The And Situational Leadership Theory

As assessment is usually conducted at two phases in any project. (Burt, 2005) First it is conducted to

Rossi, Lipsey and Freeman suggest the following kinds of assessment, which may be appropriate at these different stages: assessment of the need for the program, assessment of program design and logic/theory, assessment of how the program is being implemented, assessment of the program 's outcome or impact, assessment of the program 's cost and efficiency, and assessing needs.

An overview of the assessment form reveals a form that is easy to read and to understand. The form is divided into sections, (discussed in detail in another section of this paper), that cover Presenting Problems and Concerns;

This paper will address why situational leadership theory is useful and relevant in developing an effective leadership culture. In addition, it will also discuss the three theories of situational leadership and what is considered to be the strengths and weaknesses of each theory when leading staff in the organizational environment.

This paper will describe the evaluation stage of the decision-making steps. Working through the last part of the nine step process Nik and Alex will review the factors that will have to be considered during implementation. Nik and Alex will work to evaluate resources that will be needed during this phase of the decision-making process. Once the implementation has taken place measuring the process will be necessary to ensure that the plan stays on track. The evaluation of the stakeholders and the ethical implications of the solution will also need to be evaluated to ensure a proper solution has taken place.

After researching several other leadership styles, I found that situational leadership is the leadership style most effective for myself. Situational leadership is different from most leadership styles because it is adaptable to every circumstance. While other leadership styles are very specific, situational leadership can be used to lead people that are not very knowledgable in a certain area and also people that might know more than you.

Leaders must face various situations effectively. How leaders address the situation is an area of leadership with a lot of theories and research. One of those theories is Hersey-Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory. “Situational Leadership Theory proposes that effective leadership requires a rational understanding of the situation and an appropriate response” (McCleskey, 2014, p. 118). The Life Cycle of Leadership was the original term for Hersey-Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory (Thompson and Glasø, 2015). Because of the need to apply the proper response to a situation, it is no surprise that situational leadership includes four leadership styles (Thompson and Glasø, 2014). However, the theory continues to expand as more research is gathered. For example, situational leadership theory began as a task-oriented versus people-oriented leadership style (McCleskey, 2014, p. 118). As a task-oriented versus people-oriented leadership style, situational leadership is a behavioral theory, which states that no leadership style is the best; instead, the style must reflect the readiness of the subordinates in a given situation (Mehta, 2012). Furthermore, there are four levels of readiness (Mehta, 2012). The goal of situational leadership is to create a leader-follower match based on leadership styles and subordinate readiness (Luo and Liu, 2014). According to Furtado, Barista, and Silva (2011), the components of

One approach to finish a Needs Assessment procedure is by contracting a qualified proficient that will give the organization the ability from a private foreman with a crisp point of view that permits you and your group to concentrate on what you specialize in. "This could likewise consider broad involvement in assessing procedures inside a business and distinguish open doors for development. This takes into consideration your organization to have a communitarian way to deal with comprehension your business and the novel difficulties you confront. What 's more, the proposals will be both useful and successful."

Self-assessment can be described as the means of examining oneself, the team or organisation that they working in, against certain aspects that are significant to one's personality, team or work structure. Self-Assessment tools can be a very useful way to test personal, management and organisational abilities, performance and goals. They can be used as guidance to assist in implementing change or in the development of a team or an organisation, or even to help a manager grow and improve as a leader. However, there are several disadvantages which together with the advantages will

Since there is no special or one precise type of leader, numerous leadership styles and theories have surfaced. This is because a different situations require different type of leadership styles. In many occasions, leadership theories help to predict the best leadership style to employ in a particular situation. This essay seeks explain why situational leadership theory is useful and relevant in developing an effective leadership culture. It is this writers hope that it can be used as a how to guide to enable managers to be more successful.

Why are some employees happier and more satisfied with their work environment than others? Why are some teams within the same organization more productive than others? How can you get subordinates to trust your decisions, readily cooperate with others and follow your lead? The answer to these questions boils down to one thing; effective leadership. For our purpose, effective leadership can be defined as the art of influencing individuals and groups to accomplish the goals and objectives of the organization (Plunkett, Allan, and Attner, 2013). Effective leadership has a direct impact on the motivation, or lack thereof, of employees and how they interact with others within the organization. Followers will also act in ways that reflect their leaders example, whether it is positive or negative. It is obvious that the leadership culture within our organization is ineffective and employee productivity and morale has slipped to unacceptable levels. Because of our current situation, the following information is presented to you, as managers and supervisors, as a guide to help you become a more effective leader. There are many theories on how best to lead and motivate employees, however, for our purposes, we will concentrate our study and efforts on the situational leadership theories.

The following discussion will be presented: the premise of an assessment model selection, how and when it was developed will be reviewed. Details of how this model was develop and emerging trends of the assessment is introduced. The model foundation and benefits is also explained.

The main parts of the readiness assessment includes examination of the organizations demands for the design, building a results based system, reviewing existing structures for assessing performance and the organization 's capacity requirements. Sharing information as well as involving the key stakeholders, including each employee helps to bring everyone on gaining consensus of the key performance indicators that should be measured. Every key indicator has a cost and work implications therefore each stakeholder needs to reformulate the key concerns identified into a positive desirable outcome in order to gain agreement.

The situational leadership theory focuses on the best leadership styles to address organization changes even in small business environment. This theory said that a leader must select the right styles and the follower must mature to accept responsible for their behavior while the organization is going through changes. This theory has two variables that will help to address the changes in the organization.

It has been a main factor in development and training programs (Hersey et al., 2001). Situational leadership theory is based on how people respond to working and being led in groups.