The Aoc: Strong Central Government

There were a lot of problems with the Articles of Confederation. Some of which made it so bad to the point of people rebelling against the government. There were states taxing each other way too much. Some states struggled to get any kind of help because the majority of the states has to vote to help a state before it can get help. There were also strengths, like every state followed its own laws and jurisdiction. There were more weaknesses than strengths.

One of the main disadvantages of the Articles of Confederation was that it encouraged a weak central government. Because nine out of thirteen states had to agree upon a law in order for it to be established, very few laws were passed. Amendments of the Articles of Confederation were never passed because the vote had to be unanimous. Not many decisions were made and the Congress generally only had the power to make treaties, deal with foreign affairs, and declare war. The Articles of Confederation read, “Each state shall contain its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right…” (Article II) The states had the most power and the Congress very rarely made decisions that affected the internal affairs of the states or country. There was only one house of Congress where each state only had one vote. This did not allow the bigger states with a greater population to have an advantage over the smaller states, which one could perceive as unfair in certain circumstances. Also, there was no judicial branch, which meant that if a case was not solved on a state level, it had nowhere to go. Fundamentally, the states held the most power. The lack of power within the Congress led to economic crisis.

The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution of the United States. They were written during the revolutionary war to create a more unified government, and to establish what the national government could and could not do. The Articles let each state keep “sovereignty, freedom, and independence,” and created a very weak central government. For example, Congress could not regulate commerce or impose taxes. The impact that the Articles of Confederation had on federalism for the next few years was: the federal government had very few powers, and most of the authority remained in control of each individual state.

The articles of confederation had limited powers they weren’t allowed to do many things for example, they weren’t allowed to tax, it can’t force the states to finance its operations, and couldn’t force a commercial policy. It didn’t make sense how the citizens of the United States felt like the constitution was weak if the articles of confederation did not have an executive branch in their documents. The articles of confederation only had a legislative branch whereas the Constitution had an executive, judicial, and legislative branch.

The Articles of Confederation made the state governments very powerful compared to the limited federal government, but they did start to solve some governing issues. The states were not allowed to conduct diplomacy or engage in foreign policy on their own, but they still had the upper hand on the federal government. This was because the federal government had a unicameral legislature, ineffective methods of ratification and emendation, and little power in areas such as taxation. These flaws made the central government as a whole weak. Despite these problems, the Articles did help unite the thirteen colonies and begin to solve some of the challenges they faced.

This feature created multiple problems towards the country. According to Placard F, “Any single state could prevent a change that the rest of the nation wanted.” Although the majority of the nation approve to change a feature in the Articles of Confederation, one small state could disagree. This makes it nearly impossible to have them create wanted adjustments to the Articles of Confederation. Those wanted adjustments could be harmful towards the majority of the states, however beneficial for a

The Articles of Confederation proved to be ineffective due to its elaborate restrictions based on Legislating news laws. According to Article V, each state was entitled to strictly one vote. This resulted in both large and small states having the same voting weight in congress; there was no proportionality when it came to voting. Due to the “one state, one vote guideline it was much more difficult to pass any viable legislation. For instance, 5/13 states would be needed in order for a bill not to pass. Because every state was considered equal it did not take account that everybody would receive a

The Articles of Confederation was the United State’s first constitution, it was written in an effort to unite the states after the American Revolution and served as a blueprint for the modern constitution. In order for the Articles to become official, they had to be approved by all thirteen colonies. Although Congress sent the Articles of Confederation to the states around the end of 1777 to become ratified, they were not officially adopted until March 1, 1781. Under these Articles, the states remained sovereign and independent, with Congress serving as the last resort on appeal of disputes. The American people feared a strong national government and as a result of this, the Articles of Confederation were specifically designed to be weak in the sense that each state maintains its own sovereignty and all rights to govern themselves, with the except of the rights exclusively granted to Congress. Since the Articles lacked many necessary components to keep a nation properly structured, they were eventually revised into the constitution we recognize today. Although, the Articles of Confederation seemed as though it only contained weaknesses, within the document, many strengths and accomplishments were made. Overall, the Articles of Confederation were proven to be both efficient and non-efficient during the time period they were in effect.

