The 2nd Amendment : An Analysis Of The Second Amendment

Gun control in America is one of the most fiercely debated topics in today’s political sphere. Nearly everyone has an opinion and there is a mind-boggling amount of information typically discussed regarding the matter. Media hot takes and campaign talking points aside, far too many lives have been lost to gun violence. A total of 12,902 in 2016, to be exact. The fact that more lives have been lost to gun violence in the United States this year than the 5,000 lost in the almost 10-year war effort overseas in Iraq and Afghanistan is appalling. Is sensible and reasonable gun control progress attainable in our near future? That remains to be seen, however it is my intention to respectfully dissect an argument presented by none other than an essay

“A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” - Second Amendment. Throughout history, this sentence of twenty seven words has caused an intense debate. The polemic is that some people claim that a gun control policy is unconstitutional, while others disagree and even say it is necessary in order to reduce crime. Now, what does gun control mean? If it means to analyze who is responsible enough to own a gun by a “Universal Background Check”; that sounds right to everyone. But in the article “What Are Obama’s Gun Control Proposals? An Easy Guide” published in the National Journal by Matt Vasilogambros. The author states that the “gun-control

The Second Amendment is a part of the Bill of Rights, (the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution) the framework to elucidate upon the freedoms of the individual. The Bill of Rights was planned and sent to the states, and were later ratified on December 15, 1791.The first 10 Amendments to the United States Constitution were introduced by James Madison as a series of legislative articles and came into effect as Constitutional Amendments following the process of ratification (three-fourths of the States) on December 15, 1791.

In 1789, the Congress created the Bill of Rights to make sure the people are protected and the government has limitations. The Third Amendment states, “No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.” (“Bill of Rights”). Throughout the years the amendments have been manipulated, in a way, to be used in a certain way. In researching the Third Amendment, one will find the past and present of the Quartering of Soldiers through the origins of the law, modern application of the amendment, and its current effectiveness.

The third amendment is the right to refuse housing to a soldier which protects your privacy in the home. It was created due to the resentment of

How can the original writing and intent of the second amendment, be relevant in our society today?

On December 15, 1791, the Bill of Rights was ratified effective by Congress. These first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America promised the states certain rights and freedoms which could not be infringed by the government. After all, the founding fathers knew from experience that men in their weakness were often tempted by power. They had become all too familiar with this when under the control of King George in England. Therefore, in order to protect the future people of their beautiful country, they promised certain liberties which could not be taken away. Every single one of these freedoms is important for the United States of America. However, the second amendment is especially important

The Bill of Rights was ratified in in 1791, eight years after the revolutionary war. During war times British soldiers were finding room and board in private civilian homes without owner consent. The English quartering act inspired the third amendment which states “no soldier shall in times of peace be quartered in any house without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner prescribed by law” (94). The last war fought on American soil was the civil war, which ended 1865, which is now 150 years into the past. Today the third amendment is irrelevant. There may be need for the third amendment in the future but currently this (quartering of soldiers) is not a problem we are facing today.

Most people would link violence and crime problems with gun control in America. The debate that Americans face today is the freedom the Second Amendment gives citizens and whether or not the country should repeal it. While some people feel that repealing it should solve the problem, others believe that it is one of the most important basic freedoms we have as Americans. Federal gun control laws are unconstitutional, and I believe the Second Amendment is both an individual and state right.

The first amendment is one of the most used amendments today. Everyone in the world uses it and sometimes takes advantage of it and most times uses it when needed to. The Bill Of Rights was created on December 15th of 1779 and was created to make some rules in the future because no one had the freedom to do anything. Most were punished if they spoke their opinion, they did not even have the right to choose their own religion. But that all changed when James Madison wrote the Bill of Rights which is our first ten amendments. The First Amendment is and always will be the most used amendment today.

This law prohibited any speech that interfered with the drafting of men into the armed forces. The media is forced to silence, due to the fear of any repercussions, from the government. Merely voicing an opinion in the media about any war is now so looked down upon that it takes away freedom from the media to reach all types of audiences.

The militia and the government both has a tendency to use more power than what they have, maybe sometimes forgetting the rights of citizens. At the time of the uprising of the Revolutionary War in 1775, the British parliament passed acts such as the Quartering Act and the Intolerable Act. The Third Amendment was introduced by James Madison for he had made it himself. The congress passed the Third Amendment on September 5, 1789. By December 15, 1791, three fourth of the states ratified the Third Amendment. It was put on the Bill of Rights the in the year of 1791. In 1792 Thomas Jefferson announces the adoption of the Third Amendment. In the Bill of Rights, it is clearly written, “No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.” The Third Amendment mean that no soldier shall just go into a house without asking for permission by the owner of the property. The third amendment is most important because it shows military and citizens rights, keeps owner’s privacy, and pushes soldiers to help in the war.

No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. This amendment says that the law, military or a soldier can't force a citizen to house a soldier.

According to the textbook, Constitutional Law and the Criminal Justice System by J. Scott Harr, Karen M. Hess, Christine Orthmann, and Jonathon Kingsbury, the purpose behind establishing the second amendment was that the United States, (U.S.) did not have the resources to conduct a permanent army (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 168). Due to the fact that the colonies remained solitary, they needed to find a way to defend themselves. As a result, the newly formed country brought into existence a state militia army (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 168). Throughout the years, the second amendment has been categorized into two divergent forms of rights, the individual rights and the state’s rights. To better explain, a great many people see that the seconded amendment is up for elucidation with regards to the individual’s rights ‘to keep and bear arms’ (Cornell University Law School, n.d.).

However, according to Clayton Cramer, an author and software engineer, and David Kopel, research director for the Independence Institute, research shows that this is not the case. A study done by the Dade County police in Miami over a period of six years, examined 21,000 permit holders. In this time frame, only one incident occurred in which the victim had his weapon taken from him. Also, there were no innocent bystanders killed by the permit holders in this study (29). The problem with gun opponents is that they do not interpret the Second Amendment correctly. The word “people” in the Second Amendment clearly means individuals citizens. Barton believes that in order to fully understand the original intent of the writers of the Second Amendment