Terrorism Vs Terrorism

The word ‘terrorism’ can be traced back to the French Revolution and the reign of terror committed against the population of France in the 1790s. During this time, thousands of people were killed and the general population was severely oppressed. Also, some of the first instances of terrorist tactics, such as assassination and intimidation, were witnessed in the killing of prominent officials and other opponents of the Revolution. In general, terrorists aim to incite fear in the population through pre-meditated violent acts and gain publicity as a medium in achieving their goals. Such acts include taking hostages, bombings and assassinations, all of which create fear and compliance in a victim or audience. Terrorism can be distinguished from other types of political violence through its disregard for and intentional harming of innocent civilians. Also, terrorists usually adopt a state of mind where one side is always good and any opposition is bad and deserves to be punished. As a result, terrorists will always have some supporters who share the same radical thoughts as them and thus terrorism, as a whole, will always be accepted as a legitimate use of violence. This is the reasoning behind the famous phrase by Gerald Seymour, “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter”(QUOTE

Terrorism is an act of violence, usually done in the public sphere, which is used to incite fear in a population in order to coerce change in public opinion or a government’s position on an issue. In many parts of the world, groups wage war with their countries, either to separate from the government or to overthrow it entirely. Sometimes these people are treated unfairly by their government, and their struggles are justified. Other times, these groups use violence against both military and civilian targets, terrorizing innocent bystanders to get what they want—these groups are terrorists. Often, though, it is difficult to tell the difference.

The terms terrorism and domestic terrorism are very similar concepts. There are, however, slight differences in each. Entities that are apart of the Government have slightly different ways of explaining what they believe to be the correct definition of terrorism and domestic terrorism. In this paper the author will offer definitions of the two terms and state which one they agree with the most. The author will also state how the two terms are best differentiated.

The statement that one man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist is not valid and this is because the differences between the two are far more complex than perspective alone. The issue with perspective being the only distinction is in the difficulty to accurately define terrorism in a way synonymous to describing the characteristics of a freedom fighter. In examining the characteristics of numerous definitions it becomes evident that there is a distinction in the relationship which terrorists and freedom fighters have with civilians when carrying out their violent and politically motivated goals.

Terrorism is a big threat people in the world face today. Terrorism is defined by Cindy Combs as “a synthesis of war and theater, a dramatization of the most proscribed kind of violence - that which is perpetuated on innocent victims - played before an audience in the hope of creating a mood of fear; for political purposes.” In other words an act of terrorism is not for mass casualties but rather for attention. Terrorist seek an audience. They would rather kill one person and have the whole world see it than kill a whole city and no one knew about it. Through attention they believe they can create a fear in us the people. If the people are scared the government

Of the many problems that society faces today, terrorism is one that is more serious. The presence of terrorism can be felt across the globe, which make this issue a global concern. In all countries, whether they are developed or in the process of developing, this issue is always up for debate in todays society. History has shown us the clear evidence that the presence of terrorism is very much real and has gone through tremendous changes over the years. Terrorism now has become more difficult to control, more widespread, and more lethal. In todays society, terrorism is a serious challenge because of its presence around the world. Terrorists create chaotic conditions leading to mass murder and destruction to undermine the stability of society,

Hello, I respect your view but I want to give you another viewpoint. From what I have discovered terrorism has been in existence for ages, and is still relatively difficult to define by most people. Terrorism is defined as “using force to influence or change a political decision” (Dictionary, 2015). Through the word terror is clear when it becomes applied to acts, or acts it becomes confusing. After looking up the definition terrorism would in tales, crime of holy duty, or political tactic or strategy, an inexcusable abomination, or justified reaction to oppression. In both cases the Elf, Boston bombing or terrorist, however one may choose to evaluate the evidence. In Rachels and Rachel to do, we can be consists it states “In reasoning about

