Terrorist Attacks On The World Trade Center Towers And Pentagon

Additionally, she also uses compelling anecdotal evidence to support her argument that the brain of a rational person forms these conspiracy theories as it is a human tendency to latch onto interpretation of facts as they become available. The writer also uses scientific terms like amygdala and theories such as ‘confirmation bias and the ‘backfire effect’ to persuade the readers that conspiracy theories are formed by rational people due to psychological reasons.

On May 19, 2009, Jesse Ventura was a guest on Fox and Friends and was involved in a heated discussion will co-host Brian Kilmeade about the unanswered questions surrounding the terrorist attacks that took place on 9/11. The former Minnesota governor and WWE superstar had been making waves in media throughout the decade with his views and questions while promoting several books that he’s written, including Don’t Start The Revolution Without Me, as well as a television show, “Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura. Being also a retired US Naval Underwater Demolitions Team member, Jesse had been at the forefront of the slew of questions that many have had about the accuracy of the reports on the 9/11 attacks as well as the true motives for America going to war in Iraq as a result of these attacks. Between April and May 2008, during one of several radio interviews he did, many journalism and news outlets credit him on being the first person to ascertain that the World Trade Center was demolished by explosives (AP).

On September 11, 2001 four passenger commercial jet airliners were hijacked and as a result approximately 3,000 human lives were lost. When asked about 9/11, many can recall exactly what they were doing when they heard the news that a plane crashed into one of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings and many Americans can tell you how it all unfolded and the reason behind such a travesty. The “official story” provided by officials, and restated by Sofia Shafquat, producer of “9/11 Mysteries: Demolitions” say that “four passenger planes were hijacked and taken radically off course, within an hour, two of the planes had flown into the enormous steel towers of the World Trade Center, creating fires and eventually toppling them” (Shafquat).

Introduction Mcdowell writes, “Scott says, ‘The building performance on 9/11 matched controlled demolition. It does not match fire-induced collapse. We have the expertise to discern this. Do we have the courage to broadcast it?’”

The eleventh of september 2001 is a date that american citizens will never forget. On this day a horrific event that affected the lives of many, if not all, united states citizens resulting in about 3,000 deaths and numerous injuries took place. After the devastating attacks on this nation, people 's cry for truth and justice was heard loud and clear by the president of that time. Yet in response he perceived destroying valuable evidence as giving the truth, plus, a devastating-pointless war with Iraq as Justice. These are just a few things president George Bush did to hide the fabrications in his story about the air attacks on the tallest buildings in the world. However, as we find out more about that day, and uncover more of his lies, we can only draw one conclusion. Americas very own forty-third president, George W Bush is responsible for the multiple attacks on september eleventh.

There are many questions to be answered, and the first one I want to answer is how did the jet fuel melt the steel beams in the towers. Another question, is there is video footage of the towers blowing up before the plane hit. I would like to discover if that video is edited or actual footage. Next topic I want to cover is how exactly did the black box, which is meant to survive a crash, get destroyed, yet the terrorist passports survived the crash, including the terrorist who was in the cockpit. Also, the argument that Bush did 9/11 for an excuse to invade Iran, will be valid in my paper. Lastly, I will discuss how Bin Laden denied that he did 9/11, when his previous attacks prove he enjoys to boast about them. So would one not think he would brag about planning the biggest attack on U.S. soil? Despite many discussions that will come up in my paper, there will be sub categories in each discussion, with evidence to prove them all.

This has led conspiracist to think that the initial story of 9/11 is nothing but a theory to cover the government's actions. Leading the public to believe that hijackers took control and crashed planes into three buildings. “...carefully collected and analyzed evidence” proves the crash

The claims that are presented in this report may very well be the Haunting pieces of puzzle that shake millions of patriotic Americans down to their very roots. This is information that has been overlooked and tucked away into the deep corners of the American Pride that resides in the hearts of millions of Americans. There is multitudes of evidence that contradict the credibility of the 9/11 Official Commission Report. There are significant gaps within the Commission Report, which contradict the FACTUAL events that took place on the day of September 11th, 2001. Please be advised that the information that you are going to view is very significant. I offer no conclusions, I only wish to present this information, and let the reader draw

