Australia’s government is a federal system that contains different ‘levels’ consisted of Federal, State and Local government that work together to govern the nation (Andrewrobb, 2015). The system is very difficult to understand, thus gathering low attention by the public. For those who are observes how the government works can attain a sense of understanding how the system affects the lives of many people in the nation. Throughout the Abbott government period, it had proposed several plans that would not only provide benefits to the people of Australia, but also the nation itself. Although, the Abbott government came to an abrupt end after a near two-year term, it has achieved several achievements throughout its duration. However, the criticisms …show more content…
On the other hand, many people have debated that the achievements by the Abbott government were lackluster, provided no structural change and did not equal to the amount of promises broken. The essay will discuss both sides of the argument presented and will be looked upon in detail before a conclusion is found.
During Tony Abbott’s election campaign, he had proposed a major policy regarding refugees and the safety of Australia’s borders. The policy dubbed as Operational Sovereign Borders (OSB) began after Tony Abbott became the Prime Minister of Australia. Being led by the Australian Defense Force, Operational Sovereign Borders were supported by various federal government agencies (McAdam, 2013). The implementation of Operational Sovereign Borders would result in boats containing refugees from foreign countries to be intercepted and be sent back to where it originated. The purpose for the implementation of the policy was to keep Australia’s borders safe from potential harm. Though, after numerous encounters with refugees, the policy was deemed successful, becoming one of the most important
…show more content…
The purpose for the implementation of the carbon was to make polluters of carbon to pay accordingly to the amount of carbon they release in the atmosphere (Pazzano, 2012). However, it has affected families and unemployed people around Australia, as costs in household such as electricity and gas increased due to the policy (Robson, 2014). It was until July 2014, when Tony Abbott abolished the policy after several failed attempts, fulfilling its promise and becoming one of the best achievements the government has made. According to Griffiths (2014), the removal of the carbon tax will benefit the majority of households in Australia, saving hundreds of dollars in electricity and gas costs. However, Abbott’s promise has been condemned as only having a minor effect on household emission costs. This is evident in Thals’ (2015) article that Tony Abbott’s guarantee on lower household costs after the carbon tax repeal was an ambitious promise, as expectation the government had set out were not reached. But, Thals clarified that the Abbott government still fulfilled its promise, lessening the cost on household emissions (Thals, 2015). After the carbon tax repeal, Tony Abbott had announced a new climate change policy to replaced the carbon tax policy (Chang, 2014). The Direct Action policy by Tony Abbott is a carbon reduction
Gough Whitlam remains one of Australia’s few leaders who can be truly said to have changed Australia, even for the brief period of his time in government. Elected on December 5th 1972 his government brought upon a vast range of reforms in the 1071 days it held office (Thompson, 2014). Within the first year alone, Labor passed 203 bills, which is the most bills passed than any other federal government had passed in a single year (Betts, 2015). The three bills that will be presented through this essay are the Education system, with what it was like before and after the Whitlam Government came into power, what Health care was like before and after the Whitlam Government and what the Indigenous Australians went through before and after the Whitlam Government.
As the Prime Minister of Australia, it is my duty to present my democratic nation with their elected desires. The current issue is concerning the movement of Australia’s governing system from a constitutional monarchy to a republic. I believe that Australia should become a republic, as our sunburnt country has overtime developed culturally and democratically since 1901 when we become the Commonwealth of Australia, and started living under the ruling of Queen Elizabeth the Second. We have created a place that is in no way similar to the British Empire. As Australians we respect and acknowledge the traditional owners of our land, the Aborigines. Over time, it seems as though we have taken this country out of their hands and handed it to the
The Eureka stockade was a turning point for Australian democracy. It was a rebellion against the police and government and it was a fight for justice. The Eureka stockade is seen by some to be the birthplace of Australian democracy (Evatt, 2010). It was destined to fail, yet it is probably the most widely known rebellion in Australian History. The Rebellion against authority started with unfair taxes and policing, and it resulted in a change in the political stance of people in the middle and lower classes. It is an important part of the development of Australia as a nation, as it demonstrates the values of mateship, determination, persistence and the Aussie ‘Give-it-a-go’ attitude, all of which are key parts of the Australian Identity and culture.
Ms. Gillard and Mr. Abbott are both former prime ministers of Australia. However, both of them have different strategies and methods beginning with moving Australia in the right direction. Even though, they both served at different times, nevertheless, they expressed their opinion openly about the job they were doing, Ms. Gillard served as prime minister before Mr. Abbott, laying a solid foundation for Australia. She initiated policies and procedures to help Australia become a better place to live. Although, Australia suffered an economic crisis while Ms. Gillard was in office, she made Australia a better place. Following, Ms. Gillard, Mr. Abbott became prime minister. He made changes by implementing new laws. Ms. Gillard and Mr. Abbott both have different views on same sex marriages, education, and Medicare.
