The 5 Communication Styles Based On The Lecture Material

There are five conflict-handling styles: Forcing Style, Collaborating Style, Compromising Style, Avoiding Style and Accommodating Style. The compromising style “refers to behaviors at an intermediate level of cooperation and assertiveness. (Hellriegel, Slocum pg. 392) ” The person using is style tries to meet a goal by give-and-take. The accommodating style “refers to cooperative and unassertive behavior. (Hellriegel, Slocum pg. 393) ” The person using this style tries to accomplish a goal by using unselfish acts that will promote cooperation in others by complying with their wishes. The collaborating style “refers to high levels of cooperative and assertive behavior. (Hellriegel, Slocum pg. 391) ” The person using this style is using a win-win approach to working with others and handling conflict. When the CEO of General Hospital, Mike Hammer first attempted to control physician-driven cost he used the collaborating style by trying to convince the Director of

I understand the effectiveness of each of these styles of communication and I feel a large part of it depends on the situation at hand as well. Personally, I feel that if someone is constantly communicating aggressively, or constantly communicating passively, it no longer becomes effective. However, in certain situations and on occasion certain communication styles are very effective. For instance, I find that passive communication styles work extremely well with more attention seeking students who might feel belittled by more aggressive communication. Passive communication can make a person more willing to listen and cooperate. However, aggressive communication can be very effective in certain situations as well. Personally, if I am working

Which conflict style do you think best describes you? Are there any potential problems that could arise from using this particular style?

This approach to conflict is an example of competing because of the win-lose outcome of the conflict. Jury member number three makes sure that he uses his alpha male status and shuts down jury member number two without any complaint.

In this report I will talk about four different ways of communicating, the four different communication styles are written communication, non verbal, verbal and computerized. Communication is something that everyone does without even thinking. Communication is giving information either verbally or written and the person receiving and obtaining the information. This process is an ongoing process such as one person may say something and in turn you may say something. Now you both have gain new information. This can happen in the simplest conversations such as ‘How

The best outcome for you is likely to involve some compromise (It is unlikely to be your ‘perfect’ outcome).

A person with the steadiness style is a supporting individual with magnificent listening abilities. Individuals have a tendency to float towards his identity and appreciate being in his presence. He will advantage the group by obliging the status of quo, as he is awesome at looking after self-restraint. He is hesitant to change, dislikes taking risky initiatives, and will oblige others regardless of the fact that he doesn't agree along, to keep up steadiness and balance. The drawback is that he may get to be overpowered and bothered when he can't maintain stability.

In this week, I learned that a lot of my classmates or the people that my classmates talk about in there primary task, have different communication styles. Amanda Headly mentioned a communication style that I can relate to and that is passive style. I will sometime let other people say anything to me and I don't say nothing back. Sometime I feel the things that they say to be disrespectful or hart my feelings do not need a response back, so I just go on about my day. In Rosemary Arline primary task, she mentioned different communication as well and the one that I can relate to is assertive style. When I have something very important or a sensitive matter to discuss, I rather discuss it face to face to that individual. Sarah Tucker comment on

If a basketball team as a practice in the gym, and then wrestling has practice in that gym at the same time because of a mistake by the administration. Then a compromise must be met to let them have practice. THere are hundreds of ways this compromise can be outputted with either the wrestlers happy or unhappy, or basketball players happy or unhappy. Either sports could be greaty and claim the gym theirs, and say the other team must leave. They could come decide to compromise and share the gym, or decide something totally different. This is an example of what people find compromising a bad thing now because of the fear of the decision coming with the compromise. People would rather go the for sure way, and get what they want, so then they don’t have to give up not even a little of what they want, making compromising something

As a part of my assignment to identify the styles and different skills of communication by studying Brian Krzanich actions and behaviour. Next part is to perform a critical analysis on the identified communication styles and skills by comparing and contrasting strength, weakness of a selected person.

Conflict is “an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, scarce resources, and interference from others in achieving their goals” (Hocker, 1991). There are two basic types of conflicts: substantive and emotional. According to Schermerhorn et.al., substantive conflict is a fundamental disagreement over ends or goals to be pursued and the means for their

Edmonson, J. (2009). Let's be clear: How to manage communication styles. T & D, 63(9), 30-31.

Compromising can only be bad if it harms others. When we compromise to get along with others, like our family or a friend, then that would be a good time to compromise. When we were painting our home my husband and I would have to compromise in choosing a color or the room would stay the same for years. The definition of compromise is an agreement or a settlement of the dispute that is reached by each side in making concessions. “an ability to listen to two sides in a dispute, and devise a compromise acceptable to both.” So to me it is a good thing because two side meet somewhere in the middle. Therefore, if a person wants you to compromise on everything and you’re not comfortable with it, then that is a signal that it would be best not

Two of the most prevalent forms of communication styles are direct and indirect communication; these two communication styles impact how members of a culture interact with each other (Morreale & Pearson, 2008). According to Craddock (2002), Kierkegaard, regarded direct communication, “as the mode for transferring information and considered it totally appropriate to the fields of history, science, and related disciplines” (p. 70). Direct communication can be defined as, “speech that specifically states and directs an action. When someone hears direct speech, they know immediately what needs to be done. There is no question about who is in charge, and usually no need for discussion” (Gaddis, 2006, p. 11). On the other hand, Kiergaard believed that, “the indirect was the mode for eliciting capability and action from within the listener, a transaction that did not occur by giving the hearer some information” (Craddock, 2002, p. 70). Unlike direct communication, “a indirect style of speech is not typically authoritative, rather it encourages input from the listener” (Gaddis, 2006, p. 11). The direct and indirect communication styles are often used in different fields, disciplines, and industries ranging from education, workplace, literature, and entertainment, to church services (Morreale & Pearson, 2008). For example, the population relies on the news media as the main source of information and the basis on which they form their opinions and voting decisions” (Fog, 1999, p.

The competitive approach is based on a win-lose system. This typically occurs when both parties do not share a common interest or goal. This style of negotiation often invites dishonesty, and in most cases only one side tends to benefit from the decision. In competitive negotiation, parties are not always forthcoming with information; the negotiator will give just enough information to make the other party accept the proposal. This type of negotiation can be seen in a divorce hearing, for ex. When it comes to the custody of the children, there can only be one primary parent, the other parent has to settle with scheduled time to visit the children, as a result of the children not being in their primary care, they also have to pay child support to help the primary parent. All of this applies, because they were not awarded primary care of the children. One thing is for sure in the competitive negotiation there will always be a loss.