They think that will provide them to carry acts against innocent people but on the other hand, they see the other sides as pure evil or invader and must be destroyed. A good example of that is North Korea. They see the western nation as a threat to them and must be eliminated. In sociological perspective these terrorist organizations make someone believe that when an individual joins a group a new set of relationship develops between the people, like a big family. Terrorism is the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians in the pursuit of political gains. Terrorists attempt to deprive the state of its monopoly on violence, seek to acquire its own control of the use violence and they seek to provoke profound social and political change. Government and terrorism as such represent two major opposing forces in a battle for the directions of the world in this way. The existence of terrorism aligns with the conflict theory, which proposes that conflict between competing interests is the driving force of social

(4) Violence is central to both war and terrorism, but the objective and purpose of terrorism is entirely different. Terrorists seek to use intimidation to impose their agendas. They create fear and panic, extort concessions or weaken and discredit governments to show that the government is unable to protect their citizens. Terrorism is also used in the place of low cost strategic warfare, motivated by ideology, religion or nationalistic sentiments, to express protest and rage, advance fanatic agendas, and overthrow opposition governments. Countries such as Syria, Iran and Libya use terrorism as a form of diplomacy and as an adjunct to their foreign policies. * For these states, terrorism is an integral part of their negotiation strategies.

I would challenge you to look at insurgents as more of a political movement. While there may be similarities with extremists, since some insurgent groups have employed terrorism, their goals are more politically motivated. For example, look at the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt had overtaken the government with the support of the people utilizing mainly hearts and minds. Granted, the Muslim Brotherhood's ideals were altered over time to utilize threat tactics and tortures on their own people but this eventually lead to their downfall. They betrayed the people that had helped them rise. On the other hand, extremists employ terrorist utilize aggression against non-combatants with few internal reservations. Ultimately I believe both extremists and

Wars and terrorist attacks are both catastrophic events that occur all around the world.  War and terrorism both have some aspects that make them unique.  They also share some similarities such as destruction and fear.  Chris Hedges War is a Force That Gives us Meaning, the movie Why we Fight, and the RAND Corporation’s Terrorism Past and Present show some of these similarities and differences.

Terrorism in the twenty-first century has some similarities and differences from terrorism in the twentieth century. Terrorism is, in its broadest sense, the use or threatened use of violence in order to achieve a political, religious, or ideological aim. Also useful to remember that because the two entities involved, the terrorists and the terrorized, are on the opposite end of the political, religious or ideological continuum, the same act is viewed by them differently. There is much sense in the phrase one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.

In the article titled, “The spirit of Terrorism”, by Jean Baudrillard, 2001, He captures the notion that “evil is everywhere and is an incomprehensible object of desire” (pp.1). He further went on to explain that war is horrific and demeaning to humanity but it has its contribution. Furthermore, war ended, European supremacy and the colonial era, Nazism and Communism. I support this argument, there is evil all around us, lurking in wait. Many would argue that with war comes great suffering and pain, lost of lives, years of civilization has been wiped out with just a bomb and individuals who survive war are often emotionally, physically, and psychological damage. For example, when the U.S. dropped the bomb on Hiroshima. To rebuild a country to its original state after a war takes years but there is just cause for war. Hence, in the context of war done to achieve what is deemed as the greater good, we can draw on the example of eliminating Nazism, European reined and the fall of Sadam Hussian. Indeed, many innocent people lost their lives but the consequences of war are bloodshed and suffering.

For centuries the human race has seen blood spilled, a presence of dark clouds over your head, with the company of great terror that follows has always brought great suffering. War is the main event that will change history for the best or worst. There are only two reasons to start or to go to war: conquest of land (political view) or religion. Terrorism has been around since the Roman Empire and the Greeks, however the term terrorism was adopted during the French Revolution in the 1700 's.

Have you ever had a fear for your family, your town, your country, or your world. How about the fear to have everything taken from you, destroyed, and not caring if it has hurt you or not? What about your fear and pain is, and can be someone else’s happiness? The fear of you being terrorized? That is terrorism. Someone else bringing fear and terrorizing you. That is a terrorist’s goal. Terrorism is common and is very difficult to stop. The government promises protection for the people, and their home, but they can not give that protection if they can not stop terrorism. Terrorism needs to stop to protect the live of the people, and their country.