preview

The Application Of Religious Freedom In Australia And Iran

Decent Essays
Open Document

Freedom has a many different forms, meanings and applications. Although the concept is universal, the practices in different countries can vary greatly. Freedoms definition at its philosophical level is “the power to exercise choice and make decisions without constraint from within or without; autonomy; self-determination. Compare necessity” (Dictionary.com, 2017). With a broad application of this, Australia can be defined as a free country, however, in comparison; Iran can be seen to have restricted freedom. There are many differences in how the two countries legislation around religious freedom and woman’s rights. Both countries do have a restrictive hand on their media but Iran takes it to the extreme ultimately showing that the Australian …show more content…

Iran has a very different view on religious freedom by only allowing for Islam and three other protected minority religions. Zoroastrian, Judaism, and Christianity apparently all have protection along with all schools of Islam, despite having to be practiced “within the limits of the law”. This means many discriminations still occur such as the conversion to one of the minority religion from Islam is punishable by death. The worst discrimination is still against the non-recognised minorities, such as the Bahá’ís, despite their status as the largest religion minority (International Federation for Human Rights 2008). There is a very clear difference in the application of religious freedom in Australia and Iran, with one offering complete freedom and the other death for those not following the rules of …show more content…

Australia has a relatively unrestricted media industry, unlike Iran, who has a huge amount of government restriction. There have been laws passed in Australia, such as the restriction of media coverage in detention centres and the storage of mega data, which places restriction and surveillance on the media output ( . This, along with the general guidelines for television and other media, does not limit the knowledge of the Australian population in any substantial way. This is not true for Iran as it has some of the strongest censorship laws in the world. Along with censorship online and offline, self-censorship of journalists occurs due to harassment and punishment under the vague offences the government has outlined. Access to online information platforms, such as social media and YouTube are under a formal ban. This has not stopped some circumventing by Iranian citizens who access these sites but not without monitoring by government groups (Freedom House 2017). The legal environment in Iran for freedom of press and media is so strict that the risks of punishment does not deter them from accessing sites freely available in Australia. The low level of restriction in Australia classifies its media industry to as free whereas the Iranian media industry is

Get Access