Technology Being Used Is Camera Traps

DNA forensics is a division of forensic science that focuses on the use of genetic material in criminal investigation to answer questions pertaining to legal situations, including criminal and civil cases. Through DNA testing, law enforcement officers are able to identify human remains or the individual responsible for a crime. DNA testing is a highly advanced scientific process that involves replicating the human DNA sequence to create a genetic map of an individual. Because of its reliability, DNA testing has become a significant factor in criminal cases. However, it has also been identified as having the potential to violate privacy and constitutional rights. The DNA identification process consists of five stages. These five stages

The increasing power and functionality of technology has increasingly invaded privacy and complicated security. Technology has made it possible for the government to

Although technology has provided tools to enhance our capabilities in things such as finding a missing person, solving murder cases based on technological assets etc.., this technology also leaves us vulnerable in many ways to slowly losing our privacy (Burten, C., 2012).

DNA profiling involves testing mini-satellites one at a time which then goes on to produce an image which is much simpler than genetic fingerprinting. It provides a pattern which is unique to a particular person and is therefore suitable for forensic purposes. (Turnpenny, P et al 2005).

It’s a bright Sunday morning; the birds are chirping, the smell of fresh coffee is in the air and you turn on the tv; “Another Leak Of All Verizon Users Personal Information Out On The Web” is today's headline on the news. In our society right now; the government has the utmost power; yet they might not be using their powers in ways you’d expect. If you're a daily electronic users at Urbandale High School who spends at least 30 hours a week using online functions for entertainment or work; then you might not have heard or seen what the government's been doing recently. In an in depth analysis shows that our life we’re living right now could be seen as a dystopian universe over 50 years ago. Yet as our nation advances, its being advanced in

With our nation’s tragedy of September 11, 2001, arose a deeply shaken America, shocked by the extent of the cruelty. An act of terrorism of that magnitude had never been seen before in our country. Patriots quickly came together, supporting the president to pass legislation, known as the USA Patriot Act, to tackle internal and external threats to this nation. The debate ensued, focused on which types of surveillance technology should or shouldn't be allowed for arresting terrorists. However, the question remains as to how these devices are going to be used, and how personally are those who use them held accountable. The purpose of this paper is to confirm that the proposed monitoring and archiving of users’ information on

Government surveillance in the past was not a big threat due to the limitations on technology; however, in the current day, it has become an immense power for the government. Taylor, author of a book on Electronic Surveillance supports, "A generation ago, when records were tucked away on paper in manila folders, there was some assurance that such information wouldn 't be spread everywhere. Now, however, our life stories are available at the push of a button" (Taylor 111). With more and more Americans logging into social media cites and using text-messaging devices, the more providers of metadata the government has. In her journal “The Virtuous Spy: Privacy as an Ethical Limit”, Anita L. Allen, an expert on privacy law, writes, “Contemporary technologies of data collection make secret, privacy invading surveillance easy and nearly irresistible. For every technology of confidential personal communication…there are one or more counter-technologies of eavesdropping” (Allen 1). Being in the middle of the Digital Age, we have to be much more careful of the kinds of information we put in our digital devices.

Ever since day one, people have been developing and creating all sorts of new methods and machines to help better everyday life in one way or another. Who can forget the invention of the ever-wondrous telephone? And we can’t forget how innovative and life-changing computers have been. However, while all machines have their positive uses, there can also be many negatives depending on how one uses said machines, wiretapping in on phone conversations, using spyware to quietly survey every keystroke and click one makes, and many other methods of unwanted snooping have arisen. As a result, laws have been made to make sure these negative uses are not taken advantage of by anyone. But because of how often technology changes, how can it be

One technological improvement in law enforcement that makes the job more effective/efficient is body cameras. These cameras capture events and interactions that take place between and among suspects, victims, and officers. According to page 513, body cameras can be used to resolve disputes and build trust with the community by preserving a record of critical events. This technology is used by the police for two purposes. One purpose is it used to increase police accountability. The second purpose is it has the potential to increase the effectiveness of the police response to crime. This technology can make the job more effective because now with these cameras there can at least be a little more evidence. Another thing is this technology may

The United States is a very advanced country in terms of technology. One could say that this is the nation’s most vulnerable point. Over the last decade more companies have allowed technology to replace fundamental items such as paper records, medical charting, all the way down to the simplest aspect such as handwritten letters or notes. According to Republican Senator from Arizona and chairman of the Senate Judiciary subcommittee on

With our dependency on technology and computers growing in just about every aspect of our lives, from at home to business, we are leaving our information out there for anyone who has the desire to try to get that information. When computers were first used by business and the government it was easy to secure the information stored on the room sized machines. It was as simple as securing the building and rooms that they were in. Now after the invention of the World Wide Web and how we are connected through a series of networks from Personal Area Networks to Wide Area Networks, Any criminal that has the computer skills can potentially gain access any information they desire. Securing our information on our computers and over the networks we use

Poaching is becoming less and less popular with ivory and the elephant tusks and today the elephants are thriving in the 21st century. A man named Desire Dondego was a killing machine, but now helps the elephants live and thrive. Poachers can be hunted illegally or legally and if you hunt somewhere where it is illegal, they can get arrested and go to prison

The excessive use of the internet and its tools, is only feeding the government’s way of collecting data. There is no privacy, and rights are being violated. Everything and everyone is being tracked and monitored. No one is conscious of what it means to have technology take control over every aspect of life. Dave Eggers serves as a voice of warning, and should be heard so “men [do not] begin to think like computers”

This form of DNA narrows the pool of suspects to those with the same mother. However, it is difficult to distinguish between persons with the same maternal blood line. As scientific methods evolve they are continually challenged by expert scientist. Every method can be fairly challenged due to the variety of flaws documented over time. Evidence has the potential to exonerate and or uphold as the necessary numerous cases where the use of DNA. This type of testing has replaced the business as usual microscope analysis of hair

In recent years, wildlife products such as ivory and rhino horn have become increasingly targeted due to the endless demand in Southeast Asian traditional medicine and trinket markets. World Wildlife Fund (WWF) presents statistical data, that corroborates this sentiment beginning in 2003, where in South Africa alone rhino poaching increased by 9000% from 2002. These trends are also not isolated to South Africa, which presents the case that wildlife trafficking levels through the continent have since reached pandemic