preview

Systematic Style Review Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document

The 10 studies that are included in this systematic-style review consist of 8 case-control and 2 cohort studies, all of which are retrospective. High methodological quality score (9 points or more) was given to 3 out of the 10 studies. Table 1 illustrates in greater detail the characteristics of each study as well as the Newcastle-Ottawa score allocated to each paper. From the 10 studies assessed, only 5 were rated highly in relation to patient selection. The most common reason for this was that the majority of studies were lacking for independent validation for patient selection, since the data was extracted using the international classification of disease codes. The majority of the studies scored the maximum points for comparability of …show more content…

However, given that the purpose of this systematic-style review is to identify whether there is any difference between women who have undergone BS and BMI-matched controls and/or between the same women before and after BS, part of the data discussed in some of the studies was not used for data extraction and analysis. More specifically, the study by Patel et al., (2008) includes data on 3 control groups, including non-obese women, obese and severely obese. However, for the purpose of this review data from the non-obese women was omitted. Similarly, the paper by Santulli et al., (2010) also includes data for 120 women with no BS and normal BMI, information which was not included in this analysis. Finally, Amsalem et al., (2013) compared 109 deliveries of women before BS with 218 deliveries of the same women after BS (control group A: 109 first deliveries following BS and control group B: 109 second deliveries). However, in the present review and meta-analysis, only data from group A was used as the aim is to compare the effect of BS on maternal and neonatal outcomes and not the effect of 2 consecutive pregnancies following BS for these

Get Access