefields and changes that he thinks U.S. policy makers and military leaders need to address. Some of the changes that can be affected concern law of war, robots role in war, level of robot authority to fight wars and robot

With Robots becoming a popular part of our everyday lives people are beginning to question if people are treating robots with the same respect that they treat people with. Researchers are also beginning to wonder if there need to be laws to protect robots from being tortured or even killed. Scientists have done research to test and see if people react the same to robots as they would to actual people or animals. In Is it Okay to Torture or Murder a Robot Richard Fisher contemplates the reason on why it is wrong to hurt or kill a robot by using a stern and unbiased tone.

This article begins by outlining the tragic death of an artificial intelligence robot, named Steve. Steve’s accidental death, by stairs, raises a lot of new questions surrounding robots, and their rights. In his article, Leetaru, discusses the range of questions that have sparked from not only Steve’s death, but the rise of advanced robot mechanics. While the Silicon Valley is busy grinding out new plans and models of robots, especially security robots, how can we establish what a mechanical robot is entitled to? Leetaru offers many different scenarios concerning robots against aggressors, in hopes to reveal that these rights be outlined with the rise in usage of this technology. The article speculates how in the future, when these robots

Gen. Milley discusses that with these increases nations that have these robotic capabilities make be willing to take more risks. This would create the potential for risk-averse nations

Technology has continuously advanced throughout the decades and we have seen advances in military weaponry, telecommunication, social networks, healthcare/medical, automobile engineering, and aerospace. In light of several technological advancements previously stated, the invention of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has evolved tremendously, and provided tactical advantages for both the military and law enforcement in numerous critical situations. The use of drones received both criticism and praise for what it is capable of. First and foremost, drones are not solely used as “killing machines”. A drone is a form of surveillance and dataveillance system, and is used for nonlethal purposes since the 1950s (Carpenter & Shaikhouni, 2011).

At least two scholarly sources from the Ashford University library (not including your textbook) with in-text citations utilized within your paragraphs are required. Two new sources should be utilized each week to meet the minimum of eight required sources for the final

Over the past few decades, military equipment has received major technological advancements and has been reaching new heights. Modern improvements to technology have almost entirely changed the outlook we have on war. Robots have proven beneficial in carrying out dangerous tasks that involve casualties, but questions arise when robots are used to carry out missions that involve maintaining peace. More specifically, robots in war.

One of the key concepts in changing force employment is the creation of a more flexible force capable of responding to complex situations while maintaining security and working to achieve the Army’s goals of seizing, retain and exploit . One example of such a robot is the Mobile Detection Assessment

The Defense Science Board’s 2016 Summer Study on Autonomy is a wide-ranging discussion of how the department can more quickly and effectively adopt autonomous capabilities in support of rapid decision making, performing dangerous missions, and handling high volume data. The recommendations address technical engineering, design, and acquisition challenges, but also less structured issues such as governance for systems, relationship to the Law of War, and trust. Out of 26 major recommendations, one stands out as fundamentally distinct—the need to develop an autonomy-literate workforce. It is an acknowledgement that “American military forces, formerly equipped with largely electro-mechanical platforms, are now fielding systems that are dependent on software for combat effectiveness. This technology shift has placed a huge demand on education and training to provide qualified people…”

Another big ethical issue raised in the move is whether or not robots could be used to fight wars. This ethical issue just likes the other in the fact that it revolves on the lack of emotional or compassion component of the robots. Robots can be programed for the protection of individuals but because of their lack of compassion or emotion they would not know when to stop the attack.

Lowry, Rich. "The Great Drone Panic." National Review 6 July 2012: n. pag. Rpt. in Robotic Technology. Ed. Louise Gerdes. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven, 2014. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 3 Sept. 2015.

A Robotic Minesweeper stopped a bomb that killed thousands of troops. It is a normal military vehicle with a mine roller that can clear convoys without a human driver. A module containing software and multiple sensors could work with other vehicles, this technology could make any military vehicle into a robot that will be able to work tirelessly through the rain, snow, dust, and darkness. The robotic vehicles would play many roles for the military in supply convoys, airfield construction, and similar operations. So, the U.S. military will have supply convoys that are mostly robotic vehicles like minesweepers and supply trucks.(Hsu)

What image comes to mind when one hears the words “Killer Robot”? If one visualises the laser-wielding android in Terminator 2 which threatens to overpower its defenceless human adversaries, one would not be too far from the truth[1]. Today, advanced robots capable of engaging a human target autonomously are no longer confined to fiction but are instead rapidly becoming a reality.

This technology is still under development. But how will autonomous robots change military tactics? Many experts agree and disagree on using them on the battlefield. Because robots don 't have human thinking and they don 't behave ethically, but some expert agrees that these technologies will change military tactics. When the United States went to war in Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003, American ground forces arrived without the support of robotic weapons. A decade later, U.S. forces had deployed more than 6,000 ground robots to aid with surveillance and bomb detection and destruction. Robots will be more effective than humans. Because they don 't sleep, eat and they won 't need time to rest. Since there robots, they don 't need to train for long period of time. They won 't be affected by the weather.A good example is an unmanned vehicle commonly known as drones. These drones can operate in land, air and sea. Through the use of this drones the military already changing its military tactics instead of sending soldiers they can send drones to attack or to scan the area for the potential threat which can save a soldier 's life.

Those unmanned robots likewise spare lives considering the fact that they preserve people from entering the dangerous situation before they recognize what is in store. For instance, robots have turned out to be progressively critical for examining and looking into perilous and unsafe conditions. These robots are equipped for getting into a dynamic spring of gushing lava to collect statistics or an eating operating to search for casualties.