Terrorism And Terrorism : The Different Forms Of Terrorism

Ever since 9/11 when both World Trade Center buildings were attacked by an Islamic Group, attacks by Islamic Terrorist on U.S. soil have been less of a threat than Domestic Terrorists. Domestic Terrorism has been shown these passed for years but yet again most of these cases have not been classified as acts of Domestic Terrorism they most likely fall into the category. Now the definition of Domestic Terrorism is basically "the committing of terrorist acts in the perpetrator 's own country against their fellow citizens". Now personally I don 't know how our government is working with these popular cases like Charlottesville, Las Vegas, and a new that just happened recently actually two but I 'll just say one, the New York attack that

Terrorism is the use of force or violence against persons or property in violation of the criminal laws of the United States for purposes of intimidation, coercion, or ransom. (CT2Learn, 2017. Pg 148) Terrorism can take many forms such as biological/chemical attacks, bombings, kidnappings, hijackings, cyber terrorism, agricultural terrorism, and WMDs. Each attack creating different potential risks to first responders such as chemical and biological hazards as well as other secondary threats like secondary weapons/explosives, infrastructure instability, and fires. It is with local and federal preparation through strategic planning, evaluation of previous incidents, and training of first responders that the risks associated with a terrorist attack

There were around fourteen attacks all in different countries that led to over four thousand deaths (statista.com). According to the FBI there are two basic types of terrorism which are domestic and international. The different types are based off of where the attack took place and the objectives that were made. Domestic terrorism can be defined in many different ways but the FBI defines it as the threatened us of force by a group of people. This can also be done by a single person but both either a group or a person does the attack inside of the United States. The international terrorism is any acts that are against a person’s life and is illegal (statista.com). Even though the FBI states there is only two types of terrorism, the National

The United States has had its share of terror attacks, whether it was a major destruction, or simpler destruction. On September 11th of 2001 (9/11), there was a major crisis after learning about the terror attacks that happened on the World Trade Center in New York. That is one of the most memorable terror attacks that took place in the Unites States. It was a series of terror attacks that took place and the Pentagon was also targeted during this time. It was determined that Islamic nations were targeting the United States to gain insight to their political views. The Islamic terrorist were so pressed on getting their points across that they didn’t care about the lives that stood in their way, including their own. Thousands of people lost their lives in these two attacks alone and millions were affected. Since then, terrorism has been a clear problem that has continued to show itself over time throughout the United States. Terrorism is not limited to the United States, in fact, terrorism has been linked to different areas of the world like Pakistan, Israel, Japan, and in the Philippines. Terrorism can be anywhere from bombing, plane-crashing, or just plain assassinating, as long as their means were to get a message across. One example for an assassinating shooting is the Orlando shooting that took place on June 12, 2016. The shooter was classified as just a gunman to some, but he was classified as a terrorist to others because of the actions he chose to take. He

If you could help your country by keeping groups that cause harm out,would you, or would you sit here watching the news everyday in fear of getting attacked and not take action? Radical groups are everywhere and are causing major fear in the United states today. These threats have to be stopped.

Acts of terror and violence have been committed for centuries from gruesome public beheadings to violent street battles (Zalman, 2017). It appears as time has passed there is more thinking behind the violent acts for selfish gains. The threat is real, and terrorists have their hands on anything form handheld tools to nuclear and biological warfare. Terrorist violence must be totally ruthless, for moral scruples and terror do not mix and one or the other must be rejected (Poland, 2017). This is the mindset of most terrorist groups or cults. There are multiple reasons for terrorist atrocities, one of the most obvious reasons is they can produce pure terror or like to instill fear into their target (Zalman, 2017).

Imagine this specific scenario for a moment, a young boy is walking on a sidewalk with his mother on their way to the grocery store. A car quickly swerves and slams into both the boy and his mother. The boy is killed and his mother has to deal and mourn the loss of her only child for the rest of her life. Put yourself in the mother's shoes. As we all know, terrorism and massive acts of violence are considerable threats in our society today, and so are cars. Just like the epidemic of mass shootings is a gun problem, the thousands of people slaughtered by cars as they walk our modern-day streets every year is a car problem.

The Declaration of Independence, the most influential document in our nation’s history, contains the phrase, “All men are created equal.” When Thomas Jefferson wrote this sentence in 1776, it carried with it the idea of hope, equality, and freedom. However, the once awe-inspiring phrase is now empty and meaningless. It's once patriotic and equitable message has been lost to the persistent and grotesque societal illness which is terrorism. Ever since the declaration of independence was created, terrorism has been on the rise. In fact, it has been on the rise after the widely known “9-11 terrorist attack.” Thus, terrorism has been on the rise due to discrimination, religion, and political grievances.

