Andrew Jackson, though frequently caricatured as a rube with an uncontrolled temper and pretensions to monarchy, was in reality an overall wise leader, a defender of freedom, and a dynamic president. Jackson showed his leadership in averting the threat of succession. He held to his belief that it was wiser for the country to remain unified and gain strength through compromise and working together than to split and have each separate part squabble for privileges and fight to get what they wanted. He showed himself ready and able to use force to keep the nation together yet willing to use diplomacy and compromise. To this end, he was able to control his emotions and work together with those he disagreed with towards a common goal of unity. Jackson
Jackson began his proclamation by outlining the reasons and reservations that led South Carolina to pass the ordinance. The major concerns for the Southerners were the tariffs. “ I, Andrew Jackson, President of the United States, have thought proper to issue this my PROCLAMATION, stating my views of the Constitution and laws applicable to the measures adopted by the Convention of South Carolina”
The Tariff of 1828 raised taxes and the Southerners did not like this at all. South Carolina threatened to leave the union if the taxes were not lowered. Calhoun wanted to nullify the taxes in South Carolina, but Jackson threatened to bring military forces to South Carolina to solve the problem.
In 2016, Donald Trump was elected for president. In 2017, Trump took office, and almost everyone was thrilled to see this man lead the United States. People wore shirts of him, hats of him, celebrities supported him widely, singers wrote songs about him, and everyone chanted his famous line, “Make American Great Again”. In 1828, a familiar man won the hearts of Americans and claimed the title as the president of the United States after the brutal defeat in the 1824 Election. Similar to Trump, Andrew Jackson was not just seen as a leader at that time, but an icon as well. People were chomping at the bit just to touch the man. The man who was well liked because of his major role in the War of 1812, the Seminole War, and his status as a war hero. Andrew Jackson and his followers created the modern Democratic Party, during his Presidency and the era from 1830 - 1850 that became known as the Jacksonian Democracy. This is hard to believe because Jackson wasn't the brightest, “Adams called him a barbarian who could not write a sentence of grammar” (Foner pg. 367). Similar to other presidents that the United States has had, Jackson made a mass amount of actions that raised some eyebrows and even chaos. These actions made by Jackson nearly destroyed the nation, especially the economic matter. Although I hold Jackson in high regard for his tremendous boldness, this trait was his hamartia, or his downfall. Because of his boldness, he was egotistical, thinking that he can just decide on
Everyone was hoping Andrew Jackson would lower tariffs once he became president. When Andrew Jackson did not address tariffs South Carolina decided to take charge. A convention place in South Carolina in 1832. It ruled that the tariffs of 1828 and and 1832 were unconstitutional and not enforceable in South Carolina after February 1, 1833. Just before this date Andrew Jackson created a force bill that allowed him to use military forces against South Carolina. He then created a new negotiated tariff for South Carolina, which was passed by congress.
President Andrew Jackson served as President of the United States from 1826 to 1837 and is looked at my many as one of the best presidents in American history. Jackson was a man without many limits and did what he wanted because he simply wanted to do it, not because it was necessarily the popular opinion or Constitutional. This caused a lot of problems, but also was very beneficial in making solutions to problems in the country. Although, as a result of this, many people saw him as a dictator-like tyrant and didn’t agree with his pandering towards the uneducated, more working class civilians during his campaign. President Jackson’s presidency was controversial as a result in debate over his political tactics as well as possibly overstepping his Constitutional boundaries when it came to the amount of power he exuded on the people; therefore, many people spoke out against his “uneducated followers” as well as his aggressive style while some evidence shows that these efforts were supported.
