1) Inventories, is similar to the US GAAP definition under Accounting Standards Codification, ASC 330. According to Ernst & Young (2013) article, they are both based on the principle that the primary basis of accounting for inventory is cost. Both define inventory as assets held for sale in the ordinary course of business, in the process of production for such sale or to be consumed in the production of goods or services (pg.71). This which lead to the entries above. Under U.S. GAAP, the company reports inventory on the balance sheet at the lower of expense or market, where business sector is characterized as replacement cost of$180,000, with net realizable value of $190,000 and net realizable value less a normal profit of $152,000. In this case, stock was composed down to replacement cost and provided details regarding the December 31, 2014 asset report at $180,000. A $70,000 loss was incorporated into 2014 income. The company would report inventory on the balance sheet at the lower of cost $250,000 as historical cost and net realizable value as $190,000. Inventory would have been accounted for on the December 31, 2014 asset report a net realizable estimation of $190,000 and a loss on write-down of inventory of $60,000 (the historical cost subtracted from net realizable expense) would have been reflected in net income. IFRS income would be $10,000 bigger than U.S. GAAP net pay. IFRS held earnings would bigger by the same amount.
2) Under both US GAAP and IFRS property,
The error would’ve been correct on the current period first quarter results. To correct the overstatement of 8 million in inventory, a credit or decrease for $8 mill should’ve been done on the inventory account, and the retained earnings should’ve been debited for the same amount:
The purpose of this research paper is to summarize research on codification topic 410 based on the information found in different academic databases. The first part of the paper will focus on the FASB Codification database. The second part of the paper will compare and contrast three other databases on the same codification 410 within the RIA Checkpoint databases: AICPA: Auditing and Accounting Guides, SOX Reporter, and GAAP Practice Manual. A summary of benefits and issues with the searches of each database will also be discussed.
Entity-wide disclosures are required under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 280-10-50-40 through 280-10-50-42. The disclosures are required because every corporation does not report information in a similar fashion, and the disclosures would provide comparability of the financial statements among entities. For example, if a corporation uses a geographic approach in its financial statements, disclosing certain information about the products or services sold will make comparability to other companies much easier. The disclosures will also help with comparability within an entity if they decide to choose another method of reporting operating segments in the future. There are three types of entity-wide disclosures; products and services, geographic areas, and/or major customers. Every public company has to comply with the disclosures, even if the company has one reportable segment. The only exception to the entity-wide disclosures is if it is impractical to provide the information, such as it would be extremely costly to the corporation, or if the “internal reporting systems are not capable of gathering financial information by product or service by geographic area.” A disclosure should be made when entity-wide disclosures are impractical.
Even if uniformity were to be reached, the IOSCO disclosure standards do not encircle all of the information required of an easy access to cross-border capital markets.
330-10-35-1 A departure from the cost basis of pricing the inventory is required when the utility of the goods is no longer as great as their cost. Where there is evidence that the utility of goods, in their disposal in the ordinary course of business, will be less than cost
Under tax law, the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) states four possible sources of taxable income. These four sources may realize a tax benefit for deductible temporary differences and carryforwards. The sources as stated directly in ASC 740-10-30-18 are:
The Board is currently proposing a new simplified guidance on the measurement of inventory. The Board suggests that inventory should be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value, eliminating the old guidance of measuring inventories. The Board defined net realizable value in ASC paragraph 330-10-20 as “Estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation.” The new guidance should help companies to disclose the measurement of inventory more concisely and reduce the cost to account for them. In addition to that proposal, the Board are also aligning with the measurement of inventory with International Financial Reporting Standard. According to IFRS No. 2, inventories are required to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. IAS No. 2 defined net realizable value as “the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.” This definition is aligning with the definition under
The FASB Codification database is easy to use when researching the accounting standards once the basics are fully understood. The FASB Codification database can be accessed by logging in at http://aaahq.org/ascLogin.cfm and using the following codes (case sensitive):
Cash flow is one of the most important aspects of running any business whether large or small. It is one of the single most important reasons why many businesses fail, this does not matter whether how good a business is. Managing a cash flow therefore is vitally important in the smooth running survival and success of a business.
However, this Statement maintains the scope of Interpretation 46(R) with the previous additional entities treated as special qualifying entities for purposes. The concept of these entities was eliminated in Statement No. 166. Therefore, the statement No. 167 also superseded the risks of quantitative-based and calculation of rewards to determine which enterprise, if any, provided a financial interest that controls an entity variable interest because the expectation of an access of the basic qualitative will be more efficient to identify which company has a financial interest of controlling in an entity variable interest. However, this is the way the FASB admitted to upgrade the financial reporting standards. Other additional necessity is an additional review event when deciding whether a company is a variable entity interest when there are any occurring circumstances and changes in facts. For instinct, the owner of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights to direct the activities of the entity that some characteristic impacts the economic entity’s performance. There will also be ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the key beneficiary of a variable interest entity.
The effect of writing off the inventory for the year’s income is one that has a drastic effect on the balance sheet according to Porter and Norton (2013) because, it determines the amount eventually recognized as an expense on the income statement. An error in assigning the proper amount to inventory on the balance sheet will affect the amount recognized as cost of goods sold on the income statement. (Using Financial Accounting Information: The Alternative to Debits and Credits, 9th Edition, section 5-6, para 2)
I am working with our ABC client, and I wanted to let you know the issue regarding their Available-for-sale equity securities. For the second consecutive quarter, the client has been recording a decline in market value for several of their securities in “other comprehensive income”. The securities’ fair value are now below their cost. The issue with this situation is to determine if the securities are considered impaired, and if such impairment is considered “other than temporary”, in which case the company would have to account for the loss in a different way.
| The following inventory information above was taken from the records of BlobeKom Ltd.:Historical Cost $12,000Replacement Cost $ 9,000Expected selling price $10,000Expected selling cost $ 500Normal profit margin 10% of selling priceUnder U.S. GAPP, what should the Balance Sheet report for Inventory?Answer
First, The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issues The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) on U.S securities and exchange companies listed.
Discussion on harmonization is started quite long time ago. Its impact on the countries economy is good or bad is the central idea of this essay. This essay is written specifically on the accounting standard used in Australia. This essay starts with introduction on various topics such as conceptual framework, IASB, Sacs then it discussed the issue of harmonization. Harmonization will have positive impact on the economy because it attracts overseas investors to invest in Australia. This essay covers difference between conceptual framework developed in Australia and IASB framework. There are given lot of difference such as treatment of non for profit entity is same as the public entity in A-IFRS. Reporting entity concepts and