The Advocate’s Act of 1961

The Morrill Act of 1862 and 1890 was the beginning of American Public Education. This trend was designed to provide equal opportunity to the different socioeconomic groups.

(2) Tamanaha, Brian. 2008. “Law”, Oxford International Encyclopedia of Legal History, St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-0095. Link in Course Readings and Available online: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1082436&rec=1&srcabs=1012051

In 1767 saw a series of other measures containing contradictory factors. Charles Townshend, the British finance minister, has been trying to build a new fiscal program after repeatedly protesting heavy taxation in the country. With the intention of tax cuts for the British by imposing a more radical tax on the US trade, Charles Townshend tightened tariffs and imposed import duties on the colonies when importing items. British as paper, glass, lead and tea. The Townshend Act was made with the argument that taxes on imported goods of the colonies were legal, but domestic taxes (such as stamp duty) were not legal.

“This Civil Rights Act is a challenge to all of us to go to work in our communities and our states, in our homes and in our hearts, to eliminate the last vestiges of injustice in our beloved country”, this quote from Lyndon B. Johnson truly represents how difficult it was to get to the civil rights act and how hard it was once it was passed. Many cases were apart of this act that played a big role at the U.S. Supreme Court. It wasn't only race that the civil rights act of 1964 ended it also ended segregation in race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The Civil rights act was a big movement effecting so many people: Dred Scott v. Sanford, Plessy v. Furguson, and Brown v. Board of education.

The ESEA Act of 1965 was enacted to offer equal educational opportunities to children from low income students with the help of Title 1 being the largest source of funding. With the help of Title 1 the schools would be able to provide supplemental services to these children. In Contrast, The NCLB Act requires states to use standardized test to test students in reading, math and science to see if academic progress is made and the students are proficient in grade level of these subjects. The NCLB Act also focused on eliminating socioeconomic and racial differences providing quality education to all students of America regardless of ethnic, socioeconomic and racial background. Whereas the ESEA Act only focused on low income family students, the NCLB Act included low- income students, students with disabilities, major racial and ethnic groups and English language learners by providing test results to show improvement and that each student reach the appropriate grade level performance. (Thomas & Brady, 2005, p. 51-56). Furthermore, A blueprint for Reform: The Reauthorization of the ESEA differed by focusing on “moving from a punishment based system to a system that rewarded students and teachers for excellent teaching and student growth” (Woolfork, 2014, p.X). In Comparison, all of these educational policies have the same goal which is to improve the educational experience of students in all areas and populations. These policies help with the effectiveness of teaching learning

A complaint was filed against Mr. Doré, by the Syndic du Barreau for violation of article 2.03 of the Code of ethics of advocates, R.R.Q. 1981, c. B-1, r.1, and oath of office. The article stated that the “conduct of an advocate must bear the stamp of objectivity, moderation and dignity” (Para. 13) which the judicial council concluded that Mr. Doré violated. The Judicial council, rejecting Mr. Dore’s claim that the letter was private, concluded that Judge Boilard’s conduct did not justify the content in letter. (Doré, at para.16)

1. The purpose and intent of The Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) as it relates to torts

5. Review and be able to explain the applicability of the Administrative Procedural Act of 1946 to public policy in the context of public agencies found in the Kerwin and Furlong book.

Issue 2 and 5: The Court noted that the exclusion of principles of natural justice (PNJ) is a well known concept and the legislature has the competence to enact such laws. Whether the exclusion of application of PNJ would vitiate the entire proceedings would depend upon the nature and facts of every case in the light of the Act or Rules and Regulation applicable to the case. The Court, then, read into various provisions of the Act and the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations, 2009 in order to determine the nature of functions of the Commission under various provisions. The Court found that at the face of it, the exercise of power u/s. 26(1) of the Act while forming prima facie opinion is inquisitorial and regulatory. It held that while forming prima facie opinion, the Commission does not condemn anyone. This function is not adjudicatory in nature but merely administrative. This function is in the nature of preparatory measures in contrast to the decision making process and hence

Include name of parties in the case at the Court of first instance and Appellate Courts and name of Trial and Appellate judges.

Indigenous Australians developed trust issues during colonisation. When the settlers invaded, life would never be the same for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island people. Land that had been theirs for roughly 40,000 years was stripped from the Indigenous Australians and all rights were taken away. Most settlers were extremely racist and wanted the Indigenous Australians gone. One settler from Hunter Valley went as far as comparing the Aborigines to apes (Wilson-Miller, 2011). The 1905 Act in Western Australia was then drawn up to provide the Aborigines care and protection. The 1905 Act with its long list of rules and regulations did everything but provide care and protection. Aborigines were carefully watched and everything they did was monitored.

Since implementation the Act has simplified and improved the regulation of legal service provision in England and Wales and has created a framework for legal services to be provided. The regulatory objectives and professional principles are set out in section 1 of the Act.

Such bills need the national council of all provinces to follow an extended procedure than legislation that does not affect the provinces. The shortcoming with the current bill conditions that it was drafted in partnership with the National house of traditional leaders and ascribes a list of advice-giving workshops all of which complicated modern leaders only it seems that no effort was made to refer to normal rural people or consult rural women as particular interest group. The bill is criticised for labelling traditional leaders as ruling majors in the traditional courts, eliminating some assembly surrounded by the traditional justice system, establishing the insufficient and limited contribution of women other exposed groups in pronouncement making, leaving out legal specialists from demonstrating complainants, authorising authorisations that go outside the present justice scheme and letting for limited application device (Bennet,

Critically assess the different sources and characteristics of the English Legal System. To what extents have external influences affected its development.

The Supreme Court of India has adopted a forward-looking approach since last few years, particularly having regard to the socio-economic conditions prevailing in the country. In fact there are two kinds of approaches which characterise the functioning of the highest Court in every