Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)

Professional auditing standards discuss the three key “conditions” that are typically present when a financial fraud occurs and identify a lengthy list of “fraud risk factors.”

2 Managing fraud risk: The audit committee perspective Fraud in a fi nancial statement audit

Legitimacy in accounting practices is ensured by the check and balance of having independent auditors from registered public accountant firms reviewing financial practices. The report features eleven sections and these sections pertain to accounting overview, independence of auditors to reduce interest conflicts, corporate responsibility, financial disclosures, tax returns, criminal fraud and various elements of white collar criminal activity (107th Congress

In 1973, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) was created and their mission is “to establish and improve standards of financial accounting and reporting for the guidance and education of the public, including issuers, auditors, and users of financial information.” (FASB.org, 2009a). The FASB is a private, not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is to develop generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) within the United States. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) designated the FASB as the organization responsible for setting accounting standards for public companies in the U.S. Therefore, the FASB plays a vital and important role in protecting the financial well being and the overall stability of our

These businesses realize that maintaining the public’s trust is one of the keys to commercial success, so they employ investigative accountants to strategically manage the complexities of risks and threats. Investigative accountants scrutinize fraudulent activities, assist senior management with risk management and strive to mitigate potential vulnerabilities. Investigate accountants often respond to fraud allegations and reported financial irregularities. They adopt a strategic threat management approach that enables them to anticipate and respond to risks. They apply advanced technology approaches to help internal customers track and manage data activities. They employ information management principles, data analytics techniques and sophisticated technology tools to help management make well-informed

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act created the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) to assume the responsibility of overseeing the auditors of public companies. The PCAOB is a private-sector, non-profit corporation. It was established to "protect the interests of investors and further the public interests in the preparation of informative, fair, and independent audit reports". (The PCAOB) Although the PCAOB is a private sector organization, it has many government-like regulatory functions. The PCAOB was created in response to an increasing number of accounting restatements by public companies during the 1990s and a series of recent high-profile scandals like Enron and WorldCom. Prior to the PCAOB, the audit industry was self-regulated

Corporate fraud was the cornerstone for the strict implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). SOX implements many compliance regulations, but one of its regulations, specifically Section 404, relates to an organization’s internal control procedures with the purpose of protecting organizational assets and investors’ interest. Consequently, organizations, big or small, private or public, are prone to fraud. SOX’s compliance of internal control procedures is developed through the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) known as the COSO framework that consists of the following procedures: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication and monitoring. Each variable address a layer that builds upon each other by

This report provides information about the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board for Dr. Mack. The information includes the history and creation of the PCAOB, its structure, and its duties in today’s accounting world.

According to Daniel F. Dooley (2008), a member of the Commercial Fraud Taskforce, financial fraud with private middle-market companies is on the rise. In fact, Mr. Dooley believes that he has seen more instances of fraud in the past two years than in the previous ten. He notes seven areas in which financial fraud has increased over the past few years:

telecommunications company, was a victim of these expectations that led to the evolution of a

through the proper channels (Cascarino, Richard E., 2012, pg. 10). Most company’s experience an issue with fraud at one point in its operations. It is very unusual to find an entity that has never had to handle fraud in any aspect. Regulatory challenges in “controlling fraud goes beyond giving the appearance” of attacking the issue by combating with some of the fundamental causes (Cascarino, 2012, pg. 130). It is very important to try and have controls set to deter fraud to the very minimal amount, however it is imperative to continue theses controls well into the future to ward of any other fraudulent attacks (Cascarino, 2012, pg. 130).

According to Lindsey Thompson being a Certified Public Accountant also known as CPAs and fulfill a number such as preparing and filing taxes, auditing, financial planning and bookkeeping

Fraudulent, erroneous, and illegal acts committed by a public company, usually at a managerial or executive level, have been a very serious problem for many years and have prompted development of strict and updated regulations, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, in an attempt to prevent these occurrences. Unfortunately, these new or updated regulations are not enough to prevent these acts from happening, thus not alleviating the auditors of their responsibility to detect fraud. Some methods that management and auditors can employ to prevent and detect fraud, errors, and illegal acts are: improving knowledge, improving skills,

Accusing the wrong companies of fraud is costly, both to the accused companies and to the public as a whole as such false claims to an injustice to law enforcement, investor and even public participation processes. Detecting Management Fraud in Public Companies is a refinement and confirmation study of the past studies that tested various models for detecting fraud, and updates them by checking how much more efficient they might be with newer methodologies that allow for more credible data management. By definition, some of the people who undertake fraudulent activities use tactics to hide their practices. The proposed revisions demonstrate that more sensitive techniques allow for at least better identifying the "grey area" where such companies may hide using publicly available data so as to minimize false presumptions to begin with (1158). Such refinements are seen as having specific, measurable returns for those seeking to eliminate fraud as well as for those who try to do honest assessments of the strength of companies who appear to be moving forward.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued for public comment two Exposure Drafts related to its disclosure framework project. The first exposure draft proposes amendments to Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts - Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting, Chapter 3 – Qualitative Characteristics of Useful Financial Information. The purpose of this proposed amendment is to clarify the concept of “materiality”. FASB defines materiality as, information is material if omitting it or misstating it could influence decisions that users make on the basis of the financial information of a specific reporting entity. In other words, materiality is an entity-specific aspect of relevance based on the nature or magnitude or both of the items to which the information relates in the context of an individual entity’s financial report. Consequently, the Board cannot specify a uniform quantitative threshold for materiality or predetermine what could be material in a particular situation.