The And It Ups And Downs

The author, in this article, shows the results from conversations in writing. The results indicate that most students “spend a lot of time writing”, for various purposes. Also, the author introduces a report by professional organizations, which states that writing is

An author’s writing style expresses a different view to their story. Many authors vary in their writing style is shown in the story My First Free Summer, the poem Exile, the poem All American Girl and the short story Antojos. Alvarez’s writing style consists of many factors because she uses imagery, figurative language, and point of view to convey a theme.

The article The Writing Revolution by Peg Tyre is a piece which aims to address the problems in school systems often associated with the way in which writing is taught to students. Tyre’s article conveys the different arguments presented in the course of teaching writing to students, which have shown to be on opposite sides of the creative and analytical spectrum. These different perspectives of how to build the foundation of writing for the children of America as well as other countries are backed similarly by many sides, though the debate still continues. The Writing Revolution instead of focusing on all aspects of writing, highlights the effectiveness of analytical fundamentals over that of creative writing in helping to revolutionize schools and school systems.

Writing may be an enthralling experience for one and a clever way to decompress for another. In general, however, writing has different purposes for a variety of people. “Why I Write,” written in the late 20th century by Terry Tempest Williams, describes various reasons for writing narrated from a female’s perspective. The short essay begins in the middle of the night with a woman engulfed in her own thoughts. She abruptly goes forth by reciting the multiple reasons why she continues to write in her life. Through a variety of rhetorical devices such as repetition, imagery, analogies, and symbolism, Terry Tempest Williams produces an elegant piece of writing that offers the audience insight into the narrator’s life and forces the audience to have empathy for the narrator with the situation she is incurring.

In this article, Bartholomae talks about writers and how they need “invent the university” by imitating the particular language their readers use. He makes strong points on how and why writers need to do this. You must do it by connecting your own point of few to the view of your audience, who is reading your work.

      The writing self isn't something that can be evoked at will, it must be coerced through a series of events, to appear.  Its components are placed together neatly inside the unconscious, waiting to be released.  However when it is trusted to come forth, it is no longer coherent.  A clear picture of what was inside before its unveiling has to be pieced back together.  As we write continually a larger amount of our writing self comes out.  This extension of ourselves being released from our unconscious is the process of the formation of the writer, to the writing self.  The writing self has characteristics that we are unable to control but it determines our writing style.  It grows with every word we write and in this way it is fed and nourished, becoming stronger.  Once it is developed it is its own entity, its own separate being.  It is able to come forth, to be what the writer feels can only be realized through its thoughts and words.

Zinsser’s purpose in comparing his views on the writing process with those of Dr. Brock is to show the student his point of view as a professional writer and to elucidate that the act of writing is not driven by compulsion. Zinsser, who do professional writing as his career state that “rewriting is the essence of writing” (Zinsser 598) to challenge Dr. Brook’s claim that “Whatever form the sentence take will reflect the writer at his most natural” (Zinsser 598). Zinsser pointed out that a professional writer rewrite their sentences over and over again while Dr. Brook, who take writing as his side interest thinks that rewriting is not important. In addition to rewriting as a process of a professional writer, Zinsser also pointed out that emotion

In her analysis, she presents how history has influenced the modern self-writing, and how the transfer of the writing process has been intertwined with the modern technology systems. She presents scenarios that make us believe that writing is not only an art of communication but a system used to reveal oneself and understand self. The practice is as old as time and it is part of the human nature. She has supported most of her arguments creatively, by using both the modern and old sources to present a clear transition and connection that is encompassed in the art of writing for self-formation. For one to understand the present systems, it is important to dig deep into history (Fischhoff, 2013). Sauter has creatively presented historical context of self-writing in the past by exploring the ancient Greek askesis. In her narration she has depended greatly on Foucault works to present the philosophical aspect in the art of writing. Her chronological presentations provide a vivid understanding on writing transition and its effect to the modern systems. She has also used Christian confessional, romantic autobiography, liberation and transgression and Writing in psychology to present a clear insight on writing and its effect on self-formation (Sauter, 2014). Her discussions and presentations are well structured to accommodate conflicting

This paper is going to talk about the analytical points of the paper, “ Unteaching the Five-Paragraph Essay,” by Marie Foley. Describing this paper is one of the easier things to do because it is talking about a basic topic, the five-paragraph essay. It talks about how the five-paragraph essay is good for beginning writers and how it is a setback for other types of writers. It gives a basic concept of how it is not the best format for a writer to use; it is not the best way for complex ideas to be shown.

In this article Elbow tell us that some people are good at writers. However we have to learn how to be a good writer within our hearts not by what your teachers says. Their was some parts that i did not undersatnd when he used the phrase " Once there was a land where people felt helpless about trying to touch the floor without bending their knees". I did not understand what Elbow was trying to tell me. Yes most of the Elbows ideas has help me by first of figuring out the meaning of my writing, and of how to put it into my own words. I did agree that everybody struggles to began writing even if you a good writer or

In conclusion, Tell It Slant is a great resource for students when they are developing new technques in their writing.Furthermore, after examine this edition I felt that by adding these additional pieces students we will be well prepared to write any form of literature. In fact, I sternly believe these pieces will encourage students to find a voice in their writing. In addition, this edition also offers the differnt types of writing and how one should incorporate their ideas with creativity. Subsequently, the literature discussed above will not only add a wider variety for students to study, but it will also encourage them to make the piece their own by adding different components like these authors have.

Writing is always considered as voice of soul since it helps writers to depict their point of view. Writing is basically an art which helps the writers to express themselves just like painters. It is often depicted that writing is a gift which helps writers in presenting their ideas to the world. In the article “Write till you drop”, author has urged the writers to be creative and think out of the box. She thinks that this is necessary for evolution of writing itself since it would not only help writers but would also attract audience. In this essay I am going to express my opinion regarding the originality and fantasy of writers as articulated by

"To write to be a writer, I have to trust and believe in myself as a speaker, as a voice for the images. I have to believe that can communicate with images and words that I can do it well. A lack of belief in my creative self is a lack of belief in my total self and vice versa- I cannot separate my writing from any part of my life. It is all one" (95).

I have selected for discussion three central claims from Love's Knowledge, Nussbaum's essays on philosophy and literature. The first claim pertains to the relation of writing style to content. (3) On this topic Nussbaum suggests that writing style is not neutral; the form of writing influences the content conveyed; certain aspects of life cannot be conveyed adequately in argumentative writing; and literary artists can "state...truths" about human life which escape philosophical prose. (4)

Narrative is the root of some fields which includes education, rhetoric, literature, religion, law, history: culture (Wilson, 1989). It can be seen as a tool to create traditions and symbols as means of communication and it is a source to understand and strengthen the identity of the organisation (Kroeze and Keulen, 2013). As a conceptual theme, narrative becomes a self-conscious system and a reflexive field. In other words, the role of narrative in personal lives is to show how it can be utilized effectively for reflexives practices. In light of this notion, personal reflexive capabilities are a process of exposing or questioning our ways of doing. It is the method for individual through the mirror that has ability to take responsibility for their stories and their exploration, and the role of fact in lives. This essay will focus on how narratives may be reflexively used at different stages, especially history: culture and education, as a tool to access the frameworks.