TJR Case Study

This model reimburses hospitals based on quality of care instead of the volume of patients. The quality of care is assessed by patient questionnaires and if hospitals are unsatisfactory penalties may be imposed (Edwoldt, 2012). The value-based system also affects Medicare and Medicaid. It was reported that Medicare readmissions within 30 days of discharge cost 17 billion dollars annually (Edwoldt, 2012). Due to the high costs of readmissions Medicare and Medicaid have implemented a Hospital Readmission Reduction program. A formula is utilized to evaluate readmission rates within 30 days of discharge for any medical reason related to their original admission such as heart failure and pneumonia. Upon review the hospital is potentially penalized. It is important that nurses strive to provide excellence in care despite their beliefs on the ACA. Nurses have the ability to provide a safe patient environment and reduce the risk of hospital associated infections by following hospital protocols such as hand washing.

Hospital readmissions are potentially harmful, costly and often times an avoidable event. Between the provisions set forth under the Affordable Care Act and the penalties authorized by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services, hospitals are forced to shift their focus towards the development of strategies to reduce and prevent avoidable hospital readmissions related to heart failure. It is estimated that of the 6 million individuals within the United States diagnosed with heart failure, 1 million of them are hospitalized each year with a primary diagnosis of heart failure, accounting for $17 billion dollars of Medicare expenditures (Sales et al, 2013). What is worse is the death rate associated with heart failure each year, accounting

The Affordable Care Act was enacted to improve health care and to lower health care cost in America. The ACA developed different strategies to meet these goals called the “pay for performance” programs. These strategies are aimed at the different providers to improve quality care. The strategy that I selected is the “Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program” this program/strategy is also known as the HRRP and was begun in October of 2012. HRRP is aimed at hospitals and penalizes hospitals that have a high 30 day readmission rate. The penalties are assessed and based on a number of comparisons, those such as, performance, patient demographics, comorbidities and frailty.

The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) was passed in 2012 under the Affordable Care Act, to help hospitals to improve patient care and reduce costs. (Danner, 2016). The diagnoses with the highest readmissions rates associated with the highest expense are: acute myocardial infarction (AMI), pneumonia, and congestive heart failure. CMS also extended their program in 2015 to incorporate reimbursement reduction for hip/knee replacements, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and they also have plans in 2017 to include the

The aim of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is to reduce hospital readmission and to increase implementation of transitional care coordination for low health care cost. One benefit of establishing this

In addition, it also measures the quality of care and patient satisfaction. In 2015, the US Secretary of HHS has announced a goal of 85 percentages of Medicare Fee for Service payments tied to quality or value. In addition, many new payment models are associated with HRRP; for instance, forthcoming Skilled Nursing Facility VBP program and Dialysis Adequacy measure , potentially specifies preventable readmission measures. As the system is moving from quantity to quality, it is beneficial to implement quality of standards to optimize future benefits for the community and Central Health as well. Currently, Central Health has higher readmission rate than national average with an overall rating of 2 out of 5. Penalties incurred due to below standard of care could strain hospital resources to utilize for the betterment of our facility. Furthermore, the incentive structure has concerned Central Health to reevaluate the mode of practice and care provided engaging healthcare providers and patients. Central Health is committed to reducing readmission rates by identifying and sharing best practices for long term benefits. Given the flexibility of penalty under the 21st Cure Act, the initial program will focus on readmission prevention within 30 days of hospital

Hospitals nationwide have been striving to reduce the rate of patient readmissions. Both the federal government and private insurers are tired of picking up the tab. In a 2009 study in the New England Journal of Medicine, researchers estimated that a year's worth of unplanned re-hospitalizations cost Medicare alone $17.4 billion. Congestive heart failure is a particularly big target, as one in four patients end up back in the hospital within 30 days of discharge. Starting in the fall of 2012, the government will cut Medicare reimbursements for hospitals with higher-than-expected 30-day readmission rates for heart failure and two other conditions: heart attack and pneumonia (Avril, 2011).

There is a problem of avoidable hospital readmission rates for the Medicare and Medicaid populations that lead to adverse consequences not only for the patient, but also the payer and hospital. In order to decrease these avoidable readmission rates it is important to identify processes that can be implemented at the health plan level such as pre-discharge hospital visits by health plan staff, and post-discharge care coordination.

Congestive heart failure is a growing chronic condition in the United States that accounts for over one million hospitalizations and is responsible for 27% of patients with heart failure on Medicare are readmitted with 30 days of discharge (Hines, Yu & Randall, 2010). The intensity of the disease process poses a financial strain on both the patient and the payers, especially Medicare, as 10 per 1000 population are 65 years or older and therefore a Medicare beneficiary (Mozaffarian et al., 2015). Consequently, in order to gain control over this chronic disease and its cost burden, the government and policy makers have shifted the responsibility to the health care facilities through the creation of policies that affect hospital reimbursement based on readmission rates. As a member of the quality team at my facility, the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program deeply impacts my practice and encourages the hospital as a whole to focus on improving multidisciplinary collaboration in pursuit of quality patient care, resulting in better outcomes and decreased readmissions.

The goal of the initiative is to increase efficiency of care, improve quality of care, and lower costs. This initiative consists of four different bundled payment models. The first three bundled payment models are retrospective payment arrangements based on patients’ historical data. However, the fourth model is proposed for the future. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) make a single bundled payment to the hospital for all services during inpatient stays for hospitals, physicians, and other medical professional specialists.

Policy makers created the Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) in an attempt to improve quality of patient care and lower costs (James, 2013). In order to avoid these penalties, healthcare leaders must recognize that CMS has identified a correlation between readmissions and a lack of quality care. Therefore, the aim is not to focus solely on hospital readmissions, but to seek clinical excellence by investing in quality improvement (Silow-Carrol, Edwards & Lashbrook, 2011). However, reducing readmissions is a complex undertaking, because not all readmissions can or should be prevented. Indeed, some readmissions are planned as part of sound clinical care. Furthermore, while hospitals work to reduce readmissions caused

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was created to improve the efficiency of how health organizations will improve patient outcomes and accountability, aid in coordination of that care; improve and promote effective health management across organizations, as well as align incentives with good patient outcomes. It was designed to use electronic health records with in and across health organizations in order to improve the outcomes of medical care. In order to do this correctly, health and medical organizations must “meaningfully” use the programs that are available in order to receive any incentives given by Medicaid and Medicare.

It has been reported that over $25-45 billion was spent in the year 2011 on avoidable complications and “unnecessary hospital readmissions” (Burton, 2012). Poor healthcare transition has been the route of the cause for poor healthcare quality and waste. Once patients are discharged from

Medicare has changed the way it pays hospitals for services delivered to clients with Medicare. Instead of only paying for the amount of services the hospital offers, Medicare also pays hospitals for providing top quality health care services. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), a federal agency that runs the Medicare program, is altering the way Medicare compensates for hospital care by giving rewards to those hospitals that delivers higher quality and higher value service to clients (Medicare.gov, n.d.). At the beginning of October 1, 2012, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) permits Medicare by reducing payments to acute care hospitals with surplus readmissions that are paid under CMS 's inpatient potential payment system (Medicare.gov, n.d.). Medicare has information regarding how the hospital 's quality care affects the disbursements it receives from Medicare. The Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program, created by the ACA,

In an effort to curb these costs, in 2013 the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) enacted the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. Under this program, hospitals are penalized for readmissions occurring in the first 30 days. The penalties apply to specific conditions for CMS recipients including acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, coronary artery bypass graft