Andrew Jackson, seventh president of the United States of America, can be debated as either a good president or bad president. But if one were to weigh out the positives and negatives of Andrew Jackson’s presidency, one would realize that his positives outweigh his negatives for a variety of historic facts. Andrew Jackson was a good president because he represented the majority of America’s people by being a common, prevented a civil war when South Carolina threatened to secede from the nation, and because he technically found or instigated the two major parties used in America today (Democratic and Republican). Many Jackson oppositionists despise him because of he is a hypocrite, however America was founded on hypocrisy so as an
The President of the United States is one of the most powerful officials. The seventh president of the United States, Andrew Jackson, made the presidency more powerful because he represented the “common man.” Jackson grew up in the rural parts of South Carolina and when he was thirteen years old, he joined the army at during the American Revolution War. Jackson was involved in many wars and became a war hero. He fought in the American Revolution and the War of 1812. After serving at war, he would serve two terms as president from 1829-1837. Jackson is the father of the Democratic Party. Later on, people would realize that Jackson was a very controversial president. Jackson would be an inefficient and efficient president during his time in office.
Over the course of United States history, every president has changed the country in many ways. Some have changed it for the good of the country, and some have changed it for the worse. However, some have changed it in ways disputed whether they are for the betterment of this great nation. One of these many presidents in the infamous Andrew Jackson. During his time in office, he caused many changes. Some even believed that he was abusing his executive power in ways that a king might, they nicknamed him “King Andrew.”
The myth of his mediocrity sprouted mostly from a series of misfortunes over which he had no control. From the outset the new president labored under severe handicaps. As a machine made candidate, he incurred the resentment of many Democrats— those who objected to having a “bastard politician’’ smuggled into office beneath the tails of the old general’s military coat. Jackson, the master showman, had been a dynamic type of executive whose administration had resounded with furious quarrels and cracked heads. Mild-mannered Martin Van Buren seemed to rattle about in the military boots of his testy predecessor. The people felt let down. Inheriting Andrew Jackson’s mantle without his popularity, Van Buren also inherited the expresident’s numerous and vengeful enemies. Van Buren’s four years overflowed with toil and trouble. A rebellion in Canada in 1837 stirred up ugly incidents along the northern frontier and threatened to trigger war with Britain. The president’s attempt to play a neutral game led to the wail, “Woe to Martin Van Buren!’’ The antislavery agitators in the North were in full cry. Among other grievances, they were condemning the prospective annexation of Texas. Worst of all, Jackson bequeathed to Van Buren the makings of a searing depression. Much of Van Buren’s energy had to be devoted to the purely negative task of battling the panic, and there were not enough rabbits in the “Little Magician’s’’ tall silk hat. Hard
Since Jackson ended up winning the election based on popularity, thus the tariff that his administration was aiming to push through to embarrass Adams and his administration wasn’t needed, so when it was unexpectedly passed, the South was outraged, as their economy wasn’t booming like the rest of the nation, resulting in South Carolina wanting to nullify the tariff acts and label them unconstitutional, thus making there state have authority over the federal government, yet Henry Clay proposed a compromise that reduced tariffs for 11 years, avoiding the nullification, so the South withdrew their protest.
In the United States so far, there have been dozens of presidents. To be exact, there have been 44 presidents. Every president has made his own, unique contribution to get the country to where it is today. Andrew Jackson, the seventh president of the United States, was perhaps the most controversial president America has experienced. Jackson was a successful president in his own mind, escaping difficult living conditions as a child in South Carolina and fighting for the nation in the War of 1812 to completing his goals as president. Some of his achievements, however, did not benefit the country and its people. His egocentric behavior caused for harsh and brutal actions towards Indians. Although Jackson was able to fulfill his goals
He promised the south a reduction in the taxes and duties they were enduring to the levels first established in1828. These set levels were acceptable to the southerners as opposed to the higher rates enforced since then. In 1832 Jackson reduced these rates by a small margin, not nearly as much as his original promise. Regardless of South Carolina upset, in 1833 Jackson passed the Force Bill. This coerced them into paying the tariff no matter what.4
The modern presidency has in a sense become a double-edged sword in that presidents have become beneficiaries of anything positive that can be attributed to government, but also can be blamed for anything bad occurring in society. Quite simply, the modern president has become the center of our political system (The Modern Presidency, 2004). The men who have dealt with this double-edged sword known as the modern presidency have often walked a very fine line between effectiveness and ineffectiveness, but all have attempted to use their power in one way or another.