The Animal Welfare Act: The Antivivisection Movement

One such important law that was signed in 1966 was the Animal Welfare Act that regulates the treatment of animals in research, exhibition, transport, and by dealers.

Like humans, animals have rights too. Back in the old days, animals didn’t have any rights because some people thought they had no feelings of pain. Scientist used them in experiments because of this theory. It came to the point where animals, especially cats and dogs, who were homeless, unwanted, and even sheltered were sent to research institutes (Monamy 29). Monkeys also started getting attention from scientists. Many animals used for these experiments were being mistreated. Many humane groups were furious and started taking action. The Laboratory Animal Welfare Act was enacted in 1966 due to two

New England Anti-Vivisection Society’s article displays the facts on how animal testing does not work. Presenting the horrendous cruelty of animal testing methods and the realities of the reliability of the experimentation, the article shows the lack of compatibility between animals and humans. Neavs’s writing shows that testing on animals does not guarantee results in humans. Neavs is reliable and useful because it cites it’s facts to various other sources. Neavs is trying to help end animal cruelty of all forms by providing information about suffering animals and telling people how to get involved or to just donate so the society itself can help the cause more. Using the examples of cruelty and instances of incompatibility between humans

There are multiple regulations that cover the ethics of animal testing. The federal agencies that can regulate biomedical research are the Public Health Service (PHS) and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), they implement federal regulations through the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). The PHS base their policy animal subject use on The Health Research Extension Act of 1985. The policy covers living vertebrate animals for PHS supported research, training, or biological testing. (Main agencies included in PHS are the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), also Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) contains several others as well). The Animal Welfare Act (AWA)

This act ensured the safety of animals by enforcing all companies to have licenses for their "practices". The animal that was put on that list are dogs, cats, hamsters, monkeys,

The idea of animal rights has been around for centuries. Even decades ago, people were taking action for the welfare of animals. Marc Bekoff and Ned Hettinger share this idea all the way back in 1994 when they said that there is evidence that scientist are concerned with animal welfare by acknowledge that they use the guidelines in place to protect animals during research, in order to have their work published (Bekoff 219). Guidelines are the basis for the moral and ethical treatment of animals. Each person may have his or her own standard, but having a standard among the entire population ensures the welfare of the animals. Unfortunately, these standards are not at a level to where the animals are being protected. Many animals in captivity are treated in ways that would shock the average person. Orcas for example, are starved until they do the desired task (Cowperthwaite). This form of operant condition can lead to success, but often leads to resentment and hostility towards the trainers.

The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) is the only federal law that gives protection to warm -blooded animals in research laboratories. Under this law, it is the researchers’ job to make sure that they provide these animals pain relievers, provide them with the best veterinary care, housing, and food. This law only protects ten percent of the lab animals. The rest of the ninety percent of animals in labs aren’t protected: rats, mice and birds. This means legally the researchers do not have to provide these unprotected lab animals with decent care at all. Researchers can choose to treat these unprotected animals however they want and with as many rats, mice and birds as they please. Knowing how unfair the Welfare Act is towards the many lab animals it should be protecting, the voters should inform and show concern to their legislators in order to stop the mistreatment of these animals. The Animal Welfare Act should protect all animals being tested in research laboratories.

Every year, more than 100 million animals are poisoned, crippled, burned, or abused in United States labs alone. The Animal Welfare Act, or AWA, was passed in 1966 and is the only federal law in the U.S. today that regulates animal treatment in research. That being said, the AWA is not heavily enforced. Additional, the regulations it includes are extremely minimal and do not protect any type of reptiles, amphibians, rats, mice, or birds, meaning that more than ninety percent of the animals being tested on are still submitted to painful and torturous tests. These tests often result in a lifetime of pain and damage because after the tests, the animals are placed back in their cages without any medical treatment and are often used in further

The Animal Welfare Act is designed to provide a minimum standard of care for animals in experimental laboratories. The minimum standards of care that must be provided for

The Laboratory Animal Welfare Act was amended in 1970, altering the name to the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). An important amendment was constituted in the Act that extended animal protection to “all warm-bodied animals determined by the Secretary to be used for experimentation or exhibition, except horses not used in research and farm animals used in food and fiber research.” In 1976, the Animal Welfare Act was amended to expanded the 1966 on prior regulations covering animal transport and commerce. Additionally, section twenty-six was enacted to make any sponsorship and exhibition of animal fighting unlawful. In 1985, Congress amended, for the first time, to make the law applicable to research animals. For instance, the law needs to adopt procedures that lessens pain and stress towards the animals.

According to New England Anti-Vivisection Society (2017),“The Animal Welfare Act (AWA)... is the only U.S. federal law that covers animals in research… it regulates the care and use of animals in research, testing, teaching, exhibition, transport, and by dealers.” One reason that this

In the early 18th centuries, a popular idea was launched with the hopes of finding significant scientific animal research. The idea was known as a vivisection, which is defined as “the practice of performing operations on live animals for the purpose of experimentation or scientific research”. By the next century, the idea had taken off and the term “vivisection” was used specifically for people that were completely opposed to the idea of using live animals for cruel and inhumane experiments, researches, and projects. Now in the 21st century, many anti-vivisection society’s exist; including American Anti-Vivisection Society and the National Anti-Vivisection Society, that were both based off the grounds of ending harmful, cruel, and costly scientific experiments on animals.

The Animal Welfare Act is the only Federal law that manages animal treatment in the means of transport, research, and by dealers (USDA). Although this law conveys the impression that all animals will have a basic standard of treatment, this isn’t the

The law passed by the United States in 1966 places strict laws on animal testing as well. These laws are important for keeping our animals safe and they are very strongly enforced. There is also a human welfare act that puts special protections on animals such as cats and dogs.

For many years now the world has seen controversy over the rights of animals and if they think and feel like humans do. Many people see animals as mindless creatures or as food, while others think they have emotions and can feel pain. In other countries animal protection laws are in place that are strictly enforced and seem to work well with the system. In the United States however; some of the animal rights laws are considered to be useless and under-enforced (Animal Legal & Historical Center). More people today are beginning to see that animals should have rights and should be protected by laws and regulations (Animal Legal & Historical Center). Sadly there are many people residing in the United States who don’t take animal rights or protection laws seriously. These people abuse animals in many ways, including food industries that disobey the regulations set in place for the slaughter of animals used for consumption. Luckily for the animals there are people who fight for their rights and the enforcement of laws called animal rights activists.