preview

Taken Conventions

Good Essays
Open Document

Taken (Pierre Morel, 2008), as a film considered to be under the action genre, incorporates elements into the plot that are considered to be defining traits of action films. However, the film also uses certain elements in various ways, so that Taken is also not a typical “action” film in many ways. Overall, Taken is largely a “progressive” action film, which deviates from many generic conventions in typical action films. However, different aspects of the film can be considered either “status quo” or “progressive”, depending on the characteristics that are analyzed and considered. For the purposes of this paper, three specific dimensions will be considered in how Taken fits into, or diverges from, the action genre: characterization of race/ethnicity, …show more content…

The most notable example can be the lack of spectacle/big action scenes in the film, which is often a defining generic convention . When action is used, it is relatively subdued, such as in the climax of the film, which only involves some physical fighting and gunfire, and not explosions and such that would be part of typical action movies. Another example would be when Bryan tracks down the man that kidnapped Kim, and instead of a big “spectacle” fight, he only engages in moderate physical violence to restrain the man (a fist fight), and when that does not work a relatively low-tech car chase ensues. However, Bryan does not hesitate to use violence when necessary, such as in the previously mentioned final gun fight scene, or when escaping from the Albanian mobsters. In this way, the film recognizes the conventions of an action film, but limits this action to when it is absolutely necessary (not violence for the sake of violence scenes). Compared to normal action films, this film is “progressive” throughout, such as in scenes mentioned above, and does not overly engage in classic action film conventions of spectacle. Instead, the film takes a more methodical and low-key approach, only using a degree of spectacle fighting when absolutely necessary. Ultimately, while the film makes recognition …show more content…

Instead, his character prefers to think through steps in a logical manner to solve problems. A good example is when he arrives in Paris, and instead of frantically looking through the apartment where his daughter was kidnapped, he slowly and methodically retraces what must have happened when she was taken (through mental flashback images, with action), similar to examining a crime scene. This scene could then be interpreted as recognizing that violence is there in the film, but elsewhere, while Bryan takes an calm, thoughtful approach in line with his character. Another example would be when Bryan is on the phone with Kim before she was about to be taken hostage. While the scene was frantic on her end of the conversation, Bryan did not panic, and actually told Kim that she would be taken. Again, while most action films would most likely have the main character panicking and rushing to action, Bryan seems to thoughtfully think out each step, and does not lose his cool. This is a good example of how the character of Bryan, and the film more generally, do not engage in spectacle for the sake of it, but take a collected approach toward events that could potentially lead to

Get Access