The Angry Black Man Analysis

Anger: The purpose of anger is to inspire ourselves to defend or protect things that contain importance or value to ourselves such as

Thesis: Demonstrates that the energy used for anger and frustration can turn into passion and devotion

Contrary to the stereotype of African-American males not being committed to marital relationships, African-American men who marry suffer greatly when those marriages end, a University of North Texas sociologist says.Dr. Erma Lawson is the co-author of Black Men and Divorce, a book published this spring that focuses on her research of 50 divorced men. Lawson says she was "absolutely shocked" by the distress all of the men suffered after their divorces."They all experienced a sense of loss, guilt, anger and a sense of failure, even though some of them had wanted to divorce," she says. "It 's related to a gender role -- most men think it 's important to succeed in all areas of life."She recalled talking to one man who had been divorced 10 years."He could recall the exact day and time he had been handed the divorce papers and what his ex-wife was wearing. Then he began to cry," she says. "It made us realize how much divorce is focused on the problems of women and children."She says she began the research after becoming tired of listening to her female friends discuss "the black woman 's lament.""Most of them say that black men are genetically destined to be non-monogamous. I have heard them state 'What 's a black woman to do because most black men are uncommitted to relationships? '" Lawson says. "I have also listened to male bashing from black women, who say men are immature, unreliable and self-centered."But Lawson says these stereotypes of black men didn 't fit the men in

This outburst is fueled by the kind of rage that bell hooks describes in Killing Rage. hooks asserts that for white people, black rage “must always remain repressed, contained, trapped in the realm of the unspeakable” (Killing Rage 12). She critiques black psychiatrists William Grier and Price Cobbs, who wrote the book Black Rage and described such as a sign of powerlessness. hooks argues: “they did not urge the larger culture to see black rage as something other than sickness, to see it as a potentially healthy, potentially healing response to oppression and exploitation” (Killing Rage 12). Because black rage was seen as something that could get black bodies murdered, it was supposed to be contained and hidden. hooks’ view of rage as something vital for the well-being of black individuals is important in the context of Assata’s autobiography. At one point, Assata states that white people could never understand someone becoming a Black revolutionary because “they had so little to revolt against” (119). Later on, in thinking back to having grown up in a segregated south, she remarks: “If i sit and add up all the ‘colored’ toilets and drinking fountains in my life and all of the back-of-the-buses or the Jim Crow railway cars or the places i couldn’t go, it adds up to a one great ball of anger” (138). Writing, then, serves as a form of exorcism, a way to cleanse out the anger from the spirit by channeling it into a creative outlet. The book itself encompasses black rage from

The job of police officers around the world is to serve and protect the community; therefore, community members should feel safe and free under their protection. More often today in the United Sates, that is not the case. Several members of the black community do not feel safe under police protection; in fact, they feel like they are being harassed and threatened by the police. The accounts of people who feel this way has been growing ever since stories like Trayvon Martin, Sandra Bland, Michael Brown and many more. In the book Twelve Angry Men: True Stories of Being a Black Man in America Today edited by Gregory Parks and Matthew Hughey, Solomon Moore, Richard F., and Kent H. all share stories and personal experiences with the police.

On page 69, and again on page 78 of Orange is the New Black by Piper Kerman, Piper talks about the things that were her riches while she was in prison: letters, postcards, books, legal pads, pens, envelopes, and stamps. How do treasures in prison compare to treasures in your own life, and can you relate to the way she feels about her meager possessions?

and they keep the separation when they sees someone else that is contrast of their race. “After a

Fear is an illusion, it can mislead a person to believe in something that is a false impression of reality. Every human being faces fear in daily bases, whether the threat is real itself or that person is imaging it , it is inevitable. Vic, Enn and Olaf all experiences curiosity and fear that lead them to act and react differently. Olaf fear of the big black man is understandable because the big black man is "the biggest, strangest, and blackest man he'd ever seen in all his life. To Olaf ,men were men , and ,in his day, he'd worked and eaten and slept and fought with all kinds of men.

Texas A&M International University was lucky enough to have a speech given by Dr. Martha Nussbaum. Dr. Nussbaum is a philosopher famous for her novel, Anger and Forgiveness, which discusses anger in our culture today. The lecture given reflected that. Throughout the lecture, Dr. Nussbaum discussed many different topics, but her main goal was to show the different effects of anger. “Anger is a big threat to democratic politics, and it is all the worse when fueled by…” she states, “A kind of lurking fear and a sense of helplessness.”

“The Republicans wanted nothing to interfere with winning two million black votes for their part” (Davis, 75). According to Davis, it was a tactical move to favor and support the black freed males over the white females. For the Republicans it was an inappropriate time to support the women suffrage. The republican campaign had the slogan “This is the Negro’s hour”, to show their support for the black suffrage. Davis included that this slogan actually is saying “This is the hour of two million more votes for our party” (Davis, 75).

Seneca says “Anger is the desire of revenge, not the power and faculty of it.” and “Those who think of injuring us are already considered as they injured us because they did it in conceit.” I disagree with this idea because I believe actions are more important than intentions. For example, someone who thinks of killing people is innocent

If you ever scroll down to the comment section of any remotely liberal or feminist news source, video, or blog post, you will probably find a slew of angry comments. These comments are likely from middle aged white men, reacting to whatever the topic is, and often times, ranting about something completely off topic. If the post is explicitly about feminism, the comments are often about feminists hating men, not caring about men’s issues, feminism is not about equality, and other sorts of comments. These commenters, however angry, may have a point. There may need to be more emphasis on men’s issues in feminism. Is there even a place for men in feminism? Can men fully participate or can they only be supporters? Can feminism become all-inclusive so that everyone can be a part of the same movement?

The researcher sees it is a virtue because in most cases people are angry because of pressure and oppression that they cannot take any more. Besides, if people are encouraged not to be angry and not to say no to whatever makes them suffer, they will be negative and submissive with no hope to change or develop. For Aristotle, anger is a complex response to a perceived light or failure of respect" (Bell 170). That is why people have a desire for revenge when they are angry. The idea of appropriate anger coined by Aristotle cannot be applied under conditions of oppression as at these times people need rapid and effective moves instead of moral and ethical

The nature of anger does not change significantly throughout the centuries, but rather the past is often referenced in defining modern anger, whether intentionally or not. Situations of anger in both premodern and modern texts arise for similar reasons and demonstrate the tendency of human nature to remain the same when concerning basic emotions such as anger. Anger here is defined as “a strong feeling of displeasure...aroused by a wrong” (Dictionary). The nature of anger refers to the emotional state at its essence, which can vary in degrees. When discussing how anger has changed over the years, ‘changed’ here means to have been altered in experience of the emotion. Concerning views of anger, they can be taken to mean the views of a society as a whole rather than those of individuals.

The word in the city is that outrage doesn't fill any need. Examines have demonstrated that it puts your heart at danger, expands your odds of a stroke, debilitates your resistance, prompts sadness, and abbreviates your life. What's more, no one truly loves a furious individual. Resentment may turn into an issue, yet it's not the issue. The issue is hostility - rather the forceful activities that stem from displeasure, instead of being with the irate emotions as such. What, specialists say, needs overseeing is not sentiments of resentment but rather animosity.