Tale Of Two Cities Inhumanity Analysis

The triumph of love, the death of Madame Defarege, and the triumph of Charles Darnay in trial shows how good triumphed over evil. The theme of

The French Revolution was a movement from 1789 to 1799 that brought an end to the monarchy, including many lives. Although A Tale of Two Cities was published in 1859, it was set before and during the French Revolution and had over 200 million copies sold. The author, Charles Dickens, is known for being an excellent writer and displays several themes in his writings. Sacrifice is an offering of an animal or human life or material possession to another person. Dickens develops the theme of sacrifice throughout the story by the events that occurred involving Dr. Manette, Mr. Defarge, and Sydney Carton.

Justice is one of the main theme from this book, as each character tries to get justice. In this book we see the distress and agony that Madame Defarge suffers with. Mainly because of her sister’s deaths and family suffering, due to the Evremonde brother’s, Charles Darnay’s father and uncle. Ever since that happened she’s wanted justice for her and her family. The justice that Madame Defarge wanted later turn into retribution, which lead her to a path of darkness, making her wanting the death of Charles Darnay and his family. At the same time, she was fighting for justice for France, which made her want more lives to be dead for the good of her people. those dead are my dead, and that summons to answer for those things descends to me!’… “Then tell Wind and Fire where to stop,” … “but don’t tell me.” (Dickens 339) Many readers might portray her as the “villain” of this book, but she really is not. All she wanted is justice for what was done

The literature that came out of the French Revolution often shares common themes of death, rebirth, and destruction. Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens is much the same way. Throughout the novel, Dickens clearly supports the revolution but also depicts the brutality of the revolutionaries. Dickens uses powerful metaphors of a sea to symbolize the revolutionaries destroying old France and the belittling name of “Jacques” to depict the narcissistic views of the French aristocracy to show his support for the revolution.

Through the use of strong imagery of the descriptions of the seven prisoners and guards, Dickens emphasizes the shift in power among the French aristocracy and the commoners. As Madame Defarge leads the mob to seize the guards in Bastille and free the prisoners, the ironic contrast formed within the actions truly depict the power altering between the two distinctive social classes. The seven dead guards were portrayed as, “seven gory heads on pikes” and “impassive faces, yet with a suspended—not an abolished—expression on them”(170). The powerful imagery thoroughly proves their defeat against the mob, since after the seven prisoners were released, the power became of the commoners. Thus, this is a substantial event to the start of the revolution,

This becomes the criticism which brought forth the revolution due to the disapproval of aristocracy. This system seem to be ineffective as Dickens portrays them only caring for themselves while brushing off anyone who come to them for help. The social and political turmoil is shown to be unjust due to the large gap between the poverty of majority and the lavish Monseigneur. While Marquis ran over a child he is more concern with his carriage rather than someone child. He throws a bag of coin like nothing happened, a payment for the dead child. This type of mistreatment causes the pleasant to hate on the aristocracy and royalty leading towards

Charles Dickens focuses on the revenge that put the bloody French Revolution in motion in his suspenseful story A Tale of Two Cities. The French Revolution was a revolt instigated by the peasants, who attacked the nobles with vengeful hearts starting in the year 1789, and going on until the year 1799. The settings of the book took place in both London and England, two parallels in novel, two cities where the plotting of the Revolution went into affect. Although the reasons behind the different examples of revenge are exposed, the actions taken with revenge in mind are inexcusable and not justifiable. Dickens portrays the theme of revenge successfully through the joker Gaspard, the brave younger brother who sacrificed himself to protect his

A Tale of Two Cities, a book written by Charles Dickens in 1859, describes the situation of France and the French Revolution. At the end of Chapter Six, Dr. Manette, Lucie Manette, Charles Darnay, Sydney Carton, and Miss Pross are at a Tea Party. A turbulent storm occurs and incites an eerie mood within the characters. Charles Darnay starts telling a story about a paper he found. After telling the story, Dr. Manette begins to feel ill. Following this is a section which contains multiple literary elements. In Chapter Six, Dickens utilizes descriptive literary devices, such as imagery, personification, and anaphora, to foretell the French Revolution and set the mood of the passage.