It depends on how you define terrorism, but the practice of terrorism can be traced back to at least to the 1st-century AD. Oxford Dictionary defines terrorism as; the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims. Edmund Burke says that the term "terrorism" itself originally meant the actions of the Jacobin Club during the "Reign of Terror" in the French Revolution. "Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible," said Maximilien Robespierre. Martha Crenshaw states that in January 1858, Italian patriot Felice Orsini threw three bombs trying to assassinate French Emperor Napoleon III. Eight bystanders were killed and 142 injured. The incident played a crucial role as an inspiration for the development of the early terrorist groups. In the 19th century, powerful, stable, and affordable explosives were developed, global integration reached unprecedented levels and often radical political movements became widely influential. Ben Saul has noted that a "A combination of pragmatic and principled arguments supports the case for defining terrorism in international law", including the need to condemn violations to human rights, to protect the state and deliberative politics, to differentiate public and private violence, and to ensure international peace and security. Carlos Diaz-Paniagua, who coordinated the negotiations of the proposed United Nations Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism,

Terrorism is the use of intentionally indis¬criminate violence as a means to create terror, or fear, to achieve political, religious, or ideological aim. Our book states that the use of terrorism as a tool ranges from individual acts of reckless destruction to property or persons to decidedly complicated events perpetrated by organizations with extreme social, environmental, religious, economic, or political agendas.(author of book) On November 5, 2009 one of the biggest military bases in the world was tested. Fort Hood Texas would have to answer a terrorist call that would change every bases emergency plan forever. This shooting is said to be the deadliest mass shooting on an American military base. Major Nidal Malik Hasan who was an Army psychiatrist, open fired killing 12 soldiers, one civilian, and wounded 43 others.

United States citizens have perceived terrorism as recent emergence, not a strategy or tactic that has raged over hundreds of years by various actors. For example, the expansion of European trade in South and Southeast Asia in the 17th century brought about violence by local Muslim population who felt their livelihood, culture and society was threaten by European influences. The encroachment and conquest by Europe was successful despite military campaigns and guerrilla tactic that was intended to hold the expansion at bay.

Terrorism has similarities to every day crime in regard to the preparation a terrorist seeks out before the attack. Criminals have to survey, elicit themselves, test security, acquire supplies, then deploy their plan. This is similar to terrorism where they have to survey, elicit themselves, test security, acquire funding and supplies, actively impersonate, rehearse, then deploy their plan. When law enforcement, emergency responders, and other government entities, are preparing their crews for potential crimes, there isn’t much difference between a terrorist attack and any other potential crime. The most common difference is that “terrorists are driven by a religious or political ideal, whereas the criminal is driven by greed (Newman and Clarke, 2008)”. First responders are the most important people after a terrorist attack has occurred and are exposed to the most risks thereafter.

Terrorism is the unlawful use of weapons and intimidation to inflict violence among citizens. Recent examples of terrorist attacks in the United States include the attacks on 11 September 2001, al Qaeda members hijacked four U.S. airlines. Another example is the Boston Marathon bombing on 15 April 2015, killing three and wounding almost three-hundred. Unfortunately, the United States were unable to counter these attacks or prevent them from happening because of the resources terrorists were able to use. The amount of risk first responders deal with is overwhelming. They not only put their own lives at risk but they also have the

Terrorism is described as the unlawful use of violence and intimidation especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims. In our own peaceful country of Canada, the "October Crisis" (also known as the "FLQ Crisis") that started on October 5th, 1970 is a perfect example of terrorism – an example that clearly shows that rebel groups that employ terror in civil wars, seldom win or gain what they hope to achieve (in this case, Québec's independence). The three main tactics that the FLQ (Front du Libération du Québec) used to achieve their own political agenda were certainly not the right things to pursue, to achieve independence. The scare tactics and violent tactics that the FLQ used during the October Crisis such as the detonation of bombs around Montréal destroying property and endangering innocent lives, the kidnapping of public officials and committing murder, certainly did not lead to peaceful negotiations or help to gain public support.

A fair amount of research has been conducted into the nexus between terrorism and narcotics traffickers in recent years. However, scholars differ regarding the extent to which these two types organizations are aligned. It has long been known that financing of terror activities using narcotics trafficking was occurring: Makarenko argues “since the end of the Cold War and the subsequent decline of state sponsorship for terrorism, organized criminal activities have become a major revenue source for terrorist groups worldwide.” She cites narcotics-terrorism interconnection as it developed in the 1980s in Latin America as the precedent, and posits that the 1990s are “the decade in which the crime-terror nexus was consolidated.” Makarenko goes on to theorize that the rise in transnational criminal networks and the changing nature of international terrorist organizations have resulted in the formation of alliances between the two types of organizations that require them to “now be viewed as a cauldron of traditional and emerging threats that interact with one another, and at times, converge.” It is in this framework that she outlines the “crime-terror continuum.” The detailed structure of the continuum consists of seven points organized into four groups: “alliances,” “operational motivations,” “convergence,” and the “black hole.” The theory states that an organization can move along the continuum between organized crime and terrorism “depending on the environment in which it