Toronto Anti-Violence Intervention Strategy (TAVIS)
Policing SSCI-3050U-001
Andrew Lee
Kyle McCaughey
100429290
Program Description
Public safety and the safety of communities are one of the most important areas of focus for the police, which is why I chose to do my policing paper on the crime prevention program known as TAVIS. TAVIS stands for Toronto Anti-Violence Intervention Strategy and was created on January 5th, 2006 which included 3 new rapid response teams with 18 officers on each team. The idea was that the teams could be released instantly if any gang or gun violence was reported. A total of an additional 72 officers were formed into these teams and are strategically placed throughout
…show more content…
The community I’ll be looking at is the Mount Olive—Silverstone-Jamestown neighbourhood. The TAVIS team was in the Jamestown area in 2010 and the result of the team being there was compared to the amount of crime that occurred the year before. Also I’ll compare the statistics of when they were there to the follow year to see how their presence affected the community. In 2011, the year after the TAVIS team had left the Jamestown region drug charges were up from 44 to a total of 90, robberies grew to 78 from the previous 54 and sexual assaults were up from 44 to 75.3 As you can see strictly from those stats, the presence of the TAVIS team being there was successful in a sense in those 3 major categories of crime as the following year they all rose in numbers drastically. When comparing some minor crime activity stats from 2009 to 2010 there was a 6.9% drop in assaults, 36.9% drop in break and enters, and an 18.4% drop in vehicle theft.4 Those stats seem to show that the TAVIS presence was making instant changes to the amount of criminal activity. As you can see by all the stats, they all seem to say the same thing. When the police were in the neighbourhood of Jamestown crime took a hit and was on the decline, when the police left the area the criminal activity sky rocketed back up and went past when they used to be before the TAVIS team got there. So it seems pretty simple, keep the police there and the crime goes
After watching the documentary on Policing the Police provided by Frontline, I have come to realize that community policing rather and the use of a task force is a better approach when trying to get guns and drugs off the street. Subsequently, I do not believe that officers can realistically get guns and drugs off the streets without violating citizens’ rights. Based on related articles from The New Yorker and PBS, and first hand experiences from the narrator in the documentary I will be able to provide insight into my own opinions and thoughts about the issues at hand. This essay will also provide insight into the pros and cons of using community policing rather than using a task force. Also, this essay will touch on the
The Smithville city council assumes that crime persists because the city’s police force has too low a profile, but the memo never cites evidence to support this position. The council could do something as simple yet effective as asking the town librarian to review published studies to see whether a parallel exists between a high police presence and reduced crime rates. It could also hire an independent research
The Philadelphia foot patrol experiment: a randomized controlled trial of police patrol effectiveness in violent crime hotspots is an experiment that had over 200 foot patrol officers during the summer of 2009, in the Philadelphia area (Ratcliffe, 2011). This research covered 60 violent crime hotspots in twelve weeks (Ratcliffe, 2001). There was a noticeable reduction in the violent crimes within those area hotspots. Furthermore, 53% of violent crimes were prevented during the twelve weeks of the experiment (Ratcliffe, 2011). In conjunction the type of patrol that was utilized, was foot patrol in the hotspot areas, which was the independent variable. The dependent variable was the reduction
Community Policing took a different perspective on crime than August Vollmer. It shows that even though police officers are trained and respond to crimes on time, it doesn’t effect the crime rates. In the past foot-patrol was in place but it quickly failed due to poor management and not enough funds for the program (Bohm & Haley, 2014, Pg. 147). Community Policing was an idea to form a bond between the police and the citizens. If the police paid more attention to the minor problems in
Community policing has evolved to be the most used strategy for policing. “It is an approach to crime detection and prevention that provides police officers and supervisors with new tools for addressing recurrent problems that plague communities and consume a majority of police agency time and resources” (Peak, 2012, 65). It has been defined by various people differently. But all the definitions have similar principles (Chappell, 2009). They focus on proactive problem solving and create relationships with the community to address any issue that may arise. Community policing is a combination of client-oriented and problem-oriented policing.
Buntin, J. (2017, July). In Extreme Community Policing, Cops Become the Neighbor. Retrieved October 15, 2017, from
S., & Forst, L. S. (2016). An introduction to policing (8th ed.). Boston, MA, USA: Cengage Learning.
