Terrorism and the Effects on Security Policies Essay

The sun rises to a deep spring-blue sky on Sunday the Fifth of May 2017; 51,000 people are converging on downtown Spokane for the 39th running of the Bloomsday road race. Thirty miles to the south, near the town of Fairfield, a small cluster of people watch from a distance as two men in protective coveralls and respirators pour fifty gallons of a clear fluid into the payload compartment of a Bell 300C helicopter. The crop duster, which was purchased for cash in Walla Walla, is a descendent of the Korean War era helicopters depicted on the television series MASH. After the liquid is loaded, and the outside of the helicopter is sanitized, the pilot runs

The word “terrorism” was first used during the French Revolution when British statesman Edmond Burke used the term to describe the actions of the Jacobin-dominated French government. Under the leadership of Maximilien Robespierre, thousands of people that were said to be enemies of the state were put on trial and then executed by use of the guillotine (O 'Connor, 2006). However, since the inception of the word, it has taken on a new meaning. One can now hear the word “terrorism” and be overcome by anger or even fear. Terrorism now seems to have turned to attacks against a government rather

National terrorism has been the focus of attention since September 11. But now domestic terrorism is becoming increasingly common among hate groups across the nation. Domestic terrorism can be defined as visible crime, or “street crime.” These acts would consist of violent crimes, (acts against people in which injury or death results) property crimes (acts that threaten property held by individuals or the state) and public order crimes. (acts that threaten the general well-being of society and challenger accepted moral principles) It can also however be described as political crime, (criminal acts by or against the government for ideological purposes) which would include the 9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombing.

The emphasis of counterterrorism policy in the United States since Al Qaeda’s attacks of September 11, 2001 has been on jihadist terrorism. However, in the last decade, domestic terrorists have killed American citizens and damaged property across the country. Not all of these criminals have been prosecuted under terrorism charges. This is not meant to imply that domestic terrorists should be taken any less seriously than other terrorists.

Let us start with the law; after a terrorist attack law always gets drastic changes in any country. For instance, after the 9/11 in United Stated, at least 11 laws has been changed, from what type of officers will work for the government and there has been a lot of viewing on the life’s of people. In some other countries such as India when they encountered the terrorist attack in Mumbai a special law for formed for interrogation of UAPA (Unlawful Activities Prevention Amendment) was passed, it changes the trial process of those who are accused in terrorist’s activities, extends the period of police custody and detention without charges and denies the bail to foreigners.

It has enhanced their confidence and allowed them to openly justify their violent activities by displacing their responsibility on their victims who are responsible for the state of affairs or activities through which the groups adopts violence. Though ideology, terrorists are able to accurately identify and develop a motive for their actions. The need for attention and political identity is another factor that motivates this particular organization towards terrorist activities (Drake, 2007). For example, in 1980 the Red Brigades of Italy violently tried to destabilize the Italian government through various acts of sabotage, kidnapping and robbery in an attempt to communicate the need for political change in the country by replacing it with a dictatorship form of government. Frustration was another factor that motivated this particular terrorist organization. For example, the group was formed to revolt against capitalism within the country’s industrial

War and violence are a normal part of the “War on Terror’” with two sides fighting over security and values that has cost the lives of many innocent people and damages that are unrepairable. Looking at the Madrid bombing in 2004 and how Europe could have created a stronger federal intelligence structures (Aldrich 2009) However, failed since many European countries were concerned that it would erode their own bilateral relations with the United States (Aldrich 2009). At the national level, several European political leaders openly criticized American intelligence activities such as the CIA secret prisons (Aldrich 2009). Europe has faced several bombings in 2004 and 2005 as a result of the rule of law in European countries is a target by terrorists

By the late 1960s, Italy had suffered through World War II. It had seen the Vietnam War unfold before them. Furthermore, it had experienced a dramatic urbanization from an agrarian society to an urban one. Such a shift precipitated the appeal for communism. Into this complicated political and socio-economic arena came the Red Brigades. The Red Brigades were an Italian terrorist organization with a strong emphasis on Marxism. Founded in 1969 by radical left-leaning students Renato Curcio and his wife Mara Cagol, the Red Brigades began a reign of terror that . In order to fully assess the impact of the Red Brigades in Italy, it is necessary to answer a central question: why were the Red Brigades so violent? The Red Brigades had ties to

Terrorism and the United States A cloud of anthrax spores looming in the sky of San Diego California

Terrorism in the twenty-first century has some similarities and differences from terrorism in the twentieth century. Terrorism is, in its broadest sense, the use or threatened use of violence in order to achieve a political, religious, or ideological aim. Also useful to remember that because the two entities involved, the terrorists and the terrorized, are on the opposite end of the political, religious or ideological continuum, the same act is viewed by them differently. There is much sense in the phrase one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.

The history of terrorism can be traced back as far as the French revolution. Some of these acts of terrorism only seem as distant reminders of our past, but at the same time, are not a far cry from today’s brutal acts; and although these acts seem distant, it doesn’t also mean they are no longer in the thoughts of individuals in today’s time.

The government can implement many new methods to increase security, or better yet give off the image of better security which is what they have predominantly done, yet ultimately there will always be a way to bypass or come up with a new way to infiltrate that measure. The government so far has done a variety of things ranging from the closing of the Dulles airport (permanently), working with the FAA on new security measures, having pilots carry handguns, and a not so specific, profiling.

With Isis constantly looming, and its threats and attacks throughout the world, it is shocking that Italy has yet to have a death caused by Muslim terrorism. Throughout the past 5 years, the Civil War in Syria has caused refugees to flea to many nearby counties. Italy’s Muslim population tops out at over two million, and a million of those fled to Italy since February of this year alone. This influx of people didn’t come without caution. The Italian government was aware of the possible Isis threat, and took

The immediacy and the primacy of any truly potent force is the ability to perpetuate itself. Sharp and energetic outbursts have their place, and can be known to have great effect-cataclysmic forces, despite their maximum destructive potential, are temporary in their total effects in relation to some absolute goal. In other words, they are generally limited in scope, and well defined in purpose; there is a tactical objective, which is usually consummated quickly. The more dreaded force creeps along, escalating incrementally, and while it may abide a strategic goal, or even a policy, it is generally open-ended. This sort of ambiguity I am referring to differs from the flexible tactical necessity in that strategic outcomes are very much

Purpose: To inform readers of the effects the recent terrorist attacks have on society today.