Tell-Tale Heart Argumentative Essay

To begin with, the narrator is guilty of premeditated murder because he planned to dispatch the innocent man. Throughout the short story, Edgar Allan Poe describes the events leading to the confession and made some points clear that he is guilty of premeditated murder. For example, the narrator tells the readers that he has been stalking the old man for seven nights just at twelve. “I was never kinder to the old man than during the whole week before I killed him … to suspect that every night, just at twelve, I looked upon him while he slept.” (Poe) As you can see, the narrator is clearly devising a plan to kill the old

The second reason why this man deserves justice is because he was obviously having some sort of mental breakdown at the time of his “crime”. He seems to be violently angry and very anxious. In the story, my client had just killed the old man and begins conversing with himself, “--do you mark me well I have told you that I am nervous: so I am. And now at the dead hour of the night, amid the dreadful silence of that old house, so strange a noise as this excited me to uncontrollable terror” (3). This quotes helps prove that the narrator is innocent for plea of insanity because he is showing another major symptom of a mental disease- anxious or violent outbursts. The man even admits to being nervous before he killed the old man. The quote also describes how the old man's dead heart still beating in the narrator's mind and is taking over his thoughts. My client also connects his hypnotic state to bringing him “uncontrollable terror”. This supports his symptoms of anxiety because it shows his mind being taken over by his nervousness. Towards the end of the text, the narrator feels too guilted and lets his anger get the best of himself, “I foamed --I raved --I swore! I swung the chair upon which I had been sitting, and grated it upon the boards, but the noise arose over all and continually

The narrator in Tell Tale Heart may have been mentally unstable by the end of his story, but was he mentally stable when he committed the murder? The evidence strongly suggests that he was mentally stable when he commited the crime because he knew what he was doing. When he suffocated the old man, he went so far as to chop up the body and hide it under the wooden tiles of his own home, and he was happy when he realized that he killed the man so that he didn't have to look at his eye anymore. All of this evidence points to him knowing what he was doing and realizing the consequences, which implies that he was mentally stable.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: there can be many different perspectives seen in a poem. One individual could read a poem as depressing and another can perceive it as a new beginning. One’s views rests on individual perspectives. For example, Edgar Allen Poe’s writing is dark and controversial. In my essay I will argue that Poe was not in his right mind and he was driven mad with evidence throughout his short story “The Tell-Tale Heart”.

Janet Portman, an attorney, claims that 1% of defendant's offer an insanity defense in less than 1% of all felony cases, and are successful only about one-quarter of the time. Although, I can guarantee this man is crazy. In ‘Tell Tale Heart”, a short story by Edgar Allan Poe, one is telling us how he killed another old man. The old man had cardiacs in one eye, the man who is describing him is telling us that the old man’s eye was as a vulture’s eye, and how it would run his blood cold whenever it fell upon him. The narrator decided to kill him, and once he had and hid the body the police came and he was cool for a while then he started to get uncomfortable then told the police he did it, he killed the man. While some may claim that the

In Edgar Allan Poe’s short story “The Tell-Tale Heart,” a man is murdered and dismembered at the hand of an insane unnamed narrator. The narrator goes on to defend his sanity by pushing the audience question what it means to be sane. When an opportunity arises for the narrator to convince officers that all is normal, he collapses under the weight of his guilty conscious. The actions of the unnamed narrator illustrate an image of today’s society and its view of mental illnesses, but overall makes the audience question the meaning of insanity.

Your Honor, Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, the defendant in Edgar Allen Poe’s “The Tell-Tale Heart” is guilty of First degree murder is when a person kills another human being and has planned and thought about it.

