I consider myself a poor test taker. This is not because of anxiety or not studying all of the material, but because I find myself making wrong decisions on challenging tests. Decisions such as leaving a question blank when short on time or second guessing myself to the wrong answer have resulted in me scoring lower on a test. I recognize my testing mistakes and I have greatly improved over the years. The problem with the tests that I have taken is that I was never taught how to effectively take exams. I have taught myself how to take tests for the most part (aside from the basic skills such as skim through the test packet when starting, and skip a question and come back to it later if it is difficult). Despite not being a great test taker, …show more content…
The first exam experience that came to mind when I thought about my tests is the SAT. The SAT is one of my worst testing experiences. I took the SAT twice. After my first time taking it, I took a brief summer SAT preparation course to help propel my SAT score. After taking the exam again, I received the exact same score, although the individual math and writing scores fluctuated from before. The SAT was a headache to me. The test took approximately five hours including the short breaks, which was mentally draining for me. I thought that overall the questions were not too challenging, and the SAT identified me as an above average student for each section. It showed that I was able to reciprocate the knowledge passed down by my teachers, but it did not truly test to see if I were a creative thinker or problem solver (which I think colleges and jobs value more). Incorporating questions similar to PISA would improve, in my opinion, the structure of the …show more content…
First, my longer exams tend to be my worst exams. It is strenuous to sit down for an extended period of time to devote all my energy and concentration on an exam. Another factor is the type of questions used on the exam. The SAT is primarily multiple choices, and the calculus exam was composed mostly of long problems. My better test was one that had a mixture of several question types and covered the material in conceptual and applied ways. Lastly, all tests were challenging, but my chemistry professor found the right balance of complexity in the problems. Overall, I believe that many students struggle with school partially because of their testing experience. Learning the curriculum and having good testing experiences has an effect on students becoming lifelong
Such pressure on students does not help them to become quick learners, or more adaptable, but instead it makes them confront the feeling of failure, which is uncalled for. Since the tests are also sought as a measure of a teacher’s performance, they also stress out teachers, even though the scores students get change based on what test they are taking which makes it difficult to judge a teacher. Standardized tests are also known to give younger students tons on stress in the form anxiety which can affect the brightest of students in such a strong manner that the Stanford-9 Exam has instructions on what to do if the student vomits on their test booklet. This clearly isn’t a sign that students enjoy and/or appreciate the
I don’t eat right and don’t concentrate well. I know staying up is not healthy and is not good for test taking. Around the time it comes to a test I stay up and cram and I’m so tired I might just put down anything and not care if the answer is right or wrong. Not eating right can also hurt your chances to pass a test. With me I would be thinking about food rather than the actual test. Even though I would know about a test in advance, I would not study until the night before. Sometime it worked but mostly it didn’t. Basically it was like trying to beat the system and you know you can’t do that. Cheating is not an option because it’s morally wrong. I would not get anything out of it. I also wouldn’t like the consequence’s. For multiple choice, true/false, and short answer test’s some hints could be to actually study and review your notes. Make sure you’re healthy and not stressed. Another thing I could do is eat right and not
These tests tend to cause the student’s too much stress and puts pressure on them to obtain a certain score on these test that are required on a yearly basis. Teachers also set aside too much time to teach strategies for taking the test and lecturing on how to eliminate some choices. According to Kathy Frandle this is “A huge waste of instruction time” (Fridy). Furthermore, the unneeded stress generally leads to a state of anxiety and it is “setting too many of them up for devastating failure and, consequently, lowered self esteem (Perrone).
In my opinion, I mostly do bad on standardized tests because I either can not concentrate or I either do not get it. Sometimes the questions or problems can be also very confusing. I consider myself a bad test taker. I consider myself a bad test taker because when I find myself confused or not getting the problem or question I just make up what ever so I can move on to the next question/problem and not feel stressed anymore. I honestly have always been a bad test taker but not always. For example, on some tests I do very well but on other test I do very poorly. I do not really prepare myself for standardized tests because I either feel like I know it already or I get lazy. Sometimes its either because I know that I am going to do poorly on
Many know the stressful feeling of having to take the ACT. The exam room fills slowly with worried faces and remains quiet until the test stars. Students grasp their pencils tightly, their palms sweating with the thought of their future at stake with this single test. In order to get into any college, an ACT or SAT score is required. These required scores for admission vary from school to school which can make it difficult for every student to attend their dream school. A single test will determine who can and cannot attend a certain college. With this system, it can deny students with potential in certain fields a place in a college because they might not test well. College admission should not be based on
Our school system has taught us that we should be good at test taking, answering multiple questions, and how to write essays. For a lot of students during their high school career SAT or ACT was a really important part in their life. Many students rely on their test scores
Preparation for these tests takes an excessive amount time away from classroom instruction. An article from the New York Times, states “…do little more than to measure rote learning”. Meaning teachers’ main goal sadly no longer for students to grasp the actual class material, as long they can teach them how to take the test and they’ll be fine, not leaving them with any long-term benefits learning wise. As shown, standardized tests produce little to no long term help for students, students practice for the test a couple weeks before, take the test, and no valuable information is retained except for the skill of test
The test taking tutorial taught me different strategies for different types of test. For multiple choice test I have learned to eliminate options that are unrelated to the question. I learned to do that because I would sometimes just pick what sounded good and not really read the rest of the choices available. I also had a problem with essay test. One strategy I would use that is to check my answer for grammar, spelling, and completion. I used to not do that because I felt rushed, but when I would get my test back it would be all marked up with corrections that needed to be made, resulting in a bad grade. On matching test I learned to single out the correct answers by going down the left column and figuring out the questions that I knew and leaving the ones that I wasn’t to sure on, and that would make It easier to single out the right answers.
