The Advantages Of Top Down Approach To Engineering Problems

The initial task was aimed to test whether the motor could life a range of valued weights between 20 grams and 100 grams. Whilst testing the motors capacity to hold certain weights, an input and an output formula were used to calculate the efficiency of the motor. This was relative to the Voltage, Current, time, gravity, height (string off the ground) and the mass of the weights. Fortunately each of the three sets of four given weights was successfully lifted by the motor across a variation of times. This data also changed the readings on the voltmeters and ammeters. The results that were calculated along with the efficiencies were both successful and astounding to come across especially as the graphs trend above goes up and down, rather than in a single direction.

In the problem analysis phase of effective decision making, group members should recognize any obstacle that may arise that needs to be improved or changed and determine the characteristics, magnitude, and possible cause(s) of that obstacle confronting them. This phase lays the groundwork for what the group should be prepared for as they work together (Hirokawa & Salazar, 1999 p. 170).After analyzing the problem, the group should then discuss and establish goals and objectives in order to generate proposed solutions of

Using research and using already gained knowledge I will go though each of these topics individually.

to apply the theory to real world cases. A solid understanding of principles in finance,

an explanation or rationale of your work. In this task you are to consider the

Identify the ways in which the theory can be applied and when it is best to

Step number one is the most important. Without defining a problem, the next steps can’t exist. Without a problem, there is no solution to be made. The main part of a decision is a problem. That is why defining the problem is the most important.

TEKS:6.1.B use a problem-solving model that incorporates analyzing given information, formulating a plan or strategy, determining a solution, justifying the solution, and evaluating the problem-solving process and the reasonableness of the solution;

whole of things put them together. Analyze them to draw up a solution to a problem. Analysis:

However, they still required the operator to position the material manually. Automatic machines were designed for use by high-volume producers. ML believed that the increased speed would offset the higher costs for the machines. Two of the automatic machines were pneumatically powered. The primary difference between them was that one machine positioned only one part of the fastener while the other machine positioned both parts of the fastener which increased its speed. The third automatic machine was electrically powered which made it significantly faster than the other two automatic machines, and it could attach multiple fasteners to the same garment.

The basics of this method focus on problem-solving and short-term application. As Ford and Postle (1998, pg 52) suggest

The second step, sort out information that is not needed provided clarity during times in which the process seemed overwhelming. This called for a potential solution, a desired outcome and how to get there. The research that had initially been part of the formulating method had sparked an interest in the military. This idea was supported by the benefits that outweighed

First, integrate all four areas at the same time. Once the managers become more familiar with problems in each area, adapt the parallel problem solving approach. Bundle together related problems across the four areas and tackle them simultaneously. This will help managers make better decisions more quickly without too much guesswork.

Select five (5) and write a detailed explanation of how your use of these techniques could be applied in your personal and business life. b) For each of the five (5) chosen techniques, write and explain the result you would hope to achieve by use of that technique.

Among the 1,300 U.S. orthopedic OEMs, Zelting, Di Preto, and Stemper Corporation were the leaders in joint reconstruction, with a combined market share of 64%; Syphone and Stemper Corporation were the leading OEMs in trauma fixation, with a combined market share of 57%. The selection of motors for use as components in medical devices such as orthopedic products was an involved process, usually requiring electrical engineers at the OEM to consult with application engineers from the motor manufacturer in order to get a customized design specified to their parameters, including physical-size constraints. Given the complex nature of designing and building small-but-sophisticated orthopedic power tools, these “value-add” customer service features were just as important in the OEM decision-making process as the technical features of a motor. The most critical OEM purchasing criteria included the following: Thermal (heat) resistance. A common cause of motor failure was when the expected load (the turning torque) exceeded the motor’s rating, causing the motor to heat up quickly and break down. Usually it was desirable to select a motor that would not reach its maximum operating temperature (measured in degrees Celsius) in the specific orthopedic