Tax Policies, Health Care, And Crime And Capital Punishment

Human nature was one of the main issues the parties encountered. Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists thought that “Every man ought to be supposed a knave” he summarized, “and to have no other end in all his actions, but private interest.” In short he thought that all men put their own needs in front of the country’s needs. However Thomas Jefferson and the Republicans thought men could make there own choices for

Our country has mainly two political parties; their beliefs are on completely different sides of the political spectrum. These parties do not share the same view on government involvement in the citizen’s lives; one example being public programs such as healthcare plans. Due to the increase of public programs taxes must be increased and the Republican side is unhappy.

Despite the fact the founding fathers advised contrary to the establishment of political factions as the Constitution withstood the ratification process, a rift amongst men in President George Washington’s cabinet instituted the move toward the conception of political party. During the time period between 1791 and 1833, a two-party system had begun that demonstrated the philosophy of the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans. Although these two political groups were unyielding in their original ideas and beliefs, both had to change a few of their initial standpoints on numerous topics as they dealt with the truth of the government.

There are clear principles that distinguish Republicans from Democrats. Republicans are conservative while Democrats are liberal. Republicans believe that taxes shouldn’t be increased for anyone, and wages should reflect

America had just successfully broken away from Britain and was trying to establish itself as a new nation in the world. The Constitution was still in effect and holding the nation together and giving it boundaries to abide by. Many people had polarized views of the Constitution, some with a strict interpretation and others with a loose interpretation of the Constitution. It is these differing views, therefore, which created various political parties throughout the country. During the early 1800’s, there were many presidential elections with all the candidates looking to fill the rolls of their predecessors, George Washington and John Adams. Each candidate looked to leave a positive lasting impact on the growth and development of the United States. There were multiple candidates for each election, each with varying views on government and different issues to address during each election. The

The republicans had been the main people to push for adding a bill of rights to the Constitution before it was ratified. Both of these political parties had the same overall goal, however they had different views on various topics and problems. For example one of the the Federalist view was that the elite were the important ones, only about 105 of the population knew what it took to run a government. The Republican view on the other had was that the nation should be a mainly agricultural focused nation, because farmers were in many ways some of the smartest business mem. They had to plan for the future, know how to earn a living, have good communication with others for trade, etc. The opposition that often took place between these two groups and between men of the government , at times caused problems but also sometimes lead to brilliant outcomes or solutions. An example of a brilliant outcome that was the offspring of a heated battle or argument would be the Great Compromise. The Great Compromise was a proposal that solved many problems that the delegates of the Constitutional Convention, the main one being representation. This proposal would give all states representation in the lower house based solely on population, each slave would count as three-fifths of a person. And the upper house would represent each state equally with two delegates per state. This compromise demonstrated that the American people were willing to succeed and form a

In 1789, the U.S. did not have a two-party system. The two-party system is rooted in the beginnings of the nation itself. The Framers of the Constitution were opposed to political parties. The ratification of the Constitution saw the birth of America's first two parties: the federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, and the Anti-Federalists, who followed Thomas Jefferson. The nation had only had George Washington, who was President without a party at that time. During George Washington’s two terms, a conflict developed between John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, who were both Federalists men. Jefferson challenged Adams under the umbrella of the Democratic - Republican Party. In addition, the Democratic - Republican Party was the first real party that contained the formal beginnings of the present day two-party system. The word Democratic infers to “will of the people”, the word Republican infers to “rule of law” which is defense from possible oppression of the majority. In short, the American party system began as a two-party system. In this essay I will be discussing the why America needs a two-party system, why a multi-system may work for the nation and the conflicts, and how does this political system contributes to the nation and why a two-system is worth the struggle.

During the time periods between the 1830s and 1840s, two political parties: the Democratic party and the Whig party had faced the challenges among their ideological differences on the role of federal government in the economy and the westward expansion, but did compromise in certain ways. The one-party system of Monroe’s presidency had led to the creation of a two-party system under the presidency terms of Andrew Jackson. The supporters of President Jackson were known as the Democrats and the supporters of Henry Clay and Daniel Webster, rivals of Jackson, came to be known as the Whigs. The Democrats were influenced by Thomas Jefferson, whereas the Whigs were influenced by Alexander Hamilton. The Democrats were in favor of states’ rights and opposed the growth of a powerful central government. Democrats also favored in rapid territorial and external growth. The Whigs were in favor of a stronger federal government that was dominated by Congress. Whigs also favored gradual territorial expansions and internal improvements. In future reference, the Democratic and Whig party created the two political parties in which we see today, the Democratic and Republican Party.

