Taking a Look at Proposition 103 in California

HOUSTON GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY; Inez Grant; Morehouse Parish School Board; Horace Mann Insurance Company and Lloyd Gray, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees.

The legislative framework of a country refers to the process of creating, utilization, and governing of laws. In the United States, the government of each of the 50 states is structured in accordance with their respective constitution and although not required, each are modeled after the federal government, consisting of the three branches: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. Each of the state governments are also organized as a presidential system where the governor is the head of the state. Due to each state having their own governor as their representative, their legislative framework will vary with each state. For this paper, I will be comparing the legislative framework of Florida with the state of California.

The Mckinney act of 1987 now known as the Mckinney-Vento Homeless Act is a United state-federal legislate law that provide that fund the homeless shelter program. It is the only main federal government geared toward homeless. The Act started in 1986 as the Homeless Persons’ Survival Act. It started as pressure on the federal government to address homelessness as a national problem requiring nation response.The act was signed into law by President Ronald Reagan on July 22 1987. The McKinney-Vento Act originally consisted of fifteen programs providing a range of services to homeless people, including emergency shelter, transitional housing, job training, primary health care, education, and some

California is known for Hollywood and its wonderful climate, where people meet celebraties and they can wear shorts in the middle of winter, but California is also know to be one of the few states that allow its citizens to vote for laws. Numerous laws are passed by Californians every year, some those laws deal with whether California should raise taxes or where the state need to spend their money and other matters that deal with California political system. Over the years, numerous laws that have been passed by Californians which have been conterversial and one of those laws is Propotion 13 of 1978.

Privacy, as defined by the American Heritage Dictionary, is the quality or condition of being secluded from the presence or view of others, and the state of being free from public attention or unsanctioned intrusion. Interestingly, the Constitution of the United States does not expressly protect a person 's right to privacy; there are however some provisions to privacy within the Bill of Right and the Amendments to the Constitution. Among them are the first amendment, that ensures the privacy or belief, the third amendment, that ensures the privacy of home, and the fourth amendment, that ensures the privacy of person and possession.

The Mental Health Services Act is a monumental proposition that has helped many people for more than a decade. In California alone, close to 1.2 million adults and around 422,000 children live with a serious mental illness (State 2010). Without the proper treatment, suicide is the leading cause of death for a person battling an untreated mental illness (State 2010). With over thirteen billion dollars raised so far, MHSA has been the root of funding for mental health in California (Williams 2015). MHSA is still a work in progress. The act is nowhere near perfect, as a recent audit has shown, but it is certainly a step in the right direction.

What historical problems/issues/concerns, as perceived by the policy initiators and/or sponsors of the legislation, including the governor led to the creation of the bill? In other words, what was the nature of the problems that the bill corrected? According to the initiators/sponsors how important is this piece of legislation to the citizens of the state.

Next, do some more research for news articles related to Proposition 47. Use APA format to identify and summarize two additional articles on the topic.

California's Proposition 13 had a big impact on American government and public policy because it put to vote the reduction of property taxes. This Proposition had a great impact as it swept the county and made headlines in newspapers around the world. People used this initiative process to gain a greater control over their lives. The California taxpayers stood up and said no more to excessive taxes because they were tired of out of control property taxes and losing their homes because they could not pay property taxes while the government did nothing to help them. This in turn hurt the schools, cities, counties and special districts. From this proposition, we have a few others like

As a Canadian in today’s society we believe we have a certain set of inalienable rights. One of those rights that seem to be at the forefront of the 2015 Canadian election is privacy. As Dr. Kent Roach and Dr. Craig Forcese state, “privacy is, in our society, the right to be left alone by the state.” The Conservative upbringing of Bill C-51 challenges the ideology around our right to be private, as well as our government’s role in the protection of Canada from threats of terrorism. The Harper government essentially, will increase their role in national security to keep a constant watchful eye on potentially harmful situations and end them before anyone is hurt or killed. If passed, the bill would allow the government to arrest anyone suspected of terrorism without that person even committing a crime. Furthermore, the language used in the bill is extremely vague and makes one question, where the line will be drawn? Will our basic rights to peaceful protest and free speech be affected? Unfortunately perhaps they will. One of the most concerning parts of the bill in regard to privacy is the fact that the government will now be able to access several sensitive documents about citizens from top agencies such as the Public Health Agency, Canadian Border Services Agency as well as the Canadian Border Services Agency. Privacy is changing in Canada. This is a landmark bill and as such it is creating quite a splash in the ongoing Canadian Election.

The state of California was admitted into the Union in 1850 and has since grown into one of the largest economies in the world. Today, California is one of the most popular states in the union, attracting thousands of tourists every year. The California state constitution is one of the oldest state constitutions that is still in use. California has two constitutions: one ratified prior to their admittance into the union on November 13, 1849 and the current constitution, ratified on May 7, 1879 (Georgetown Law). Since its ratification, the document has been amended over 500 times. Compared to the federal government, the California constitution is also a representative democracy, electing governors, representatives, and senators to interpret and pass laws. Through the numerous amendments and the structure of government, California has proved to be a democratic institution. In this report, I will argue that the California Constitution is too democratic among its citizens. This does/doesn’t lead to ________.

Closing out the meeting was John Connolly who serves as Associate Director of Insure the Uninsured. Connolly detailed the Covered California healthcare exchange as a commercial insurance provider. Connolly spent the majority of his time speaking addressing the improvements to coverage, and eligibility changes to applicable California residents. Making a repeated and substantial effort to state how the commercial insurance exchange would work, Connolly showed the various healthcare providers that would be available to certain individuals, and an estimation of the average cost per provider. The most significant aspect of Connolly’s presentation was his outline of the new health insurance plan tier levels, ranging from “Bronze” to “Platinum”. Bronze tier coverage represented the tier with the smallest amount of payment made by the plan and highest amount of payment made by the consumer, and Platinum tier coverage representing the highest amount of payment made by the plan and lowest amount paid by consumer.

10, October. "No on Proposition 35." Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times, 10 Oct. 2012. Web. 03 Apr.

In 2006 the state of Massachusetts wanted to help its millions of citizens who were uninsured. The state legislators as well as the governor put into place a plan to help citizens get insurance. A law was passed to reform insurance in Massachusetts, which was known as Chapter 58 of the Acts of 2006 of the Massachusetts General Court; its long form title is An Act Providing Access to Affordable, Quality, Accountable Health Care.

In Massachutettes, health plans wanted to eliminate “continuous open enrollment, assess the full annual penalty for any significant period of continuous un-insurance, impose waiting periods for certain services and bar consumers from buying in the merged market if they had access to employer sponsored coverage” (case study). Doing these things, the insurance companies hoped to lower premiums. Bill 2585 did pass but the law did not go as far as the insurance companies had hoped. It only “limited open enrollment in the merged market to twice a year in 2011 and once a year after that” (case study), which didn’t really help much. Due to loss in the small market group in 2009, health plans “planned double digit premium increases in 2010” (case study), but the government stepped in and put a stop to it. Even though the big name hospitals were driving up cost, the insurance companies were seen as the bad guys. This caused local plans to “record sizable operating losses for the first quarter of 2010 and had to draw on reserves to cover expected losses resulting from the rate rollbacks” (case study). The insurance companies, especially the smaller ones, suffered financially.