Synthetic Biological Engineering Essay

Every twelve months, more than 100 million creatures are executed in U.S. research facilities for chemical, medication, food, and cosmetics testing; science lessons; and interest driven experimentations (“Medical Testing on Animals Is Cruel And Unnecessary” 1). Some people are convinced that testing medicines on animals is needed so that one day, there may be

“Do-it-yourself biology” or “DIY biology” is a social movement rooted in the idea of citizen science. Usually called biohacking, emphasizing the relationship with hacker culture, this form of public engagement in science has been the subject of controversy since its inception.

Humans are on a constant quest in the search for perfection and advancement in all areas of life through progressive scientific knowledge. From such a stance, the future of humans appears boundless with all the potential possibilities biotechnology provides, but such developments will cause ethical, social and biological implications.

Seven months before the publish of Escape from Spiderhead, the first artificial life was created in US. Unlike Dolly the sheep, this is not the kind of artificial life from cloning but is created out of nothing but an “an entirely synthetic genome that was constructed from chemicals in the laboratory” (Sample). This finding has caused great reaction from the public and doubtlessly the experiment was challenged with “morality” and “playing god”. It is not difficult to image that there must be people who jump out and shout for their worries of any possible uncontrolled cases. According

Every year, over one hundred million animals are killed in labs all around the world. Countless more have been deliberately injured or injected with cocktails

Now in this day and age biological threats and warfare are at an risk of all time high and the Project Bioshield Act will protect the United States of America from these threats. On July, 10, 2010, the House of Representatives created a bill that would withdraw two billion dollars from Project Bioshield to pay for a boost in development for other federal programs. Even though the money was not cut from Project Bioshield it showed us that the project is in danger of not getting the amount of money it really needs to protect the United States of America. The United States government should invest more money into Project BioShield in order to keep Americans safe from upcoming biological threats.

However, some risks are worth being taken if that means a cure to cancer or other deadly diseases. Not all genetic engineering is bad, such as the discovery of genetically modifying cells to cure HIV. Scientist at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University have changed the cells into extremely vigorous weapons that will destroy cells infected with HIV (Forum on Safe Sex). These cells are able to be modified for the better just like the creature’s cells were modified the make him

At this moment, tens of millions of animals, such as rats, rabbits, monkeys, cats, and dogs, plus more, are being locked inside cages in labs all throughout the country due to being used in horrific experiments. These animal experiments are used to develop and enhance new drugs and to test the safety of products before being used on humans. Many of these experiments inflict pain to the animals and decrease their satisfactory of life. More than a hundred million animals suffer and die every year in the U.S. from medical education and clinical experiments, as well as merciless chemical, drug, food, and cosmetic tests. Animals also suffer and die in classroom biology experiments and dissection.

The incident being studied in this report occurred in early June of 2014. Two Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) labs were found to be guilty of mishandling biohazardous material, and negligent to following proper safety regulations surrounding the handling of biohazardous material. The result of this was more than 80 employees were exposed to live anthrax pathogens, putting their lives in potential danger. In addition, two strains of flu were accidentally cross contaminated and shipped to another lab, risking the lives of those at the lab who handled it. The U.S. Department of Agriculture conducted the investigations and work was seized immediately in both labs. The specifics surrounding the incident included dangerous

Did you know that animals that are found in laboratories are not all legally protected? There are a couple organizations provided by Legal Animal Defense Fund that protect animals from being illegally used, such as Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) and mandatory Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC). AAALAC is an organization that promotes the humane treatments of animals used in experiments. On their website they explain that animal research is known as controversial topic. “But like others in the animal welfare

Do not (for one moment) believe that genetic experimentation will end here. Truth be known – the next horrifying steps have already been taken under carefully guarded, clandestine laboratory

As time goes on, progress is inevitable. Technology improves, and subsequently, as does quality of life. In the past century, the human race has made countless advances in medicine, many of which significantly prolong our life spans. Some of these advances may have even been challenged in their time, but the results have benefitted us for generations, and those to come. Nowadays, we couldn’t imagine a life without vaccinations, surgeries, and even targeted cancer therapies. Where we go from here is up to us. In human germ-line engineering lays the opportunity to end much of the worlds suffering. The United States should not prohibit human germ-line engineering, but instead allow it under strict regulations and close supervision to maintain optimal safety for future generations and the future of humanity.

For all the global oversight against bioweapons, this threat remains especially pernicious. A unique aspect of bioterror is that it can be difficult to tell the difference between naturally occurring disease and accidents, and an intentional attack. For this reason, a biological attack would require a huge level of coordination among federal, state and local public health and security officials. In addition, bioweapons do not have to be naturally occurring – toxins and deadly organisms can be produced in a lab. Growing large amounts of an agent is possible, although equipment, space, safety, and technical knowledge all play a role. The threat is that creating a bioweapon often requires techniques that are already published in scientific literature. Additionally, the equipment required is somewhat easily obtained, since it is required for legitimate research. This creates a perplexing “dual-use” problem, wherein it is hard to create restrictions against bioweapons without inhibiting industry.

scientist genetic material that could be used for the advancement and the betterment of life, but from the other side this new knowledge can also be used by terrorist to produce pathogens that can be used as biological weapons as it had been used by the terrorist groups. yet, there is no way to foretell if terrorist will have the ability to take hold of weapons of destruction in the future. Since 9/11 WMD proliferation become the core concern which drive the united states policy, both on the diplomatic level, or the security level, especially after the use of the

Holohan , T., M.D. (n.d.). The National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB): Enhancing Oversight of Dual Use Research. Retrieved October 30, 2017, from https://2001-2009.state.gov/t/isn/bw/50010.htm