Teenage Driver Observation Paper

The person was younger than the legal drinking age in the state at the time of the citation, AND

He was told that the hypnosis was the final part of his test, when in reality, whether or not he signed the application was the last test. The quote “He said, ‘No harm done, son. You just took the last part of your driver’s test.’ ” exhibits the lie that the examiner told Robert. As a result, Robert thought the test was over, when in reality, whether or not he had signed the application was the deciding factor. Thus, the test that was used on Robert was unfair, because Robert had not been informed of the truth regarding his test. Lastly, it’s likely that most people have failed the test in a similar fashion and the test was not a measure of Rober’s competence in regards to driving, so he should be granted a driver’s license. The quote “As they pulled, his rubber heels slid along the two grooves worn in the floor.” implies that many have also failed the test. The worn grooves in the floor indicates that numerous people have also failed the driver’s test and was dragged away. This supports the fact that it was not Robert’s lack of skill that resulted in his failure, but it was the unfair design of the test

Mr. Smith was involved in an automobile accident last year which caused severe injuries to his leg.

Two people were found in the car the driver, Paul Haring, 24 years old, and the passenger,

I made a passenger side approach and was greeted by the driver who later identified as James T Smith II and the passenger, Brandon Smith. I asked the driver for his license, registration, and insurance. Smith II produced the vehicle's paperwork, and advising me that his license and his wallets were left at home. The driver claimed that his name was Nase Reid with a date of birth of 4/9/1991, an address of 257 2nd ave North Brunswick and that he has license in New Jersey and New York.

GULDEN requested his vehicle to be parked in the parking lot across the street if allowed. I advised that it would be fine. Off BOWMAN moved the vehicle and secured the car for GULDEN. PITKITUS had a friend come to the location of the stop to pick him up. GULDEN was transported back to the police dept. after the blood test where the same friend from before waited to give him a ride home. The friend who transported them was Adam JEVELLE in a Dodge Ram pick-up.

Fred is drunk and driving his dad’s car. Fred is a 21 year old student at Columbia College. Fred rams into a parked car at 10th and Rogers. Thinking no one saw him; Fred moves his car and parks it on an adjacent lot. He sprints to his dorm room in Miller Hall. A neighbor saw the wreck and Fred running to the dorm. Police are called and they arrive ten minutes after the wreck. The officers see several empty beer cans and a bottle of tequila (half full) in the front seat. The tags are traced to Fred’s dad, who is called by police. Dad says that Fred is a student at Columbia College. Police run Fred's record and determine that he has two prior DWIs within the past five years. The third DWI in 10 years is a felony. Police contact

On 02/11/2016 at 1436 hours, I was dispatched to Wawa (1060 Delsea Drive) for a report of an intoxicated male fumbling to unlock his blue Ford F-150 that was parked in the parking lot. Upon my arrival, I observed the vehicle in question leaving the parking lot traveling northbound on Delsea Drive. P/O Ziegler #5196 who arrived with me was able to conduct a motor vehicle stop on the above vehicle as I turned around in the parking lot of Wawa. After I arrived to the stop, P/O Ziegler and I approached the F-150 bearing NJ registration E80GFJ from the passenger side. As I requested the driver now identified as Shawn J. Hammell for his credentials, I observed his hands to be shaking and fumbling as he turned over his documents to me. I then ask Shawn if

I made contact with the driver and requested a driver's license and insurance. The driver was unable to provide a driver license or insurance. He provided a State of Illinois Identification Card with the name of Rivera, Alejandro DOB 10/09/98. Rivera was checked through LEADS which revealed he had a driver's permit with no wants or warrants. While speaking with Alejandro I detected an odor of cannabis emanating from inside the vehicle. Alejandro related that there was cannabis underneath the passenger seat hidden in an ArmorAll container. At this time Alejandro turned over a ArmorAll container with two (2) small blue plastic bags containing cannabis (4.0 grams). There was also a half rolled cigar paper containing cannabis, cigar paper, and cigar inside the container. The two (2) passengers in the vehicle were identified as Martinez, Jose L. DOB 05/25/99 and Saavedra, Angel I. DOB 11/22/98. They were checked through LEADS which revealed no record. Jose and Angel were in the closest proximity to the container with the cannabis.

On 10/28/2015, at approximately 0232 hours, Captain O'Neill and your Affiant observed a red Chrysler PT Cruiser (PA Registration JWA5451) traveling south on State Route 924. The operator of the vehicle was observed and identified as Dawn HERRING. HERRING'S driver's license was expired and suspended for driving under the influence; the information was verified through a certified Pennsylvania Department of Transportation record. HERRING was observed traveling under the posted speed limit and repeatedly swayed her vehicle throughout the lane. Your Affiants activated the emergency lights on the marked patrol vehicle and stopped HERRING at the entrance of the Transfer Station.

I then made contact with the driver of the vehicle who identified herself using a State of Florida issued driver license as Emilia Correa D.O.B. 11/22/1985. Correa stated she had just left a cigar lounge where she consumed “a few” alcoholic beverages. Correa stated she was on her way to eat before going home. However, while speaking with Correa her statements were inconsistent and briefly delayed similar to those under the influence. Based on statements made during the initial contact and my observations I asked her to exit her vehicle to continue speaking with her. I then asked Correa

Therefore, in these circumstances I would rule to revoke Respondent’s driver’s license since his BAC was well over the legal limit of 0.08 and because the officer administered the test within a reasonable time. Even without the officer present to testify, there should be enough evidence presented for a revocation of the Respondent’s license pursuant to C.R.S. §

When his mother was asked if there were alcohol at the party, she told them it was none of their business.” (handout) So far Allen has not broken any laws but make the choice to drink. The problem however is when the party gets out of hand and Allen and the mother’s boyfriend get into an altercation. The entire case is about this altercation. In this altercation Allen was defending himself and not committing criminal assault. Self-defense is “the use of reasonable force to protect oneself or members of the family from bodily harm from the attack of an aggressor, if the defender has reason to believe he/she/they is/are in danger.” (Legal Dictionary). In Allen’s case, the altercation was started by the boyfriend making him the aggressor. The boyfriend also was the first to grad a weapon. The case study says “The boyfriend picked up a wrench to threaten and to hit Allen. In a rage, Allen picked up a brick and threw it at him” (handout). To Allen’s knowledge the boyfriend was a very real threat to him and could cause body harm to Allen. Allen is not guilty of criminal assault but I would suggest alcohol rehab and counseling for the family in hopes it will help Allen and his road to

The driver was barely able to stand, much less able to walk a straight line. Even before the test was performed, the woman clearly seemed drunk and the attitude of the officer indicated that he knew this.

Based on the crime intoxication is (also known as “drunken or disorderly conduct”) vary widely among states (Portman, 2015). Considering Smith has a clear record and took a plea deal offered by the prosecutor for Criminal Trespass and Public Intoxication. It doesn’t state rather or not Smith’s Criminal Trespass charge was a threat to injure someone physically]y and or to enter one’s home or workstation and being intoxicated in public is a form of disturbs the peace and harms society and there for should be punished as a crime. It seems Smith has a clean criminal background, is a family man, and lives and works in the same community where he was raised. He was just caught up in a situation that has caused him to drink and make some bad discussions.