The Age Of Extremes : 1914-1991 Is A Book By Eric Hobsbawm

Barbara Ehrenreich 's showed that she didn't have the mind set or worries of a working class person by reminding us as readers the fine line between the kind of performance she is doing and the kind her fellow coworkers do every day on the job. Time and again she lets us sink into her new world of a low-wage worker, only to pull us back with a reminder of the act. 1 She does this experiment to determine whether or not she could both live off the money earned and have enough money at the end of the month to pay the next month's rent. Working class people depend on the money they make on these jobs to survive and provide for their families. She could drop all these jobs she experimented with and go back to her real life without a worry in the

The issues I focused on in my analysis of Cal students are marriage and parenthood. Specifically, I chose to compare how opinions on these issues differed by gender. Kathleen Gerson discusses the new generation’s expectations from marriage and families to a great degree in her book The Unfinished Revolution. As Gerson states, “Most of my interviewees hope to create lasting, egalitarian partnerships, but they are also doubtful about their chances of reaching this goal.” (10) This is a characteristic that also stood out in my analysis: the majority of the students interviewed hope to create an egalitarian relationship in which there is no strict enforcement of traditional gender roles. Or as Gerson says, “…the vast majority want a permanent bond, but they do not wish for that bond to be defined by rigid gender distinctions.” (104) I only encountered one exception to this trend: a female student who expressed the desire to become a full time stay-at-home mom after having children, thereby putting all financial responsibility on her spouse. One thing that was different in my findings was that with the exception of one or two, these Cal students do not think it will be difficult to find a suitable partner. This is likely because most students

There is a controversial debate about the 1920s, whether it was “roaring” or whether is was destitute. In the perspective of some historians, the 1920s brought a rapid increase in urbanization and boom in the economy, however, these historians fail to see the evident terrors that the 1920s brought. The positive uproar on the 1920s did not stand a chance against the rising negative roar of residential schools, the Stock Market Crash, and credit debt. Due to these tragic events, 1920s was brought a dark and negative atmosphere rather than one of contentment.

During the “Roaring Twenties” in the United States, the stock market had never been better. When vice president Calvin Coolidge took the reins in 1923, business soared. Factories were turning to Henry Ford’s model of the assembly line to drastically increase product output, and many companies in America were becoming multinational, (Foner, 615), such as General Electric and International Business Machines (IBM), who bought out other companies in war torn Europe. Unlike in past years, Americans were focused on having a good time. They were taking their families on vacations across the country or out to sporting events. With the majority of the United States out enjoying the booming economy and all the luxuries that accompany it, no one was paying attention to the signs of trouble on the horizon. All of their reckless choices and decisions were leading to a major downfall. During the Roaring Twenties, the people skyrocketed the American debt.

David M. Potter theme of Impending Crisis is the study of sectional conflict dealing primarily with political events that led up to or caused southern states to secede from the Union resulting in the Civil War. Potter contends that during the expansionist period of the 1840s the country was experiencing a growth of American nationalism, but “the emergence of the sectionalism which almost destroyed the nation was symbolized by an amendment to an appropriation bill which was never enacted.” For the next fifteen years the Wilmot Proviso (1846) and the issue of slavery would become “a catalyst of all sectional antagonisms, political, economic, and cultural…opened the floodgates of sectionalism, for now all the pent-up moral indignation which had been walled in by the constitutional inhibition could be vented into the territorial question.”

The 1920 presidential election proved to be memorable as well as historically significant for a number of reasons. This time period is surrounded by important events in American history. It falls directly after World War I, starts the roaring twenties, and leads the United States into the Great Depression. Warren G. Harding was elected president over all other candidates, with promises of life going back to normal conditions. At this point in time, American citizens were desperate for one thing: their old “normal” life. The election of 1920 was important because our nation had just gotten out of World War I, the vote ended in a landslide, and Harding changed the United States for the worse.

“The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.”- President Franklin D. Roosevelt. This words were announced to the American public by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in his Inaugural Address, where he tried to reassure the people that everything would be fine. Having just experienced the prosperous era of the Roaring Twenties, not many people thought good times would ever end. However, this proved to be incorrects as pandemonium and turmoil overcame the people in October 29, 1929 with the Stock Market Crash. With the economy sliding downhill, Americans faced many problems that would change the government’s role in the economy. Nevertheless, many actions were also taken by both individuals and groups alike in response to this economic depression.