The narrator in “The Tell-Tale Heart” is afraid of the old man’s eye to the point of obsession. The narrator justifies murder with his fear of the old man’s “eye! Yes, it was this! One of his eyes resembled that of a vulture(74). The a pale blue eye, with a film over it. Whenever it fell on me, my blood ran cold” (74). The narrator describes the eye of the old man and uses his fear of it to justify murdering him. The eye symbolizes judgement because it makes the narrator feel like he is living under the shadow of this old man and that he will never be as good as the old man. By obsessing over the eye, the narrator is prevented from thinking clearly causing him to go insane because when one focuses on one thing then he or she will base every choice in the best interest of the obsession instead of a choice that is based on the best interest of the situation. This conveys the message that obsessing over things will cause insanity because if one only focuses on his or her obsession, then he or she will not be able to see things differently or think in a different

The stories, “The Tell-Tale Heart” and “The black cat have many similarities and differences, which makes them vey identical but also different. Both main characters of the stories are telling there background info like they have been in jail, they are trying to tell the story as calmly as they can so that they can prove their point. Both stories are equivalent in mood and tone by using harsh and evil words, and also has disparities of opinions and actions. Both stories have many things in common with one another. The opening or the introduction of both of the stories is the same, where both gives us a flashback of their lives to current time.

On the eighth night, the narrator loses his so-called insanity and goes in to kill the man. The way the narrator describes the events leading up to the murder of the eye and concealment of the body is precise and sly. The dramatic irony at the end of the tale describes just how delusional the narrator is; his guilt was making “a mockery” of him. Hearing the heart beating in a ringing tone, louder and louder, he shirked “dissemble no more! I admit the deed! Tear up the planks! - here, here! - it is the beating of his hideous heart!” (40). The narrator hears the heart of the old man at the end of the tale in his head, showing the credibility of the tale and the characteristics of the character. The ending of the story merely describes in one sentence that maybe now he knows he has a disease for the worse.

In the story, “The Tell-Tale Heart”, a borderline insane narrator named Mr. Heart attempts to persuade the reader that he is sane by recalling events from his past. He talks of his experiences with Mr. Man, an old man with a pale, “evil” eye which he possesses an extreme disdain for. After thoroughly reviewing the case, all evidence points towards the verdict that Mr. Heart is guilty of first degree murder because the crime was premeditated, deliberate, and malicious.

In Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Tell-Tale Heart” the author uses dictation and word choice to portray the narrator as cunning. The old man had never done harm to the villain; he was very nice to him, in fact. But what drove the antagonist mad was the Old Man’s eye. His eye resembled a vulture, pale blue with film over it. Killing the man became his top priority after having the idea.

The Tell-Tale Heart is about a crazed man telling his story of how he who convinces himself that his housemate has an eye like a vulture that is dangerous to him. After stalking his housemate for 7 nights, he finally kills him by suffocation.Based on the account of the old man’s murder by the narrator, the murderer has proven himself to be criminally insane. Therefore if he were put on trial, he would not be guilty of premeditated murder.

“Sanity calms, but madness is more interesting.” -John Russell. Ah, how true that is. In “The Tell-Tale Heart” by Edgar Allen Poe, the main character is much more than just mad. He’s obsessed, and in the end, guilty.

For eight nights in a row, the storyteller went to the old man’s chamber and cast a shred of light upon the Evil Eye that he so hated. For seven nights, it was always shut, and the storyteller could do nothing because it was only the eye that he hated, not the old man. On the eighth, the storyteller accidentally makes some noise and wakes the old man up. As a result, the storyteller can finally face his tormenter. At this point of the story, the storyteller's madness amplifies significantly. For an hour he stood at the old man's chamber door quietly. In his madness, which he insists it's just an "over-acuteness" of his senses, he believes he hears the beating of the old man's heart. At first, he reveled in the old man's terror but with every moment that he heard that beating sound his fury grew more and more. The more nervous he became, the faster and louder the beating sound became. When he could take it no more, the storyteller goes into a paranoid frenzy. During this frenzy, the storyteller is afraid that neighbors will hear the beating of the old man's heart. This causes him to take action. He quickly subdues the old man and kills