Compared to the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation had a weak national government. The Articles of Confederation couldn’t force taxes or had any control over interstate commerce. The Articles of Confederation also didn’t have any standing armies. In comparison, the Constitution had the supreme law of the land. Congress could collect taxes, regulate commerce, and conduct diplomacy. And there was no more cornage. With the Constitution came Federalism. There was separation of power between three branches. The three branches are the Judicial, Executive, and Legislative Branch. There was also a shared power between states. With the Constitution, we also acquired a president. The president would be the executor of the laws and manages

Both the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution have many similarities and differences. First and foremost, the Articles called for a unicameral legislature while the constitution calls for a bicameral legislature, which allows for a greater amount of representation and checks and balances in congress. Furthermore, in the legislature, the Articles has between two and seven representatives per state whereas the Constitution has two senators per state and a house representatives based upon population. These representatives each have a vote in the Constitution where as in the Articles; each state only had one vote. This allows for equal representation in legislature to ensure each state has a voice in law making and that states will a larger population have a great say, but are not overbearing on smaller states.

he Articles of Confederation created a government that gave the states too much power. The former colonies were afraid to make a government as strong as England's Parliament.The states had more power than the Federal Government. The Congress created by the Articles could not Enforce Treaties and couldn't collect taxes from the states. Not being able to collect taxes made it difficult to pay the soldiers when they were fighting in the Revolutionary War. Other weaknesses of the government created under the Articles deal with the states having more power than the Federal Government. There were no Federal Courts or Executive. States didn't have to follow or enforce Federal Laws. States even made their own money. The money would caused problems

Compare and contrast the Articles of confederation and the Constitution, especially in regard to the specific powers granted to the national government.The formation and ideals of the Articles of Confederation and its successor, the Unites States Constitution, varied from each other in terms of a stronger or weaker federal government in dealing with issues. The Constitution gave more power to the federal government, while the Articles of Confederation involved a very weak government with primary rights interests of the individual states as the focus. Both gave Congress legislative power and set up departments that would eventually be incorporated into the president’s cabinet. The formation of the Articles of Confederation was of the

Governing arrangements provided by the Articles of Confederation included a unicameral legislature, where there was no executive branch in fear it would lead to tyranny and where every state had a single vote. The Confederation was said to grant too much power to states, primarily small states like Rhode Island, where less than two percent of the population vetoed a tax reform, as mentioned in the Central Ideas of American Government textbook. A main weakness of the document is that it led to a weak central government, which had a loose established power over the states. As the professor mentions in one of the module videos, since payments are made by state legislatures and many decisions required approval of a great majority of states, the

The Articles of Confederation were the first attempt at a national government. Under the Articles, there was no executive or judiciary branch, state delegations could vary in size from two to seven and had only one vote, approval of a decision required of majority vote of seven states, however, if this decision meant to amend the Articles, there had to be approval from all 13 state delegations and legislatures, and most importantly, there was a weak central government which meant that it didn't have the power to tax nor to raise a militia. The real power was in the states' governments, who could raise taxes and raise state militia due to the constant fear of a tyrannical government. Like stated before, this form of government gave next to no

There are a number of differences between the Articles of Confederation and the present U.S. constitution, although the overarching structure of the two is very similar. Under the Articles, Congress was a unicameral legislature led by a Congressional president, while under the Constitution Congress is bicameral, made up of the House of Representatives (led by the Speaker of the House) and the Senate (led by the vice-president). Also, under the Articles, each state received one Congressional vote and had at least two representatives per state, but only as many as seven; under the Constitution, each state receives one vote per member of Congress and always has at least one member of Congress (thus each state always has one Congressional vote).