The progress made in the 20th century is staggering. Advancements in science, medicine and technology alone have brought incalculable benefits to human beings. Yet on the darker side, the 20th century was also the most violent time of human history. Two world wars, the massacres of Stalin, the Holocaust of Hitler, and many other such events killed over hundreds of millions of people and inflicted extreme suffering on hundreds of millions more that will make this period in time and period that will be remembered forever.

The book Only Yesterday: An Informal History of the 1920s by Frederick Lewis Allen recounts all the events leading up to the stock market crash in 1929, beginning with the end of World War I in 1918. The story, told chronologically, contrasts the changing social and political views of the American people throughout the “Roaring Twenties,” as the time period came to be known. Allen makes history enjoyable, vividly describing the creases in Al Capon’s shirt and the painted faces of the young generation.

Subject: Reflects how these collapse of historical societies features manifest themselves in American society to gain better idea of what our future holds.

World War 1 was a very terrifying event that completely changed the mankind. Besides the way people looked at the war, it also changed the way how people look at other countries, their own country and even their own neighbours. Lives of soldiers, politics, celebrities, normal people such as workers, but also minorities such as women and African-Americans changed completely. It was an era of fun, dancing, enjoying life, new technology and celebrating the fact that the “war to end all wars” was finally over. However, Roaring 20’s was not just a postwar era that brought a huge changes to society, it also encouraged a rapid development of politics.

In her essay, Barbra Fields describes the era of ideologies as beginning in the late eighteenth century. Ideologies are created by a culture or society that justifies their views and practices. More specifically, racial ideologies, was the justification Euro-Americans used in choosing Afro-American slaves over indentured servitude in 1661. Prior to 1661, however, during the tobacco boom, the primary system of forced labor was indentured servitude of Europeans, not African slaves. Overtime, indentured servitude gave way to the enslavement of Afro-Americans due to it becoming more systemized. One way of seeing why this shift occurred would be through the ideology Euro-Americans held; they could no longer bear to put hardships upon their own

While technological and cultural changes were at an all-time high, many people experienced harsh times and a lack acceptance. This time in US history has monikers, including: The Roaring Twenties and The Jazz Age. But, in actuality, it is similar to post Civil War America in the time called the Gilded Age. The 20s were romantically excessive, socially diversifying, and on the outside seen in a golden hue. However, on the inside, they were dark, flawed, and exclusive. The 1920s did propel the United States of America in to modernism but instigated the attitude that lead to the most devastating recession in history, the Great Depression. Bringing back to mind the buy now pay later sentiment, the American people paid dearly in 1929 when the stock market utterly collapsed. (Especially those who were not on the successful side of the spectrum.) Nonetheless, this time is history for a reason. And that reason is that the mistakes of the past can hopefully be

As most people would agree, the 20th century contained some of the bloodiest and most gruesome events ever recorded in history. Why do words such as Hiroshima, Rwanda, The Final Solution, A Great Leap Forward, The Great Purge and so many more spark such vivid images of blood, torture and murder in our minds? And despite those horrific images, what is it that causes us humans time and time again to commit such crimes against humanity? Those are the kinds of questions Jonathan Glover, a critically acclaimed ethics philosopher, tries to answer in the book he had spent over ten years writing, Humanity: A Moral History of the 20th Century. Through Humanity Glover tries to answer those questions in a way which will give a solution as how we can

For Hobsbawm the Age of Extremes follows those of Revolution, Capitalism, and Empire on which he has already written at length and with great distinction. Hobsbawm clearly divides the ages into `The Age of Catastrophe ' (1914-50), `The Golden Age ' (1950-75), and `The Landslide ' (1975 to 1991 and beyond). Neither the periodization nor the titles are important, however Hobsbawm has limited himself to the `short Twentieth Century ' marked by the start of the First World War and concluding with the collapse of the Soviet Union at the start of the 1990 's. In practice, Hobsbawm analysis is shown to move on beyond 1991 and makes it apparent of his awareness of the political forces that need to be understood if 1914 were to be explained. As the economic growth between these two points might just be termed `golden ', if not for all, it is hardly convincing to describe the period since 1975 as a `landslide ', as if things have been rolling steadily downhill since that point. Such an image does not do justice to a much more complex picture.