preview

Terrorist Attacks On 9 / 11 Cia Interrogation Tactics

Decent Essays

After the terrorist attacks on 9/11 CIA interrogation tactics were heighten to rapidly expedite the extraction of information that could lead to the interception of a future terrorist attacks. The Bush Administration was in control during this period of time. The 9/11 attack was significant enough to be the defining change of the twenty first century when it comes to global security. Terrorism violates human rights and constitutes a serious challenge for liberal democracies (Masferrer pg. 1). This subject runs a fine line between human rights and national/international laws. There were a lot of unknowns about how brutal the techniques were of the CIA. The agency also lied to the White House and congress about how intensive their techniques …show more content…

diplomats or military members.
In the torture reports the CIA admitted to using "black sites" with specific
Interrogation instruments to speed up the process of getting information.
They used a narrow windowless box where they would lock the detainee in naked for up to thirty-six hours at a time. Another tool that was used is a wooden board which the detainee would be strapped to and the interrogators would proceed to water board them.
Waterboarding is a form of water torture which water is poured over a cloth covering the face and breathing passages of a restrained captive that causes the individual to experience the sensation of drowning. There is evidence that supports that as many as 54 countries have taken part in America’s CIA torture program. Poland allowed the CIA to build a secret prison in their territory. Australia was involved with an incident of two citizens by the names of Mamdouh Habib. Australian officials interrogated Habib after they captures him in Pakistan in 2001. Habib was then transferred to Egypt where he was tortured. Egypt is known to have limited human rights law, which makes it easier to torture people. Shortly after he was sent off to Guantanamo Bay, he then was sent back to Australia without any charges against him in 2005. Habib attempted to sue the Australian government, but the case was dropped when Habib was paid an undisclosed amount of money to drop the case. A few key things that were mismanaged and lacked oversight for

Get Access