Tattoos The Ultimate In Expression Analysis

Vigeland writes, “a study conducted by careerbuilder.com found that thirty-seven percent of HR managers cite tattoos as the third physical attribute most likely to limit career potential” (Vigeland, 2012, para. 3). The key to obtaining a job when a person has tattoos is to get an impression of the workplace and to obtain information about the perspective employer on their personal policies. That way a person will know whether they should apply for the position or not. There are jobs where tattoos do not affect a person being hired. A few of those jobs are in construction, music, the automotive industry, film making, athletics, styling or the military. It appears most

Bucks Herald gives an example in his article “Workplace tattoos - the pros and cons” “If you work in a hairdresser’s salon, people do not want to see a tattooed arm washing their hair, or in a restaurant serving them food,” People easily prefer someone who looks hygienic rather than someone who does not to assist them. Going back to the articles “Tattoos Can Harm Perceptions: A Study and Suggestions”, Resenhoeft gives us many examples of physical risks “infection, scarring, exposure to blood borne illness, and allergic reactions” So tattoos can not only change how someone judges you but they can be bad for your

In conclusion, people have differing opinions about tattoos. "Tattoos: The Ultimate In Expression" is the better supported article

Older generations tend to have a negative view on individuals with tattoos and piercings because, until recently, the only people who had tattoos and piercings were gang members, bikers or convicts (Swanger, 2006). According to Foltz (2014), some older generations have more negative mind sets of tattoos than the younger generation, because many people in the older generations feel that people with ink on their skin or studs on their face were less intelligent and less reliable then someone without tattoos or piercings. Another survey cited by McElroy, Moore and Summers (2013) found that 87% of human resource managers said they have negative views toward applicants with visible tattoos and piercings and that visible modifications are judged more harshly than non-visible even if it means just covering them

To begin, Leanne Padowski has personal experience with this area. According to the article, "Our company's policy states that anyone who works in customer service cannot have a visible tattoo." Ms. Padowski deals first hand with the restrictions of visible tattoos, and therefore, this is a credible piece of evidence to support her argument. Mr. Johnson, on the other hand, is bias since

Most companies’ customer services’ employers cannot have a visible tattoo. Many believe it is not a professional appearance for their employers. A recent study showed that 31 percent of the employers did not get a promotion due to having a visible tattoo. An ultimatum is made by the employees; either they wear long-sleeve to cover their tattoos on their arm or get the tattoos removed. Tattoo

To start, some people think that tattoos give a bad impression and keep people from getting a job. However, "Johhn Challenger, the CEO of a consulting firm, says that the majority of employers look more at prospective employees' skills versus their appearance." This shows that tattoos do not have a great impact on public perception.

Tattoos are becoming very popular amongst the people of my generation, but now they seem to be creating more buzz than ever when it comes to today’s job market. Jon Kelly and Rachel Hennessey wrote articles covering this topic presenting the views of employers and their policies against tattoos. In both articles, they discuss how employers frown upon the art of employees inking. The biggest reason is because, some employers feel that tattoos deliver an unprofessional look to the customer and that can ruin the image built and portrayed by their prosperous companies.

Bridget Flynn, her article, “Do tattoos work against you?”, tattoos can work against job applications, on what is telling about tattoos are considered acceptable in some places, but others like to work in offices are very difficult to have a job in there. Sometimes people with tattoos can have a job like from offices or more important stuff, because they have a good study, and also experiences for work wherever they want to do. Others have really hard to find a job, but that’s why they just not have experiences, and they think is for them tattoos but isn’t. People can have a tattoo and they still have a great job.

However, people should not be denied a career because of the art they have on their bodies. Just because an individual has tattoos does not mean they are unprofessional or unworthy of a high-paying job. Colleges do not deny people an education because they have tattoos. If a person with tattoos has a higher education and a better background than someone without tattoos who is going for the same job, then the person with tattoos should get the job. But due to the nature of businesses, the person with less experience would most likely be the candidate picked based on appearance. In the workplace, when people look at someone that is covered in tattoos they automatically discriminate against this person. It is almost as if they think that image determines their demeanor and professionalism. This person can be the most courteous and professional person in the world, but no one would ever know because this person was not given a chance due to their appearance and the judgment of others.

Only 32% of students surveyed in Arkansas, California, and Ohio believe that having visible tattoos would hinder a person’s chance of getting a job. (Bevill, Bracy, Dale, Glasgow, & Roach, 2009) It is just what they believe, not what is true.

People argue that tattoos should never be shown in a professional setting. Most places of employment even have a dress code that requires you to cover them while working. Employers, in some settings, say that tattoos would or could be offensive or obscene. It was hard to find any article that was against tattoos in the workplace. After a while of searching the internet and databases, I found an article titled “Tattoos in the Workplace: The Research Forbes Was Too Lazy To Do” by Annie Singer. Written on February 26, 2016 and updated February 26, 2017, Singer’s research found that “consumers showed a preference for non-tattooed front-line staff.” She also found that “visible tattoos had a predominantly negative effect on employment selection, driven by the hiring manager’s

Although tattoos are popular, they can make it hard for a person to find a job.

There are many employers that have the opinion that having visible tattoos is unacceptable for the professional work environment. Someone with a tattoo is seen as uneducated and possible dangerous. However, there is no solid evidence to support either of those beliefs. The stigma of sporting a visible tattoo has no validity. A person with tattoos is just as knowledgeable and capable of working as a non-tattooed person. Tattoos, whether visible or covered, do not change a person’s individual work ethic or how educated they are.

Already at the beginning of the post, he mentions that people who want to remove their tattoos has increased by 20 percent, which most represents “recent graduates”, who clearly have an eye on getting a cushy city job.