The Act Of Terrorism Is Justified

Terror is Justified Violence isn’t the way, but in France this is not the case. In France 1789 the French Revolution started. It was caused by King Louis XVI considering the people wanted Liberty, Sovereignty, and equality. Since the people wanted those thing King Louis was forced to share his power. The Reign of Terror began in September 5, 1793; which was led by Maximilien Robespierre.

In my point of view, terrorism actions generally contribute nothing to their political ends. I acknowledge that perhaps some terrorists care about proportionality. However, how can acts such as detonating a suicide bomb in a busy subway station or attacking a school help achieve their political goals? Actually, the vast majority of terrorist groups merely intentionally decimate the lives of innocents. What those acts of terrorism bring about are thousands of civilian deaths and injuries, and the most exquisite torment to their families. For example, in September 11 attacks, terrorists successfully bombed the World Trade Center. Such terrorism act indeed disturbs the American political and economic system in a short run. Nevertheless, the loss of the World Trade Center definitely does not make an impact on the American economy. On the contrary, the terrorism action causes a large amount of casualties. Lots of children therefore lose their parents and family members of those victims have to suffer from intense sorrow of loss of a loved one constantly. It is categorically immoral to violate human dignity and deliberately inflict suffering on others, for pointless political ends.

By punishing traitors and conspirators, particularly if they are deputies or administrators; by sending loyal troops under patriotic leaders to subdue the aristocrats of… [all] regions in which the standards of rebellion and royalism have been raised; and by making frightful examples of all scoundrels who have outraged liberty and spilled the blood of patriots” (Robespierre, Despotism in Defense of Liberty).

Terrorism is a major threat to national and global security that encompasses more than violent means by foreigners and Islamic extremists. This is mainly because most of the recent terror acts in America have been carried out by single-issue individuals and special-interest extremists with the intention of protecting the environment and animals based on their beliefs. Actually, terrorism is described as the illegitimate use of extreme violence and force with the intention of coercing a

Criminal activity and terrorist activity have a relationship that is closely related, with only minor differences separating the two. Terrorist activity are criminal acts that are motivated by a higher cause beyond the basic causes of crime. Terrorist attack are highly planned out, and the same can be said about criminal activity. Serial killers often plan out their acts just as much as terrorist organizations, however the same cannot be said for certain crimes like random assaults. (Newman & Clarke, 2008) The relationship between crime and terrorism is brought closer when terrorist organizations use common crime to fund their attacks. For example, a terrorist organization may resort to stealing chemical agents to make their dirty bombs. The

The main payment systems to transfer funds to finance the global Islamic terrorism are through the traditional banking channel: wire-transfers and the hawala. Heads of terror groups operate in a different fashion, using higher value and higher risk methods of financing like drug trafficking in Afghanistan and diamond smuggling in Africa.

The way terrorist groups has been communicating and recruiting new has been changing, due to the emerging use

Chapter 11 in the textbook Homeland Security by Larry K. Gaines and Victor E. Kappeler, discussed in lengthy detail the way terrorist cells go about financing, as well as their financial needs. However, one of the most common questions asked today; once the terrorist organizations obtain the needed funds to plot an attack how do they go about moving the money without being detected? The answer given in chapter 11 in the textbook is through money laundering (Gaines & Kappeler, 2012, p. 315). Pursuing this further, terrorist cells go about laundering their money through a verity of methods. To better elaborate, one well known way to launder money is through priceless

Michael Walzer is a highly accredited Political Theorist and is well known for breaking down ideas with reason. He is the type of person you would expect to apply reason to all situations. In his paper Terrorism: a Critique of Excuses, that terrorism is one of the greatest evils. You may be thinking, “of course everyone knows that.” However, I believe that he is wrong for saying this and that he should reconsider why someone resorts to terrorism.

All of those necessities are available to the terrorist because they use The Bureau de Change to get the money. “Terrorism financing has found a safe haven in the Bureau”(Mbanga 1). These days the money exchange is even easier to do because the competition is very strong between the Bureaus so they aren’t taking their time looking at their clients and caution is being thrown out the window. A few more money sources are charities, donations, and ransom money. Donations and charities would be harder to eliminate, however, ransom money is in total control of all of the nations.

Terrorist funding is a vital fragment of what allows the smooth transition of missions and acts of violence to take place. The money acquired goes into planning and executing assignments and operations. Funds are needed in order to provide radicals with adequate training, food and lodge, firepower and weapons, passports with different identities as well as communication support. The members of terrorist groups have to rely on funding in order to fulfill sustainment capabilities as well being able to function on a day to day basis. Many of them have families to support and the use of terrorist funding often goes back to the member’s families as contribution of their services and volunteerism to their cause whether political or religious.

David Rodin claims that, 'the case for both for and against preventative war is made in consequentialist terms' which he believes to be a mistake. Rodin states that, 'Consequentialism suffers from debilitating epistemdpgical problems that renders it effectivly useless as a moral theory of war'. Walter Sinnott-Armstrong however concludeds that conseqentiaism under certain cercumstances can be benifical in preventive war. Sinnott-Armstrong argues that 'conseqentialism raises serious doubts about cases that previously seemed easy might show how illluminating consequentialism is' asserning that this is a virtue not a vice of consequentialism'. Futhermore, Snniott-Armstrong argues that despite Rodins claim that consequentialism is usless in preventive war, that the evidence is there its just a matter of weighing it all together. Although Sinnott-Armstrong admits that Rodin assertion that 'Consequenistialism is frequently a deeply disapointing guide', that

The ever evolving subject of terrorism and terrorists is the subject of significant study worldwide. The psychological and behavioral factors involved in terrorism are one of the most studied issues. It has implications across the board for both the detection and deterrence of terrorism. How terrorists communicate and the influence that it plays in growing terroristic ideology, mission, and goals are also of significant importance, as well.

Technology in the twenty-first century changed terrorism quite a bit. The evolution of the internet introduced cyberterrorism to us. Cyberterrorism can be defined as the intentional use of computer, networks, and public internet to cause destruction and harm for personal objectives.

Terrorism, according to the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, is “the unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons” (Follendore). Terrorism was more myth than reality for most Americans until the attack of 9/11. The act of terrorism is meant to subdue societies with fear but it is impossible to instill fear without tools. Without capital, terrorists are unable to act; even terrorists are reliant upon money. Since their country of origin dislikes most terrorist groups, it is hard to set up businesses and become successful independently so an outside income source is required. Drugs and drug trafficking are huge moneymakers that are also tax-free. The drug trade is cash-based and full of money. James Bovard says in an essay that “because narcotics are illicit, they tend to attract violent, ruthless people and organizations to carry out their production and marketing.” Further he says, “groups that specialize in violence—such as terrorists—take to drug trafficking like a duck to water” (Bovard). Drugs are present and fairly common within the United States and if drug sales are reduced, terrorism will diminish over time, unless it finds a new