System Engineering : A Complex Engineering Problem

1. System Thinking: System thinking is nothing but instead of focusing on only one particular issue, we have to analyze and try to understand the entire system on the whole. With this kind of analyzation, we can easily find a solution to the problem as the problems are not confined to only a particular area or time. We might find a solution for a particular issue, somewhere in the whole system by analyzing the entire system completely. We should try to relate the actions and the consequences on the whole as the issues occur at different time levels, not confined to only one particular time level. We have to have knowledge of the relation between different departments of an organization and the relation between them and the functionality between the departments as to how they are related in an organization. We generally focus on only one particular issue rather than seeing the bug picture and that shouldn’t be done. In system thinking we analyze the big picture.

System nature: The system requirements and functioning can be a very simple task or a complex one. Training level and duration can be brief with a pre-defined step-by-step procedure to solve a limited problem. Because in this case the most of the task is performed by the system and user has limited thinking and evaluation requirement. On the other hand, if the user is supposed to analyze the given task and problem, define a procedure or routine to solve it then the detail and long term training is required.

This research investigated systems thinking and the use of soft systems methodology to develop a conceptual model of systems change based on strategies in established systems care. Soft in SSM stresses human systems as not fixed entities and the process of thinking as systemic. As a result, change is looked at differently with one focused on evolving systems instead of linear steps or mechanical parts. The conceptual model of this paper presents key components of the system change process in care systems and clarifies the relationship in those components.

A system is an organized structure that has inputs and outputs that carry out a specific activity. A system is a group of components that makes up a complex functioning unit. When an element changes, the system will stop functioning right. Once the system has been defined by jurisdiction, budget, coverage requirements and user needs, the next step is to design the system using components and systems that are obtainable and have the desired features that the customer and the design engineer have agreed upon. If the design engineer is not careful, then there will be coverage, operational, maintenance and reliability issues that will plague the system forever. The equipment-engineering phase will specify each and every component in the system, (Wiesenfeld, 2010). Due to a problem or situation, there is a beginning and an end to a system that is tasked to solve that problem.

Systems analysis is when business hire individuals to analyse their systems to determine what issues are present with their current systems and provide a solution that will fix the issues.

After reviewing Figure 1 & 2, I recommend the practice purchase System B. Both System A & B offer many of the same key attributes needed of a computer-based patient record system identified by the Institute of Medicine in 1991. However, one main reasoning for choosing System B over A is that System A does not have the capacity to offer tailored views. The benefit of an EMR/EHR system that can offer tailored views, goes beyond meeting functionality needs and is a benefit that can greatly aid in the successful user integration of the computerized order entry function (CPOE) of the system. Recent studies show there is great value in having an EMR/EHR system that is specifically designed to meet the practice’s needs or offers tailored views to reduce user fatigue and support the proper use of the system (Russ, Zillich, McManus, Doebbelingb & Saleem, 2012). Tailored views improve the user’s experience with the technology, make it easier

In this self-starting world, system analysis and design are generally connected with the actions of software development. Systems analysis and systems design are normally theorized as the two main components of a system development. System analysis is the course of exploring a system, detecting problems, supporting the details of a present or planed system, which uses the information to encourage advancements to the system. in the organization which I am employed, there are numerous

Systems theory: a scientific/philosophical approach and set of concepts, rather than a theory, for the transdisciplinary study of complex phenomena. It was first proposed by the biologist Ludwig von Bertalanffy in the 1940's (anthology: "General Systems Theory", 1968), as a reaction against scientific reductionism*. Rather than reducing a phenomenon (say, the human body) to a collection of elements or parts (say, the organs or cells), systems theory focuses on the relations and interactions between the parts, which connect them into a whole (see holism*). The particular arrangement of

System Analysis is the study where detailed information about the components and requirements of a system, the information needs of an organisation, the characteristics and current components of the systems and the user functional requirements of the systems that is proposed system.

The current environment, for Riordan 's departments, is requiring increased labor in order to process information. The slow consolidation of the operational processes of two divisions with different operation software has become a financial threat to Riordan Manufacturing. Each of the divisions lacks modern technology that is needed to run a highly efficient corporation. Therefore, there is not enough information being shared between customers, sales, finance, manufacturing, and management. The upgrades will make their performance consistent with more rapidly and more efficient company locations; corporate headquarters,

It is evident that the practices of modeling, simulation and prototyping produce optimal results and saves a lot of resources and time however, these practices should not be overused to produce results. They can sometimes produce results related to incorrectly defined problem and overconfidence on these results can be catastrophic. It is necessary to properly understand the boundaries of a defined system and or a problem statement that will permit the use of the techniques, as well as limitation of the accuracy that such techniques provide. While practicing this technique in systems architecting, it should be realized that an assumption that “original statement of the problem is the best”[6] might prove wrong. “It might not necessary be the best or even the right one”[6]. Also overuse of these techniques might prove costly and a time-consuming investment to extent that it is not present in the systems architecting process. It is important that all the necessary factors are appropriately accounted for and avoid the pitfalls in the system.

Here I want to discuss what is System analysis and design, when and where the concepts are used and how to overcome the problems using these concepts. The methodology of using characterizing the parts, structural engineering, interfaces and information for a framework to fulfil the decided necessities is said as system design. This course is helpful in developing the designing and analysing skills. Overall, system analysis and design is said as analysing and designing the different process.

System development can generally be thought of having two major components: systems analysis and systems design. In System Analysis more emphasis is given to understanding the details of an existing system or a proposed one and then deciding whether the proposed system is desirable or not and whether the existing system needs improvements. Thus, system analysis is the process of investigating a system, identifying problems, and using the information to recommend improvements to the system. System design is the process of planning a new business system or one to replace or complement an existing system.

Systems analysis refers to a problem solving technique where a business or procedure is studied and the goals are identified in order to create information systems to help the business achieve their goal more efficiently and easier. Systems analysts obtain feedback from the system users in various ways e.g. interviews, questionnaires etc. More importantly they find out from the users what their specific requirements are regarding the proposed system and then use the information obtained to formulate requirements for the system, the system is then written ensuring that all the requirements and expectations are met.

Though many people interchange system engineering models and software engineering life cycle models, they are defined as two different approaches to software development. System engineering is the technical and technical management process that results in delivered products and systems that exhibit the best balance of cost and performance. As the program progresses from one phase to the next one, so does the system engineering process. It deals with the overall management of engineering project during their life cycle. Its main focus is knowing what the clients and end users wants and needs are satisfied and developing just that all the way through the system’s entire life cycle. Whereas, on the other hand, software engineering focuses on the quality of the product or system, how cost effective it is, is it done within the time-constraints given, whether it is easy to maintain and enhance, and does it work as the requirements defined. Its main focus is on delivering a product that meets the requirement specifications. There are so many models to choose from, as it all depends on what the project needs and entails. Depending on the requirements, allows for the choice of what mode to use.