The Analytical Versus Holistic Approach Of Leadership Essay

Studies on the subjects of leadership and management have the underlying difference between a leader and a manager as “managers maintain things and leaders change things.” Gill (2006:26) explains their difference as “Managers plan, allocate resources, administer and control whereas leaders innovate, communicate and motivate”

To be efficient and effective in management, certain tasks must be performed by all managers. Managers must be able to plan, organize, lead, and control. Manager’s tasks are important no matter the level of the manager. Managers must be able to use and improve these skills depending on their position within the organization.

Leadership and management are two terms which are different and should not be confused with one another. The difference in these terms is based upon their motivation, personal history, how they think and act, their orientation toward goals, work, human relationships and themselves, and their views of the world (Grossman & Valiga, 2009, p.5). In leadership, their vision and goals come from a personal interest and passion in which may not be within the goals of the organization. In management, their vision and is from within the organization and not from their personal interest or

Understanding the difference and similarities between managers and leaders can be enlightening. Managers develop and manage plans that impact the strategic vision of an organization while leaders set strategic visions for the organization. Managers establish plans, support strategic plans, and organizational objectives. Managers also evaluate and track the achievement of tactical plans that have been assigned to specific staff. While on the other hand leaders motivate staff to achieve the object and task set forth. Managers serve as problem solvers. Managers are the people who assign resources to groups. On the hand leaders serve as persuasive change agents.

Management is working in the system while leadership is working on the system. They actually speak for themselves a manger manages people and work while the leader job is to lead people. Leaders and managers thinking process, goal setting, employee relations, operation and governance is all different. Leaderships thinking process focuses on people and looks outward while management focuses on things and looks inward. Goal setting in leadership articulates visions and also creates the future while management executes plans and improves the present. Leaders employee relations empowers colleague’s, trust and develops and manager’s controls, subordinates, directs and coordinates. Leaders operation does the right things usually creates change and serves subordinates but management does things right, manages change and serves superordinate’s. Leaders governance uses influences, conflict and acts decisively and manager’s governance uses authority, Avoids conflict and acts

Managers need to be able to plan ahead and to set objectives and co-ordinate the work force, delegate

In addition, leadership itself can be described in various forms and through the highlight of different skill sets, but the one thing that all definitions have in common is that “leadership involves influencing the attitudes, beliefs, behaviours and feelings of other people” Spector’s work (as cited in Curtis, de Vries, & Sheerin, 2011, p.306). When the skill set of a leader is compared to that of a manager, true differences are noted. Some of these key differences are apparent even in the approach utilized to reach the desired goals. While a manager directs, a leader transforms, a manager sustains and a leader improves, a manager controls, a leader motivates, a manager’s focus is on short-term goals and a leader’s is long-term based, managers ask how and when, while

Much has been written about the difference between management and leadership. In the past, competent management staffs ran effective companies. In light of our ever-changing world, however, most companies have come to realize that it is much more important to lead than to manage. In today's world the old ways of management no longer work. One reason is that the degree of environmental and competitive change we are experiencing is extreme. Although exciting, the world is also very unstable and confused. In an article entitled What’s the Difference between Your Hospital and the Other? Gary Campbell states that the difference between a manager and a leader is that the manager “finds himself quite willing to

One way to establish the difference between management and leadership is the fact that leadership is simply one of the many things that a manager should have. In fact, this should be one of the priorities of a manager. But aside from this, a manager also needs to be highly knowledgeable in administrative tasks, because this also comprises a huge part of their job. Specifically, a manager has four major functions to do: Planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. All these functions have been proven to be essential in any kind of management process, and serve as the main foundation of all organizations (Bateman & Snell, 2009).

When I think of the difference between managers and leaders I immediately think of sports. In particular, I think of quarterbacks in football. Quarterbacks the most important player on the field at all times. Quarterbacks should have at least one of the two traits. He should either be able to be a leader or be able to manage. The best can do both. When a quarterback is a great leader he can communicate to the team, the team believes in him and follows his decisions dauntlessly. While a quarterback that is a manager is able to control the game. The type of quarterback that manages the pace and direction of the game may not be the number one motivator, but does execute with precision. To be successful you have to be able to execute, leading

Managers are leaders, leaders are managers, these concepts have long been thought to be synonymous. Ideally, for a manager to be good, the former is the case, but this is not always the case. Further, one doesn’t have to be a manager to be a leader. Anyone can be a leader. They are the people who exhibit superior interpersonal qualities that allows them to create connections to obtain a desired outcome; these are informal leaders (Sullivan). Everyone knows that one or two informal leaders, the people you just get behind and follow because they are so charismatic and influential. They don’t stand up to be recognized, they simply do it, as it comes natural to them. Managers on the other hand are placed in a position of power by an organization

In general, we are familiar with the quote managers do things right while leaders do the right things. In essence, the analytical versus the holistic approach of leadership addresses these two separate and distinct functions within an organization. For instance, a manager focuses on the daily operations of an organization with an emphasis on team delivery, budgeting, and supervising the employees. Contrarily, leaders within an organization focus their time on improvements and innovation. In particular, leaders can perform this function since they are not culpable for routine tasks and mired in the minutia. As a result, there is a misnomer that managers are leaders and leaders remain managers, but they are not exclusive. Therefore, being a manager and a leader requires different abilities and dispositions.

Managing and being a leader share similar traits, but each of these titles differ in terms of long term efficiency. Leading is one of the four management functions, along with planning, organizing, and controlling. For a manager to reach success, leadership is a critical factor a manager must implement daily. There are two views regarding how a manager enacts leadership. One view, the direct responsibility for an organizations success or failure links directly to the manager, or the organizations success or failure is due to external forces outside the managers control. These two categories of leadership are the guidelines that depict how a manager handles obstacles on a daily basis. Managers implement a leadership style and in doing shape themselves into the type of manager others perceive them to be. Comparing and contrasting these two leadership styles from the film 12’O Clock High, regarding General Savage and Colonel Davenport, and an article on Hurricane Katrina, regarding General Honore and Mr. Brown, we see which type of leadership is more effective, efficient, productive and in the long term reaches success.

Management and leadership are viewed as two different perspectives in the business environment. As described by Dr. Warren Bennis ‘Managers are people who do things right, while leaders are people who do the right thing’, this means that managers do things by the set rules and follow company policy, while leaders follow their own intuition, which may in turn be of more benefit to the company.

There are difference in the ideologies between leaders and managers. Those who find themselves in the positions of leading or managing need to search for qualities of booth ideologies within themselves. Managers often view their position as directing and controlling others towards a common task. Managers tend to be rational, under control, problem solvers focusing on structure, personnel, and recourses (Diffen, 2015). In contrast leaders inspire others by sharing their vision, in turn others choose to join them in accomplishing a common goal. "The ability of an individual to influence, motivate, and enable others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organizations of which they are members” (Diffen, 2015).