The Abortion Debate Essay

* Around three quarters of British people believe that you should be able to make your own decision about having an abortion

If a woman does not want any of her part to develop, she should be

Abortion is a form of murder and demeans the value of human life. When a pregnant women feels a kick in her belly, she doesn't say "Oh, the fetus kicked" or "Oh, the mass of cells that hasn't become a person kicked", she says "The baby kicked." Yes, after conception you have a real human being waiting to enter the world. Why should taking someone's life when they're in the womb be any different than taking their life when they're a baby in the crib? Pro-choice advocates claim this isn't a real baby only to justify their wrong acts in their own minds. Even if you don't believe abortion is murder, it still demeans the value of human life, since women can so callously stomp out a living being simply because they're inconvenienced.

Abortion is one of usual medical procedures performed in the U.S. each year. According from the article in emedicinehealth, more than 40% of all women will end a pregnancy by abortion at some time in their reproductive lives. In 2013, 664,435 legal induced abortions were reported to CDC from 49 reporting areas. The abortion rate for 2013 was 12.5 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years, and the abortion ratio was 200 abortions per 1,000 live births.

The subject of abortion is one of the most contentious issues in America today. Most people who oppose abortion do so for religious reasons. Their belief is that a fetus is a baby and that it is wrong to kill it. People who are for abortion argue that it should be okay to terminate a fetus because it is not a baby and has no rights. In this paper I will argue that abortion should be legal in any instance because I don’t think it’s reasonable to assign arbitrary cut-offs dates to it, simply because no one can yet prove or agree upon when a fetus becomes a fully sentient being.

Before I can expound upon my position on abortion I must first put forth the definitions of recurrent terms in my argument. For the purposes of this paper, abortion is the destruction of a fetus at any stage of development. A fetus constitutes a fertilized egg. The moment the sperm and egg converge, it becomes a life. My position on abortion states that abortion is always immoral, but is in some cases understandable. Immoral is a wrongness—something that should not be done on a principle of society. I also term some abortions as understandable, although still immoral, because there is a greater purpose behind it. I will further explain this seemingly contradictory statement later on in my argument.

The topic of abortion is one of the most controversial topics affecting our society. The disagreement between for and against abortion has caused hundreds of fights that have even resulted in death. Regardless of what many individuals may accept, fetus removal is not right or off. It is a matter of individual assessment. Consequently, each one side can say with assurance that alternate isn't right.

This scholarly peer-reviewed article by medical doctor Jane Anderson contains easily understandable information about the abortion-breast cancer link. The introduction of the article succinctly states that induced abortion (IA) prior to 32 weeks of gestation seems to increase a woman’s risk of developing breast cancer. Anderson then adds that the association between abortion and breast cancer is largely ignored by the mainstream medical community and even disputed by some. She then includes a quote by the Guttmacher institute that claims that exhaustive reviews by panels convened by both the U.S. government and British government have stated that there is no association between abortion and breast cancer. However, Anderson points out that

Abortion is one of the most controversial topics of all times. It has caused countless deaths and several violent confrontations between the two separate parties of opinion. The fight between pro-life and pro-choice supporters has been long and brutal. This is because, despite what several people may believe, abortion is neither right nor wrong. It is the matter of a personal opinion, where, each side can say with certainty that the other one is wrong.

the easy way out though. People just need to know more about it and have to

Today many people are against women having an abortion, no matter what situation they are in, the point of women having their own rights should include whether they choose to have their own kid or not. The United States today is very divided on the whole abortion issue, typically republicans are against it calling theirselves “pro-lfe” and democrats are typically for abortion and they call theirselves “pro-choice.” Abortion had been practiced in the United States ever since 1880, but it wasn 't legalized nationwide until 1973. Up until that point there were some states that had it legalized, but in the famous court case Roe vs Wade, it was finally legalized throughout all of the United States. But it is still a big issue in the United

In this day and age, choosing between what side you should support has become very difficult. Prochoice, meaning you believe it should be up to women if they keep or abort there baby and Prolife is when you think every individual, including those unborn, deserve a chance at life. The pro-life argument is not that abortion is wrong because it kills a baby, but rather, that abortion is morally wrong because it kills a human person who is not yet a baby -- a label we ordinarily assign to newborns, not preborns -- but still a fully human person (Beckwith).

In the United States of America, women have always been fighting for their rights, even recently with debates on whether or not birth control should be free to woman with certain health insurance plans. Something very important to a woman's health is abortion. Abortion is the act of ending a pregnancy before the fetus can survive outside the uterus and it has always been a raging conflict between many people, dividing the country between prolife and pro choice camps. Those who oppose abortion believe that abortions are wrong and it’s the equivalent to killing a living child outside of the uterus, almost like a murder. Those who favor pro choice believe that the pregnant woman should have a choice between keeping the baby or terminating the pregnancy for whichever reason they personally feel is acceptable. Many pro life believers back up their beliefs with religious reasoning. The 14th amendments to the United States Constitution provides equal protection for all citizens, including woman.Despite the protections under the law, there are many states that put up obstacles. there should not be due to the fact that a woman should be able to choose what goes on with her body, especially if what she’s doing doesn’t harm anyone around her.

The abortion argument is always a tough split decision. Some people lean towards pro-life and some towards pro-choice. The pro-life group believes that every fetus should be kept alive since they are a developing human, and every human has a right to life. The pro-choice believe that if it’s the woman’s body it should be her choice, especially in a case of rape. For my stance on the argument I stand with both pro-life and pro-choice due to certain arguments. These arguments came about after the Supreme Court case of Roe vs. Wade.

Aristotle held a similar view that many share today: population control and the prevention of passing along genetic mutations. Subsequently, Soranus, a Greek physician (A.D. 98-138), wrote a dissertation compiling his knowledge of gynecological and obstetrical work. He claims that contraceptives differ from abortion, “For the first does not let conception take place, while the latter destroys what has been conceived” (Soranus 62). Within, he lists numerous methods for avoiding pregnancy after intercourse, such as applying freshly ground pomegranate peel as a vaginal suppository, mixing various herbs and wines to later ingest, and even immediately squatting down and sneezing after engaging in sex; “These things not only prevent conception, but also destroy any already existing” (Soranus 65-66). Equally important is Soranus’ mention of two different views on abortion: one side opposes abortives for they believe pregnancy is natural, or fate, and should not be interfered with, while the other faction approves them, but only when they’re used to prevent the mother from dying during childbirth (63). Fast forward to 1803, Britain passed a law known as Lord Ellenborough’s Act, which prohibited abortion; this was the very first law to ban abortion. Any persons who committed the crime of having or performing an abortion would face the death penalty (Keown). Unfortunately, the reason behind the passing of this act was never clear; however, it can be assumed that the intention stems