But according to Australian Story’s documentary, The Making of Malcolm, we have hope. Our latest prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull has been showcased in this documentary, proving that not only himself but all politicians are not the mindless, idiotic zombies we perceive them to be but in fact people too, (hard to believe, huh?) evident through exhibiting the tragedy and genuine experience that Turnbull has faced through his life using effective
The mining business is where the greater part of Australia’s economy originates from. Conservative politicians are unwilling to accept climate change, for the reason that they favour society’s values and aspects to be unchanged. A case which supports this notion is Australia’s and the United States rejecting to join other countries in partaking in the Kyoto Protocol. The Kyoto Protocol aims to unite countries to set limits on their greenhouse gas emissions, to suppress the destructive effects of climate change. The United States expresses that it will not participate in the international treaty due to; absence of sufficient supporting scientific evidence, large developing countries such as China or India aren’t partaking in the movement and reducing the greenhouse emissions would mean loss in their economy. Therefore, Australia and the United States will be more reluctant to adapting accepting climate change as it will negatively affect the industries that both countries originated from and have thrived on (Vanderheiden,
Australia’s carbon tax led to a drop in electricity sector emissions by as much as 17 million tons (9%). Many contend that the effects would have been more
Abbott stopping the boats stopped people smugglers from making money by putting people in dangerous situations
In 2012 the Australian government announced a price on carbon, in the form of a carbon tax. The tax began at a fixed price of $23 per tonne of CO2. The labour
Although the Abbott’s government has an intention to subdue regulatory constraints on businesses by repealing the carbon tax, recently the senate has voted to block carbon tax repeal legislation which was convicted as ineffectiveness and high costing (Griffiths 2014). As a result, the carbon tax remains relatively high at a price of $24.15 per tone of CO2e Rio (Tinto Coal Australia 2011) which cost Rio Tinto $36.3 million in the last fiscal (Rio Tinto Coal Australia 2013), representing a “big government” trait. Attributing to the
For the past 7, weeks Australians have been bombarded with one of the longest political campaigns in the history of this country. As the campaign progressed we saw both Malcolm Turnbull travelling around the Australia promising a lot of money to many projects: on the condition that the state government would have to pay up to half the cost to fund the projects. Sean
Australia’s oldest political party is the Australian Labor Party (ALP). Their history associates with the history of Australia’s democracy and labor movement. The largest trade boom in the history of the period of economic transition is Australia. The core Labor morals of opportunity and fairness. The core Labor has never been more pleased to establish the foster economic growth. The government has demolished the morals and economic growth. The Australian economy leads Labor through a time of significant global ambiguity, the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). The action Labor took with a broad-scale economic packages the economy did not stall because Australians faired exceptional than the highest in the world during the GFC. More than 200,000
In Australia, there is an emerging consensus that the government should take further actions to help mitigate and combat climate change. The current most accepted policy by government is the introduction of a carbon tax followed by an ETS in 2015. However we are focusing on the carbon tax in this essay and not the ETS. Here is a brief explanation of the dynamics of a carbon tax. A carbon tax is a tax on energy sources, which emit carbon dioxide (Co2). Therefore, carbon taxes address the problem of negative externality. Externalities are the subsequent effects when individual production or consumption of a particular good or service imposes costs or benefits on others. Therefore negative externalities are effects, which pose harm to others without their direct interaction (Basic Economics 2011). However, usual market practices and transactions do not reflect these cost and benefits in the prices involved in the transaction, or take into account in their transaction decision. Therefore this is a form of market failure. By imposing a cost on these negative externalities, the hidden cost can be addressed. Ultimately the purpose of a carbon tax is to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and therefore reduce
In February 2011, the Australian federal government declared a scheme to implement a Carbon Tax from July 1, 2012. Implementing this scheme has generated a controversial debate between Australians. The term “Carbon tax” refers to an environmental tax forcing polluters to pay per ton of carbon which they release into the atmosphere. This essay will provide the economical, social and political implication of carbon taxes, also with its introduction who will benefit and who would suffer.
However, the Gillard government has instituted one fairly radical and controversial policy: the new imposed carbon tax which took effect on July 1, 2012. The tax requires 500 of Australia's top polluting companies to "pay a fixed price, starting at Aus$23 per tonne, for their carbon dioxide emissions for the first three years. The mechanism would then shift