Government has been a paramount piece of the United States’s development after July 4, 1776. The role of government has been pivotal to the process of how America operates today. Government is an important part of America’s society because it protects individual rights of people. Government is a forever changing entity because it is a necessity to satisfy the people’s demands. As a political party, Democrats and Republicans have many views on different topics in America. Although the Democrats and Republicans may have different stances on modern issues in America, many of these politicians seem to have the same attitude toward changing policies on these issues/government. I believe that the democratic party is more appropriate party to represent the United States because of their philosophy. The traditional values of America needs to be altered and the democratic party represents the change that America needs. The democratic party best represents an ever-changing society by exemplifying the desires of the citizens as is apparent in their policies in regards to abortion, gun control, and same-sex marriage.

During the Revolutionary period of the 19th century, there were two dominating political parties that had conflicting beliefs: the Democratic-Republicans and the Federalists. The Democratic-Republicans were strict-constructionists and believed that the constitution should be taken as literally as possible. The Federalists on the other hand, were broad constructionists and believed that just because the constitution did not explicitly state something it didn't mean there wasn't an implied meaning. The characterization of these two political parties were shown to be inaccurate during the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, because both men found themselves straying from their beliefs in certain circumstances in order to insure the best for their country.

The United States began as a weak, newborn nation that grew into a large, self-supporting country with a governing body unique to this time period. As the government grew and the nation prospered, the rise of leaders and political figures came about and with this, conflicting principles and ideology spawned, thus creating the first of the political parties; the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. Although the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans ideology and stances on the power of the federal government, domestic economic policies and the group of constituents they represented differed vastly, members of both parties often compromised their own beliefs for the nation’s best interest as a whole.

When the first Democratic-Republican president, Thomas Jefferson, was elected in 1801, the party’s ideas were designed to reflect the concepts of strict constructionism and rights of the states. Representatives of the political party, especially the first two presidents, found it difficult to entirely correlate their decisions with beliefs of all party members. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison made attempts to follow the strict constructionist notion of their party; however the two presidents also went against this dogma for the good of the country during times of crisis and during periods that could potentially make the United States stronger in the future.

In the United States we are divided by the left and right side on the political spectrum; even further divided into political parties such as Republicans, on the right, and Democrats, on the left side. These two political parties show philosophical differences through their viewpoints on major topics such as the economy, separation of church and state, abortion, and gun control.

The democratic and republican platform differ vastly and have some agreements. For instance, the democratic party believes in decreasing military spending while republicans prefer to increase the spending. Also, democrats support the idea of abortion and Roe v. Wade while republicans oppose of this idea with a few exceptions. Economically, the democratic supports the idea of increasing tax rates for those in a certain high income range while republicans do not support the increase of taxes for anyone, including the wealthy. A major similarity between the two parties is foreign policy. The majority of these voters believe the US should lower the budget for foreign aid.

Republicans want to limit the number of social programs and encourage the individual states to be more active in their own social welfare. Democrats feel that more government is better, where the Republicans feel that the individual states should have more power. Democrats favor gun control legislation most of the time. Republicans do not seem as interested in that issue, and many Republicans can be viewed as pro gun advocates. Democrats favor affirmative action for minorities and women. Republicans favor helping the entrepreneur and tend to give tax breaks to big business. Democrats champion the cause of labor unions, while Republicans realizing that union votes are important, at the same time feel that labor unions have too much power and cost big business too much money. The next set of political differences about the issues of capital punishment and abortion rights are quite paradoxical. Democrats favor a woman’s right to choose, at the same time they are against the death penalty and want to rehabilitate prisoners. Republicans, many of them are pro-life as well as in favor of capital punishment and being tough on crime. Democrats want the government to be more involved in public education, and want more money dispersed for student loans. Republicans want the states to take the responsibility for educating their children and also want to provide vouchers as an alternative to public school. This issue is also tied to how Republicans are