The September 11 attacks were tragic events that had spread shockwaves of horror and grief across the United States. The tragedy became the subject of controversy as some skeptics began to doubt the details reported to have transpired that day. Some people question its legitimacy, theorizing that the Bush administration devised and orchestrated the attacks to further its agenda. Filmmaker Dylan Avery discusses and promotes this prevalent conspiracy theory in his documentary, Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup. Avery argues that the government possessed foreknowledge of the attacks by comparing them to precedents of similar situations. He challenges the official explanations and provides his analyzations of evidence from the reports and media. Avery effectively appeals to pathos, ethos, and logos in his film, but his compelling argument is ultimately undermined by fallacies.

Thanks to the internet and many programmes broadcasted all over the television, the conspiracy theories spiralling the events of 9/11 have capped that of the JFK assassination. Despite continuous complaints of the 9/11 attack being planned, several official and unofficial investigations into the horrific collapse of the Twin Towers continued, to grow in strength. A large group of people – referred to as the 9/11 Truth Movement – cite evidence than an aircraft did not hit the walls of the twin towers, and that even if the airliner had, neither of the towers could have been bought down by the impact of an aircraft alone. The group points towards video evidenced of the attack, which they claim shows smoke pouring out of the building way below the impact point of the aircraft, prior to the plane even, hitting the

A YouTube user who was tired of seeing posts about a 9/11 conspiracy theory all over the internet, decided to post a video of himself proving the theory wrong. The man states in the beginning of the video that its purpose is to try to put this "moronic" theory to rest once and for all. He says that on his Facebook feed, he repeatedly sees people claiming that, since jet fuel only burns at 1500 degrees and steel melts at 2700 degrees, the 9/11 terrorist attacks must have been a conspiracy.

In the expository documentary, Loose Change, director, Dylan Avery, challenges the master narrative dealing with the events that lead to, and occured on September 11, 2001. Throughout the film, he provides a multitude of theories that may better explain the pending questions about 9/11. But on a more broader sense, this documentary is a call to action for the american people to just simply, ask questions. Avery’s search for the truth, surfaced many inquiries that most U.S. citizens did not even know existed. Some may argue that this film is a false belief and an unpatriotic representation of America, and as we all have a right to our opinions, we must all recognize that these horrific events happened, and Avery’s assessment on how and why this

In his article, “9/11: The Greatest Lie Ever Told,” Matt Everett raises the question of whether the Twin Towers, along with WTC 7, were brought down by pre-planted explosives (141). To support the claim that the attacks on September 11th must have been an “inside job,” the presence of highly explosive material were found at the sites. Upon reading this article and other material regarding this same argument, I completely agree that the towers were brought down with explosives. The fact that the towers’ collapse resembled the characteristics of a controlled demolition and that no high-rise steel frame building had ever collapsed solely due to a fire, are reason enough to be suspect. Throughout his article, Everett produces a valid argument given the substantial amount of evidence he presents.

Tony Rooke, a man who refused to pay his bill to the BBC because he believes they have covered facts and destroyed the original footage of the 9/11 attacks. The original footage has miraculously disappeared and the BBC have blamed it on a ‘cockup’. Tony has exposed it all, with lots of evidence and scientific experiments done to prove that a plane couldn’t have destroyed 2 entire buildings, it is evident that the US government have lied to us. I found out that once the explosion and fire had calmed down, there was no trace of any desks chairs or even a pen, a jet engine plus oil couldn’t have had THAT much of an effect where not even a trace of a pen was found. This had to be a timed explosion and a certain chemical reaction to destroy to that extent. I also believe the explosion was exaggerated purposely to destroy any trace that gave away the true answer or even evidence towards it. How much of this do you believe compared to what the news claim is the ‘truth’?

Detective Finch, the detective working the V case to track him down before the revolutionary date, has a discussion with his partner after unearthing facts about the government. “If your government was responsible for the deaths of almost a hundred thousand people, would you really want to know?’ This observation has striking similarity to theories voiced by a small portion of society who claim the attacks on the World Trade Center were carried out by our own government.