Brantford, a city in Southwestern Ontario, had a population of 93,650 in 2011 and a population density of 1292.3 persons per square kilometers (City of Brantford, 2011). Because the area’s growth and population base met the provincial guidelines for a CMA designation, the Brantford area was nominated as a Census Metropolitan Area (CMA) in 2006 (Statistics Canada, 2013). City of Brantford was chosen to be the ideal site for this research for three reasons. Firstly, the police-reported violent crime severity index (PRCSI) had increased in Brantford even though there was a decline in volume and severity in the national average between 2012 and 2013 (Statistics Canada, 2013). The crime severity index in Brantford
Although many may find community policing and problem-oriented policing to fall in the same category, there is (surprisingly) a difference between the two. For one, community policing has many definitions. For some, it means instituting foot and bicycle patrols and doing acts pertaining to the ideal bond between police officers and their community. While for others it means maintaining order and cleaning up neighborhoods in desperate need of repair (Dunham & Alpert, 2005). However, an idyllic definition of community policing is altering the traditional definition of crime control to community problem-solving and promising to transform the way police do their job. Within the past two decades, there has been much research on community
Community Oriented Policing was born in the late 1960’s. Between the 1930’s and the 1960’s law enforcement used a professional policing model that was based on hierarchical structures, efficient response times, standardization, and the
Due to these apparent successes, the problem-focused approach has been used to address a diverse array of problems such as gangs, drugs, school crime and the management of police call for service in urban, suburban and even rural communities. The exploration of possible responses to a problem is handled by police officers. Once a problem is identified, officers are expected to work closely with the community members to develop a solution, which can include a wide range of alternatives to arrest. These may focus on the offender, the community, the environment, outside agencies, or the need for some kind of mediation. Problem-oriented policing grew out of twenty years of research into police practices, and differs from traditional policing strategies in many significant ways. For example, problem-oriented policing enables police agencies to be more effective. Currently, police agencies commit most of their time to responding to calls for service. Problem-oriented policing offers a more effective strategy by addressing the
Policing is a very difficult, complex and dynamic field of endeavor that is always evolves as hard lessons teach us what we need to know about what works and what don’t work. There are three different Era’s in America’s policing: The Political Era, The Reform Era, and The Community Problem Solving Era. A lot has changed in the way that policing works over the years in the United States.
Gaines, L. K., & Kappeler, V. E. (2014). Policing in america (8th ed.). (S. Decker-Lucke, Ed.) Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America: Anderson Publishing. Retrieved January 2017
Policing is a huge contributor to maintaining peace and order in Canada. Without it, there would be huge amounts of violence and chaos in society. Different types of policing has been created and tested such as; reactive, preventive, and proactive policing. Proactive policing has proven to be the most effective type of policing in preventing and deterring crime. “Proactive policing is the practice of deterring criminal activity by showing police presence and engaging the public to learn their concerns, thereby preventing crime from taking place in the first place”(Proactive policing, 2016). This method is better than the other two is because proactive connects with the community and analyze problems instead of random patrols. Although there are many types of proactive policing, the two most effective are; problem oriented and community policing.
In this weekly report, I had experienced my time going on a ride-along with the community policing unit. This week is different because I worked 12 and a half hour shifts throughout a course of three days. In the community policing unit, it had two officers running the unit, officer Zubko and sergeant Swanger. I mainly worked with officer Zubko because he is proactive in community policing to the extent that the department allows him to work with. The jurisdiction that these officers could only work in are the apartment complexes in the west and south side of Lorain that are typically low-income homes and have high volume of crime in the area. The functions that I observed of community policing is primarily engaging the public in conversation and speaking to children with the attempt of making a small difference in their lives. Officer Zubko and I would spend time walking on patrol to speak to children and talk to them more than adults. On the instances that we would engage in conversation with adults, some disrespected the representation of the police department and did not want to speak to us using vulgar language to stay away from them. Others would appreciate the time an officer is checking on their welfare and know when to approach the police for any help necessary. Another function performed was Officer Zubko and I often scanned license plates throughout the areas of the apartment complexes to track down the drug trade that is brought into the apartments along with any other crimes that will decrease the violence in the complexes. The primary apartment complex that had the most issue was west view apartment complex on the west side of Lorain. In the complex, we received most calls of domestic violence, thefts, and crimes committed outside of the apartment homes such as the robbery event at the gas station. The environment of policing seemed it took a long process to go through an investigation, but met every target of what needed to be completed. In addition, I learned multiple variations of filing a report through the computer in a squad car to get a better understand of the process officers take to complete their investigation.