Most of the upper class treats the lower class with no respect and with cruelty. Killing innocent people for no reason, brutal execution, and unreasonable imprisonment are a few things the upper class does. But, in the revolution, the third estate is doing the exact same thing. When the revolutionaries storm the Bastille, they beat the people from the first estate to death. Not only did they kill, but they chop off people’s heads and put them on pikes for everyone to see. This is the same brutality the first estate had. The third estate’s actions are not justified. Also, when the revolutionaries capture Old Foulon, his death sentence was hanging. The third estate hangs him three times, each time as painful as the next, until Old Foulon actually dies. Then, again, they sever his head from his body and put it on a pike. This savagery from the third estate is the same savagery from the first

There was not enough bread for them and money was useless even if you had it. Tons of people were dying which the film neglects to show. What really mattered was your reputation and ability to listen to the people, so the film portrays. Danton, a skilled listener, is seen in a more positive light from this. His ability to guide the people of France shows the directors favoritism. He would fight the mountain and go to trial rather than give rise to yet another civil war. His power is in his voice and is inevitably thrown in jail due to the law of suspects. The law, rather a decree, revokes one’s individual rights of freedom and extended into the revolutionary tribunal; the court system he had to face. It is there we see the power of the CPS and the backstabbing for political gains occurring. In eighteenth century France, this was common as the government was struggling to find it’s real leaders. Would Robespierre take control of this law and stab Danton? Or would he put an end to the terror which he and Danton started together with the beheading of King Louis

She witnesses firsthand all of the hardships the French commoners are enduring and it fuels her rage and anger toward the nobility. Madame Defarge channels all of this anger into exacting her revenge, but we cannot help pitying her for her wretched childhood. We comprehend the reasons behind the madness, but that does not justify her actions.

The violence in France will not stop until equality is reached. The revolutionaries picture a time when all the people of France live equal. This reasoning is the core factor of why they are fighting against the system. When we learned the motive for Madame Defarge’s reasoning for hating the Marquis and anyone associated with him, she replies that everyone against the revolution should “...tell the Wind and Fire where to stop; not me!” (326). We learn here that she has not intent to stop until she gets even with the Evrémonde family. Madame Defarge’s idea of equality is the death of Charles Darnay and everyone associated with him. When Madame Defarge and Defarge were discussing the end of the revolution Defarge asked the question, “but one must stop somewhere. After all, the question is still where?” (324). Defarge questions Madame Defarge’s intent to stop somewhere but Madame Defarge replies with “At extermination” (324). This strengthens the fact that Madame Defarge believes the revolution will be complete with the death

A Tale of Two Cities, written by Charles Dickens, takes place during the French Revolution. The book centers on the heroic attempts of Sydney Carton and Charles Darnay. Sydney Carton puts on the façade of being insolent and indifferent, but his true nature is expressed in the book when he puts others first, defends Charles, and dies for the ones he loves. Charles Darnay is a once wealthy aristocrat whose attempts at heroism include going back to France, his financial sacrifice, and the noble way in which he was willing to face his death.

He expected for the peasants to do their best because their best would make Prince de Conde rich, and Vatel, seeing Prince de Conde as an honorable man, would pay the peasants back. However, many of the peasants did not take well to the king, for many other peasants died while building his chateau in Versailles. For example, there was an instance in the film where a woman threw a rock at King Louis XIV, calling him a murderer. The guards carry her off and Prince de Conde orders for Vatel to see to the woman to be flogged, and Vatel quickly states that, “I’m not your master of flogging mad

The major conflict in the novel centers around the French Revolution itself and the characters involved. This would be described as external conflict (man vs. society). The French lower class suffered for a long time under the tight rulings and restraints of the French government and aristocracy. The lives of ignorant French aristocrats as described by the author is horrendous…"And who among the company at Monsignor's reception in that seventeen hundred and eightieth year of our Lord, could possibly doubt, that a system rooted in a frizzled hangman, powdered and gold-laced, pumped, and white-silk stockinet, would see the very stars out!" (105). The deaths of seemingly worthless peasant-like lower-class citizens had no affect what so ever upon the wealthy. This created a strong and continual