These formal exams test both what has learned and what the teacher has taught. Unfortunately, they accomplish neither. A well known fact about standardized tests is that a typical student can take the same test twice and, each time, and receive different scores. This past year, In fact, I found myself taking the ACT test 3 times before I got a score I was satisfied with. However, the accuracy of such a test is questionable. Additionally, if you were to look on the shelves of a library, you will find a selection of books on preparation for each different standardized tests including ACT, SAT, AP Testing, GED to name a few. The point of each of these being how to prepare yourself. Logically, the best way to prepare for a test should be to study the included material. However, this idea no longer applies. Success on standardized tests involves students practicing ways to control their abundant stress and utilize their short given amount of time for every section or helpful tactics for memorization. Performance on the tests depends less and less on an existing knowledge than it does on an ability to beat the system. The anxiety, distraction, and emotional distress play a great number into a student’s ability to perform well as he or she sits to complete the test. Under this unhealthy pressure, the odds are completely against them. In spite of promising intellect and determination, the most efficient learner can fail. Then how can standardized test actually measure what a student knows or doesn’t
The author Joelle Charbonneau wrote the book The Testing. An amusing fact about Joelle is that she taught many students how to sing. In an article Joelle states “My students are a wonderful source of inspiration and continue to teach me life while I teach them about singing” (Charbonneau… New York Times). The Testing by Joelle Charbonneau is about a girl named Cia who is selected to go through a testing program to test her knowledge and see if she can attend a certain college. Cia has many roadblocks, but that does not stop her from doing her best. People should recommend this book because of its connection to the article titled New Surveillance Technology. The message of this book is that knowledge is power, so don’t betray it.
This situation does not set students up for success. There is also the problem of “…overemphasis on standardized testing (that) has ‘caused considerable collateral damage in too many schools, including narrowing the curriculum, teaching to the test, reducing love of learning, pushing students out of school, driving excellent teachers out of the profession and undermining school climate’” (Parents4PublicSchool 1). When schools, students, and teachers focus so much on standardized tests that it reduces the love of learning, decreasing the love of learning in both teachers and in the students. When a student is forced to learn inside of the box and do not have the freedom to add extra tidbits of fun, it reduces the love of learning. When the curriculum is narrowed, a teacher does not have as much room to add in things that will increase the love of learning in students, either. Because of all of these things, a student will not be as ready for college because instead of being prepped for things that would be necessary in college, they are being taught everything aimed at the test just so that they can get into a college. Even if a student does well on the test, there is always the chance of not doing well once in college. The test was not made to be used to figure out college readiness, it was meant to be used as an
All of these test are wearing the students down they are not learning from taking a test there is just to much time spent on testing.With less test we as kids will learn more about the subject they struggle with, and those are just some of the reasons why we need to get rid of some test. If we can reduce the number of test we will still learn but easier.It will be way more simple and we will still be learning the same amount maybe even more. It cant really hurt to try can it?
Students are stressed. But, what is the goal of these tests? Are we trying to make students compete with one another to see who gets the higher score? Or are we preparing them for life outside of school? Maybe at one time these tests were used to measure how well the future leaders of our countries were learning, but now it is no longer like that. These tests seem to show no post-school value except to find the most successful kids and give them scholarships to college. Going along with this, everyone, depending on their grade, is required to take the same exact test. Despite their different ways of thinking, students are grouped together and the ones who are different are “wrong” simply because they were unable to learn it due to the way they were taught. Holding every single student to the same standards avoids the fact that everyone has a different mindset and each person may excel in different subjects. This poses a question: when will the system change? Students are held to such enormous pressure that when they meet the standards, they are convinced they’re stupid, and I struggle with this, too. However, it would be easier if all of the intimidation encountered when we are testing would just be withdrawn and students can be able to take a test, try their best, and if they don’t succeed, they can continue to work hard because, after all, a test shouldn’t determine how
When students think about tests, their thoughts tend to move more towards the idea of “how am I going to memorize all of this in one week,” I know this from experience. Why is this the way that students treat such “important” tests? I ask myself that question just about every time I think about taking an end of course test, SAT, ACT, or anything like that. All across the nation, students have also been introduced to a thing called common core, which has, for some reason, been made even more difficult than the previous set standards. This seems to be no solution to the problem, but will more than likely only worsen the ditch that we have gotten ourselves into, in terms of education. Before focusing on making school more challenging for students and teachers, would not it make more sense for the problem of students not actually learning the content of the course to be fixed first? With more challenging tests, comes more confused students who are willing to do anything just to pass; including flushing their education down the toilet. They do this by only storing the information in their short-term memory rather than actually learning the content of the class, but it’s not always their faults, either. The way the school system is set up, students are not taught how to actually learn the material or use it in real life. A student’s only goal is making good grades on the tests and surviving the class. This memorizing business can hurt students later on in life, as well. These kids get used to taking the easy way out, and will never learn the “deeper-thinking skills” that they need to succeed in the world today. “The focus on memorization, fueled by standardized testing, has obstructed learning, according to Linda Darling-Hammond of Stanford University, who argues that students have been losing or squandering most of the information they acquire in school.” (Towler.) Even a
According to Turgut, educational tests have improved in its validity and reliability since the initial introduction of standardized tests (65). Parents and educators who have experienced tests and quizzes every class time believe that if given more exams, students would have to