Temporary Injunction Against Domestic Violence

Out of the shadows and into the limelight, the once hidden crime of domestic violence has recently emerged within the Australian community as a widespread criminal issue. This abuse of power occurs in a relationship when one partner attempts to physically or psychologically dominate and control the other. Inflicting physical harm upon another human being is undoubtedly a breach of the criminal law, yet the Australian legal system takes little measures to protect the wider community from this type of violence. According to Family Lawyer Richard Ingleby, domestic violence has often been condoned by the legal system due to the fact that assaults occur in the ‘private’ realm of the home where legal measures are regarded as inappropriate, and interventionist. However, by overlooking domestic violence as a criminal offence, does the Australian legal system fail to adequately protect the family unit from this form of violence? Recent studies from the Australian Bureau of Statics have revealed that 23% of women who have ever been married or engaged in a de facto relationship have experienced violence by a partner at some time during the relationship. Due to the secrecy that once surrounded this kind of abuse, victims often feel unable to speak out and seek help, therefore even large surveys cannot provide accurate estimates of the extend of domestic violence within the Australia community (Domestic Violence and Incest Resource Centre, 1998). Despite the high incidence rate of

This literary writing will attempt to examine the impact of domestic violence (DV) in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender community (LGBT). Domestic violence is prominent in a homosexual relationship, if not more so than in a heterosexual relationship (White & Goldberg, 2006). Domestic violence is also associated with intimate partner violence (IPV) (Dunne, 2014). Statistically, domestic violence rates are higher than heterosexual domestic violence with IPV (Fox, 2010). Knowing that domestic violence brings about a plethora of disparities, it is solidified

The Congress of the United States in 1994, as part of the Crime Bill, passed law allowing the federal government to take part in the battle against domestic violence. This new law, named the VAWA, acknowledged that "violence against women is a crime with far-reaching, harmful consequences for families, children and society" (Domestic and Sexual Violence Data Collection, A Report to Congress under the Violence Against Women Act, 1 [NIJ Research Report 1996]). To fight this violent crime problem, VAWA made federal domestic violence crimes to be act against by the Department of Justice. Reliable with this federal inventiveness, the Crime Bill also modified the Gun Control Act to embrace domestic violence-related crimes. Congress reiterated its commitment to fight domestic violence crimes by the performing in the fall of 1996 of extra federal domestic violence crimes in both VAWA and the Gun Control Act. The federal government has largely lacked authority over several domestic violence crimes. However domestic violence remains primarily a matter of state and local jurisdiction.

Wettersten et al. explain that income stability is a reason why many women stay in a violent relationship (448). They declare that many women who live in a violent home do not have control over finances. In addition, Wettersten et al. found that women who live in poor households tend to stay in violent relationship as well (448). Furthermore, Few discovered that religious women tend to stay in an abuse relationship because of what people would say about them separating from their abusive husband (494). She explains that for these women, the marriage is sacred, even if that means to put up with domestic violence. (494).

The problem of domestic violence poses a danger to all the members the family unit. In addition, women and men are both ?equally likely to initiate and engage in partner aggression? (Stop Abusive and Violent Environments

Critically analyse what you consider to be the most significant changes in the criminal justice system relating to one particular area.

The federal government passed two laws related to domestic violence against women, the Family Violence Prevention and Services Program (FVPSA) and the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). Congress, first passed the FVPSA in 1984 to address domestic violence. Federal funding is provided and allocated to support domestic violence shelters and services for survivors, to include a national domestic violence hotline, and domestic violence prevention activities (Fernanders-Alcantara, 2017). Funding allocated for FVPSA was a little over $164 million in FY2017. Shelters, support services, and programs support received approximately $150 million. The National Domestic Violence Hotline received approximately $8.2 million. A program called Domestic Violence Prevention Enhancement and Leadership Through Allies, that supports selected communities to prevent domestic violence, received an average of $5.4 million (Fernanders-Alcantara, 2017).

There are many types of legislative actions concerning human services issues across the United States. The National Conference of State Legislatures website offers numerous state legislatures regarding domestic violence, child support, sexual assault, and more. The legislation I have chosen to focus on is in Louisiana, regarding domestic violence and child custody.

The NSW legal system has responded to the issue of domestic violence to achieve justice for family members. The Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 was introduced to better protect victims and the families of domestic violence. Under section 38 of this act, Apprehended Domestic Violence Order (ADVO’s) were introduced to protect the adult, importantly, it also instantly includes any children that are living with the adult at the time, unless there are valid reasons as to why they should be let off. This is highly effective for the family of domestic violence as it also ensures the safety of children which demonstrates fairness and equality as all members of the family are included to ensure safety. This act was also significant

Domestic violence is a crime that has increased in the recent years; therefore, recently, domestic violence has become a widely researched topic. Some of the extensive research regarding domestic violence “indicates that intimate partner violence arrest rates have risen as a direct result of the implementation of mandatory and preferred arrest domestic violence laws. However, this research also suggests that part of this increase can be attributed to an increase in the arrest rate of females in cases of domestic assault. In addition, the arrest of both parties involved in an incident, also known as a “dual arrest,” appears to have contributed to the rising rates of domestic assault arrest” (Hirschel et al., 2007, p. 255). In other words, it

Domestic violence is a sensitive topic that must be regarded with caution. Many victims suffer from violence, but are afraid to speak up and voice their personal experiences. Victims of domestic abuse are frequently women, but men can also be victims. If mandatory arrest laws exist, there is a higher likelihood that the victim will contact law enforcement officials. If such policy is emplaced, it “requires a police officer to make an arrest when responding to a domestic violence call if there is probable cause to believe any violence has occurred” (Top Ten Series, 2011). In other words, this simply means that regardless of what the victim wants to do, the officer will arrest the aggressor, even if the aggressor has previously been the victim.

In the play Proof!, Nottage chose humor as an entry point to address domestic violence. Nottage chose humor to address domestic violence to exhibit how trap a woman in an abusive relationship is and the only way they could be free is to get away from their attacker. This shown in the character of Lauren. In the play, the first and last interaction of her husband, Samuel, shows the type of relationship Samuel and Lauren had. In the play it Samuel says “ WHEN I COUNT TO TEN I DON’T WANT TO SEE YA! I DON’T WANT TO HEAR YA!” then Lauren says “DAMN YOU TO HELL, SAMUEL!” Both of these quotes explain how Lauren’s relationship with her husband was mostly yelling and arguing. Lauren wishes for him to go to hell, she wants him to die to not her more

Domestic can be defined in many ways but the simplest meaning is ‘involving the home or family’ whereas violence means an ‘act of aggression as one against a person who resist’. In addition, violence does not relate to relationship problem or issue but is social context of reflection of a man overruling woman. It happens to all walks of people in life despite of age, sex, race, assets and cartography. Notwithstanding, scoop by both male and female endure hurts during intimate relationship, domestic violence is greatly impact by both gender.

DZC is a Howard County Resident, she has three daughters in Honduras for whom she provides financially. Her older daughter was a victim of domestic violence, she had to flee the country because the last time he beat her he almost killed her. She never told her mother that she was coming to the USA with her granddaughter, once she was in Texas she called her to let her know what had happened and that to ask for money to come to this area to live with her.

Another consequence is the state is also taking half of his paycheck now. All of